[PATCH -stable] block: fix ext_dev_lock lockdep report

* [PATCH -stable] block: fix ext_dev_lock lockdep report
@ 2015-06-11  3:47 Dan Williams
  2015-06-11  7:51 ` Jiri Slaby
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2015-06-11  3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe; +Cc: Keith Busch, neilb, linux-kernel, stable

 =================================
 [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 4.1.0-rc7+ #217 Tainted: G           O
 ---------------------------------
 inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
 swapper/6/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
  (ext_devt_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff8143a60c>] blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70
 {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
   [<ffffffff810bf6b1>] __lock_acquire+0x461/0x1e70
   [<ffffffff810c1947>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0x290
   [<ffffffff818ac3a8>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
   [<ffffffff8143a07d>] blk_alloc_devt+0x6d/0xd0  <-- take the lock in process context
[..]
  [<ffffffff810bf64e>] __lock_acquire+0x3fe/0x1e70
  [<ffffffff810c00ad>] ? __lock_acquire+0xe5d/0x1e70
  [<ffffffff810c1947>] lock_acquire+0xb7/0x290
  [<ffffffff8143a60c>] ? blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70
  [<ffffffff818ac3a8>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
  [<ffffffff8143a60c>] ? blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70
  [<ffffffff8143a60c>] blk_free_devt+0x3c/0x70    <-- take the lock in softirq
  [<ffffffff8143bfec>] part_release+0x1c/0x50
  [<ffffffff8158edf6>] device_release+0x36/0xb0
  [<ffffffff8145ac2b>] kobject_cleanup+0x7b/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff8145aad0>] kobject_put+0x30/0x70
  [<ffffffff8158f147>] put_device+0x17/0x20
  [<ffffffff8143c29c>] delete_partition_rcu_cb+0x16c/0x180
  [<ffffffff8143c130>] ? read_dev_sector+0xa0/0xa0
  [<ffffffff810e0e0f>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x2ff/0xa90
  [<ffffffff810e0dcf>] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0x2bf/0xa90
  [<ffffffff81067e2e>] __do_softirq+0xde/0x600

Neil sees this in his tests and it also triggers on pmem driver unbind
for the libnvdimm tests.  This fix is on top of an initial fix by Keith
for incorrect usage of mutex_lock() in this path: 2da78092dda1 "block:
Fix dev_t minor allocation lifetime".  Both this and 2da78092dda1 are
candidates for -stable.

Fixes: 2da78092dda1 ("block: Fix dev_t minor allocation lifetime")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---

Note that 2da78092dda1 had "Cc: stable@kernel.org" instead of @vger.kernel.org.

 block/genhd.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 666e11b83983..ea982eadaf63 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ int blk_alloc_devt(struct hd_struct *part, dev_t *devt)
 	/* allocate ext devt */
 	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
 
-	spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&ext_devt_lock);
 	idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_NOWAIT);
-	spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&ext_devt_lock);
 
 	idr_preload_end();
 	if (idx < 0)
@@ -449,9 +449,9 @@ void blk_free_devt(dev_t devt)
 		return;
 
 	if (MAJOR(devt) == BLOCK_EXT_MAJOR) {
-		spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&ext_devt_lock);
 		idr_remove(&ext_devt_idr, blk_mangle_minor(MINOR(devt)));
-		spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ext_devt_lock);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -690,13 +690,13 @@ struct gendisk *get_gendisk(dev_t devt, int *partno)
 	} else {
 		struct hd_struct *part;
 
-		spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&ext_devt_lock);
 		part = idr_find(&ext_devt_idr, blk_mangle_minor(MINOR(devt)));
 		if (part && get_disk(part_to_disk(part))) {
 			*partno = part->partno;
 			disk = part_to_disk(part);
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ext_devt_lock);
 	}
 
 	return disk;


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread