All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>, <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: <thellstrom@vmware.com>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<bskeggs@redhat.com>, <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] drm/radeon: handle lockup in delayed work, v2
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:45:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DF9C88.6060107@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53DF9B58.8000403@canonical.com>

Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian König schreef:
>>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset.
>> Yeah, well that's nothing new.
>>
>>> I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and only running the delayed work when !lockup.
>>> But this meant that the timeout was useless to add. I think the cleanest is keeping the v2 patch, because potentially any waiting code can be called during lockup recovery.
>> The lockup code itself should never call any waiting code and V2 doesn't seem to handle a couple of cases correctly either.
>>
>> How about moving the fence waiting out of the reset code?
> What cases did I miss then?
>
> I'm curious how you want to move the fence waiting out of reset, when there are so many places that could potentially wait, like radeon_ib_get can call radeon_sa_bo_new which can do a wait, or radeon_ring_alloc that can wait on radeon_fence_wait_next, etc.

The IB test itself doesn't needs to be protected by the exclusive lock. 
Only everything between radeon_save_bios_scratch_regs and 
radeon_ring_restore.

Christian.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>, airlied@linux.ie
Cc: thellstrom@vmware.com, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] drm/radeon: handle lockup in delayed work, v2
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:45:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DF9C88.6060107@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53DF9B58.8000403@canonical.com>

Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian König schreef:
>>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset.
>> Yeah, well that's nothing new.
>>
>>> I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and only running the delayed work when !lockup.
>>> But this meant that the timeout was useless to add. I think the cleanest is keeping the v2 patch, because potentially any waiting code can be called during lockup recovery.
>> The lockup code itself should never call any waiting code and V2 doesn't seem to handle a couple of cases correctly either.
>>
>> How about moving the fence waiting out of the reset code?
> What cases did I miss then?
>
> I'm curious how you want to move the fence waiting out of reset, when there are so many places that could potentially wait, like radeon_ib_get can call radeon_sa_bo_new which can do a wait, or radeon_ring_alloc that can wait on radeon_fence_wait_next, etc.

The IB test itself doesn't needs to be protected by the exclusive lock. 
Only everything between radeon_save_bios_scratch_regs and 
radeon_ring_restore.

Christian.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-04 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-31 15:32 [PATCH 01/19] fence: add debugging lines to fence_is_signaled for the callback Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:32 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:32 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/ttm: add interruptible parameter to ttm_eu_reserve_buffers Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:32   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/ttm: kill off some members to ttm_validate_buffer Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/nouveau: add reservation to nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/nouveau: require reservations for nouveau_fence_sync and nouveau_bo_fence Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/ttm: call ttm_bo_wait while inside a reservation Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/ttm: kill fence_lock Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/nouveau: rework to new fence interface Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/radeon: handle lockup in delayed work, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-01 16:35   ` Christian König
2014-08-01 16:35     ` Christian König
2014-08-01 17:46     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-01 17:46       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04  8:36       ` Christian König
2014-08-04  8:36         ` Christian König
2014-08-04  8:55         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04  8:55           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 11:57           ` Christian König
2014-08-04 11:57             ` Christian König
2014-08-04 13:34             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 13:34               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 14:37               ` Christian König
2014-08-04 14:37                 ` Christian König
2014-08-04 14:40                 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 14:40                   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 14:45                   ` Christian König [this message]
2014-08-04 14:45                     ` Christian König
2014-08-04 14:58                     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 14:58                       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 15:04                       ` Christian König
2014-08-04 15:04                         ` Christian König
2014-08-04 15:09                         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 15:09                           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04 17:04                           ` Christian König
2014-08-04 17:04                             ` Christian König
2014-08-05  8:16                             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-05  8:16                               ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-05  9:34                             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-05  9:34                               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/radeon: add timeout argument to radeon_fence_wait_seq Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/radeon: use common fence implementation for fences, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/qxl: rework to new fence interface Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/vmwgfx: get rid of different types of fence_flags entirely Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/vmwgfx: rework to new fence interface Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/ttm: flip the switch, and convert to dma_fence Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/nouveau: use rcu in nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/radeon: use rcu waits in some ioctls Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-01  8:27   ` Michel Dänzer
2014-08-01 10:12     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-01 14:13       ` Michel Dänzer
2014-08-01 17:07         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04  8:42           ` Michel Dänzer
2014-08-04  8:56             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-08-04  9:25               ` Michel Dänzer
2014-08-04  9:30                 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/vmwgfx: use rcu in vmw_user_dmabuf_synccpu_grab Maarten Lankhorst
2014-07-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/ttm: use rcu in core ttm Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53DF9C88.6060107@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.