All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/hvm: add length to mmio check op
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:08:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558AC7E80200007800088E7E@mail.emea.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435145089-21999-8-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com>

>>> On 24.06.15 at 13:24, <paul.durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
> @@ -498,10 +498,11 @@ static int hpet_write(
>      return X86EMUL_OKAY;
>  }
>  
> -static int hpet_range(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr)
> +static int hpet_range(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr,
> +                      unsigned long length)
>  {
> -    return ( (addr >= HPET_BASE_ADDRESS) &&
> -             (addr < (HPET_BASE_ADDRESS + HPET_MMAP_SIZE)) );
> +    return (addr >= HPET_BASE_ADDRESS) &&
> +           ((addr + length) < (HPET_BASE_ADDRESS + HPET_MMAP_SIZE));

<=

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> @@ -986,14 +986,16 @@ int hvm_x2apic_msr_write(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content)
>      return vlapic_reg_write(v, offset, (uint32_t)msr_content);
>  }
>  
> -static int vlapic_range(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr)
> +static int vlapic_range(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long address,
> +                        unsigned long len)
>  {
>      struct vlapic *vlapic = vcpu_vlapic(v);
> -    unsigned long offset  = addr - vlapic_base_address(vlapic);
> +    unsigned long offset  = address - vlapic_base_address(vlapic);
>  
>      return !vlapic_hw_disabled(vlapic) &&
>             !vlapic_x2apic_mode(vlapic) &&
> -           (offset < PAGE_SIZE);
> +           (address >= vlapic_base_address(vlapic)) &&
> +           ((offset + len) <= PAGE_SIZE);

I'd prefer to stay with checking just offset here, unless you see
anything wrong with that.

> @@ -333,12 +333,15 @@ out:
>      return r;
>  }
>  
> -static int msixtbl_range(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr)
> +static int msixtbl_range(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long address,
> +                         unsigned long len)
>  {
> +    struct msixtbl_entry *entry;
>      const struct msi_desc *desc;
>  
>      rcu_read_lock(&msixtbl_rcu_lock);
> -    desc = msixtbl_addr_to_desc(msixtbl_find_entry(v, addr), addr);
> +    entry = msixtbl_find_entry(v, address, len);
> +    desc = msixtbl_addr_to_desc(entry, address);

Again I don't see the need to do more adjustments here than
necessary for your purpose.

> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/io.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/io.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ typedef int (*hvm_mmio_write_t)(struct vcpu *v,
>                                  unsigned long addr,
>                                  unsigned long length,
>                                  unsigned long val);
> -typedef int (*hvm_mmio_check_t)(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long addr);
> +typedef int (*hvm_mmio_check_t)(struct vcpu *v,
> +                                unsigned long addr,
> +                                unsigned long length);

I don't think this really needs to be "long"?

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-24 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-24 11:24 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/hvm: simplify hvmemul_do_io() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] x86/hvm: remove hvm_io_pending() check in hvmemul_do_io() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] x86/hvm: remove extraneous parameter from hvmtrace_io_assist() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/hvm: remove multiple open coded 'chunking' loops Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 12:33   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 12:59     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:09       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/hvm: re-name struct hvm_mmio_handler to hvm_mmio_ops Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86/hvm: unify internal portio and mmio intercepts Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/hvm: add length to mmio check op Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:08   ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2015-06-24 13:14     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:25       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 13:34         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 14:01           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 12:21   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 12:46     ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 13:08       ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:29         ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 13:30           ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:34       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 13:36         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:37           ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 13:38             ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:46               ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 13:48                 ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:47           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 13:52             ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 14:46               ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 14:57                 ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/hvm: unify dpci portio intercept with standard portio intercept Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:46   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/hvm: unify stdvga mmio intercept with standard mmio intercept Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:59   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 14:12     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 14:30       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 14:43         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86/hvm: revert 82ed8716b "fix direct PCI port I/O emulation retry Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 15:21   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 15:23     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/hvm: only call hvm_io_assist() from hvm_wait_for_io() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 15:36   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 15:50     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] x86/hvm: split I/O completion handling from state model Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:40   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 15:59     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86/hvm: remove HVMIO_dispatched I/O state Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 15:52   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 16:00     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 16:12       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 17:00         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 12:29   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/hvm: remove hvm_io_state enumeration Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:43   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25  9:46     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] x86/hvm: use ioreq_t to track in-flight state Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:51   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:17     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] x86/hvm: always re-emulate I/O from a buffer Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:57   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:32     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 10:50       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:52         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] x86/hvm: track large memory mapped accesses by buffer offset Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 10:46   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:51     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 11:05       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:55     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 11:08       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 12:52   ` Paul Durrant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=558AC7E80200007800088E7E@mail.emea.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.