Re: [patch -mm] mm, thp: avoid excessive compaction latency during fault fix

[Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>]

On 05/22/2014 04:49 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> I wonder what about a process doing e.g. mmap() with MAP_POPULATE. It seems to
>> me that it would get only MIGRATE_ASYNC here, right? Since gfp_mask would
>> include __GFP_NO_KSWAPD and it won't have PF_KTHREAD.
>> I think that goes against the idea that with MAP_POPULATE you say you are
>> willing to wait to have everything in place before you actually use the
>> memory. So I guess you are also willing to wait for hugepages in that
>> situation?
>>
>
> I don't understand the distinction you're making between MAP_POPULATE and
> simply a prefault of the anon memory.  What is the difference in semantics
> between using MAP_POPULATE and touching a byte every page size along the
> range?  In the latter, you'd be faulting thp with MIGRATE_ASYNC, so I
> don't understand how MAP_POPULATE is any different or implies any
> preference for hugepages.

Hm, OK. It's right we cannot distinguish populating by touching the 
pages manually. Nevermind then.

> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>