All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/hvm: add length to mmio check op
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:52:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD02597131E@AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558C22970200007800089B12@mail.emea.novell.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: 25 June 2015 14:48
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Keir (Xen.org)
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/hvm: add length to mmio check op
> 
> >>> On 25.06.15 at 15:36, <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com> wrote:
> > I think that also allows me to simplfy the patch since I don't have to
> > modify the mmio_check op any more. I simply call it once for the first byte
> > of the access and, if it accepts, verify that it also accepts the last byte
> > of the access.
> 
> That's actually not (generally) okay: There could be a hole in the
> middle. But as long as instructions don't do accesses wider than
> a page, we're fine with that in practice I think. Or wait, no, in the
> MSI-X this could not be okay: A 64-byte read to the 16 bytes
> 32 bytes away from a page boundary (and being the last entry
> on one device's MSI-X table) would extend into another device's
> MSI-X table on the next page. I.e. first and last bytes would be
> okay to be accessed, but bytes 16...31 of the access wouldn't.
> Of course the MSI-X read/write handlers don't currently permit
> such wide accesses, but anyway...
> 

We could also verify that, for a rep op, all reads/writes come back with OKAY. I think that would be ok.

  Paul

> Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-25 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-24 11:24 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/hvm: simplify hvmemul_do_io() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] x86/hvm: remove hvm_io_pending() check in hvmemul_do_io() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] x86/hvm: remove extraneous parameter from hvmtrace_io_assist() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/hvm: remove multiple open coded 'chunking' loops Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 12:33   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 12:59     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:09       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/hvm: re-name struct hvm_mmio_handler to hvm_mmio_ops Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86/hvm: unify internal portio and mmio intercepts Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/hvm: add length to mmio check op Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:08   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 13:14     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:25       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 13:34         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 14:01           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 12:21   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 12:46     ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 13:08       ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:29         ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 13:30           ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:34       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 13:36         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:37           ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 13:38             ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:46               ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 13:48                 ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 13:47           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 13:52             ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2015-06-25 14:46               ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 14:57                 ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/hvm: unify dpci portio intercept with standard portio intercept Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:46   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/hvm: unify stdvga mmio intercept with standard mmio intercept Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 13:59   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 14:12     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 14:30       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 14:43         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86/hvm: revert 82ed8716b "fix direct PCI port I/O emulation retry Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 15:21   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 15:23     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/hvm: only call hvm_io_assist() from hvm_wait_for_io() Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 15:36   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 15:50     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] x86/hvm: split I/O completion handling from state model Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:40   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 15:59     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86/hvm: remove HVMIO_dispatched I/O state Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 15:52   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 16:00     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 16:12       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 17:00         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 12:29   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/hvm: remove hvm_io_state enumeration Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:43   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25  9:46     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] x86/hvm: use ioreq_t to track in-flight state Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:51   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:17     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] x86/hvm: always re-emulate I/O from a buffer Paul Durrant
2015-06-25  9:57   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:32     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 10:50       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:52         ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-24 11:24 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] x86/hvm: track large memory mapped accesses by buffer offset Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 10:46   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:51     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 11:05       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-25 10:55     ` Paul Durrant
2015-06-25 11:08       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix Jan Beulich
2015-06-24 12:52   ` Paul Durrant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD02597131E@AMSPEX01CL02.citrite.net \
    --to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.