All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-09-08 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross
  Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky, David Vrabel,
	James E.J. Bottomley, xen-devel, linux-scsi, kernel-janitors

This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
has to be ATOMIC.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
 		}
 		seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
 		shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
-			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
+			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (!shadow->sg)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-09-08 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross
  Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky, David Vrabel,
	James E.J. Bottomley, xen-devel, linux-scsi, kernel-janitors

This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
has to be ATOMIC.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
 		}
 		seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
 		shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
-			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
+			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (!shadow->sg)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
  2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2014-09-08 11:30   ` Juergen Gross
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2014-09-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 09/08/2014 01:15 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Thanks,

Juergen

>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
>   		}
>   		seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
>   		shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
> -			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
> +			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
>   		if (!shadow->sg)
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:30   ` Juergen Gross
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2014-09-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 09/08/2014 01:15 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Thanks,

Juergen

>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
>   		}
>   		seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
>   		shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
> -			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
> +			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
>   		if (!shadow->sg)
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
  2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
  (?)
@ 2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2014-09-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 09/08/2014 01:15 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Thanks,

Juergen

>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
>   		}
>   		seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
>   		shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
> -			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
> +			sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
>   		if (!shadow->sg)
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
  2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2014-09-08 17:34   ` David Vrabel
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2014-09-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Juergen Gross
  Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 08/09/14 12:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.

Applied this and the scsiback one to devel/for-linus-3.18.

Thanks.

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 17:34   ` David Vrabel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2014-09-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Juergen Gross
  Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 08/09/14 12:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.

Applied this and the scsiback one to devel/for-linus-3.18.

Thanks.

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
  2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2014-09-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, Juergen Gross
  Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
	xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky

On 08/09/14 12:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.

Applied this and the scsiback one to devel/for-linus-3.18.

Thanks.

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-08 17:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-08 11:15 [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock Dan Carpenter
2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-08 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2014-09-08 11:30   ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-08 17:34 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-08 17:34   ` David Vrabel

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.