* [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-09-08 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juergen Gross
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky, David Vrabel,
James E.J. Bottomley, xen-devel, linux-scsi, kernel-janitors
This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
has to be ATOMIC.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
}
seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
- sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
+ sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!shadow->sg)
return -ENOMEM;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-09-08 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juergen Gross
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky, David Vrabel,
James E.J. Bottomley, xen-devel, linux-scsi, kernel-janitors
This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
has to be ATOMIC.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
}
seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
- sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
+ sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!shadow->sg)
return -ENOMEM;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
(?)
@ 2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2014-09-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
On 09/08/2014 01:15 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Thanks,
Juergen
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
> }
> seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
> shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
> - sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
> + sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!shadow->sg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2014-09-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
On 09/08/2014 01:15 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Thanks,
Juergen
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
> }
> seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
> shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
> - sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
> + sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!shadow->sg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2014-09-08 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
On 09/08/2014 01:15 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Thanks,
Juergen
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
> }
> seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
> shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
> - sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
> + sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!shadow->sg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2014-09-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, Juergen Gross
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
On 08/09/14 12:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
Applied this and the scsiback one to devel/for-linus-3.18.
Thanks.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2014-09-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, Juergen Gross
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
On 08/09/14 12:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
Applied this and the scsiback one to devel/for-linus-3.18.
Thanks.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2014-09-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, Juergen Gross
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
On 08/09/14 12:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
> The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
> has to be ATOMIC.
Applied this and the scsiback one to devel/for-linus-3.18.
Thanks.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
@ 2014-09-08 11:15 Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-09-08 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juergen Gross
Cc: linux-scsi, kernel-janitors, James E.J. Bottomley, David Vrabel,
xen-devel, Boris Ostrovsky
This function is only called with a spin_lock held and IRQs disabled.
The allocation is not allowed to sleep and NOIO is not sufficient, it
has to be ATOMIC.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 0aceb70..7e88659 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int map_data_for_request(struct vscsifrnt_info *info,
}
seg_grants = vscsiif_grants_sg(data_grants);
shadow->sg = kcalloc(data_grants,
- sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_NOIO);
+ sizeof(struct scsiif_request_segment), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!shadow->sg)
return -ENOMEM;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-08 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-08 11:15 [patch] xen-scsifront: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock Dan Carpenter
2014-09-08 11:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-08 11:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2014-09-08 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-08 17:34 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-08 17:34 ` David Vrabel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-08 11:15 Dan Carpenter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.