From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> To: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>, "eric.auger@st.com" <eric.auger@st.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "christoffer.dall@linaro.org" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, "marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, "avi.kivity@gmail.com" <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, "mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>, "joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>, "b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com" <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:00:55 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <559BB167.1030603@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0025F342B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> On 07/07/2015 12:58, Wu, Feng wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@linaro.org] >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:11 PM >> To: eric.auger@st.com; eric.auger@linaro.org; >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; christoffer.dall@linaro.org; marc.zyngier@arm.com; >> alex.williamson@redhat.com; pbonzini@redhat.com; avi.kivity@gmail.com; >> mtosatti@redhat.com; Wu, Feng; joro@8bytes.org; >> b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patches@linaro.org >> Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control >> >> - [add,del]_[consumer,producer] updated to takes both the consumer and >> producer handles. This is requested to combine info from both, >> typically to link the source irq owned by the producer with the gsi >> owned by the consumer (forwarded IRQ setup). >> - new methods are added: >> x stop/resume: Those are needed for forwarding since the state change >> requires to entermingle actions at consumer, producer. >> x consumer update for posted interrupts >> - On handshake, we now call connect, disconnect which features the more >> complex sequence. >> - add irq on producer side >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - remove vfio_device, kvm, gsi, opaque fields included in v1 except common >> - all those in can be retrieved with container_of in callbacks >> --- >> include/linux/irqbypass.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- >> kernel/irq/bypass.c | 44 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/irqbypass.h b/include/linux/irqbypass.h >> index 718508e..8f62235 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/irqbypass.h >> +++ b/include/linux/irqbypass.h >> @@ -3,17 +3,30 @@ >> >> #include <linux/list.h> >> >> +struct irq_bypass_consumer; >> + >> struct irq_bypass_producer { >> struct list_head node; >> void *token; >> - /* TBD */ >> + int irq; /* linux irq */ >> + void (*stop)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*resume)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> + void (*del_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> }; >> >> struct irq_bypass_consumer { >> struct list_head node; >> void *token; > > Can we add a pointer to ' struct irq_bypass_producer ', and > assign it when connecting, de-assign it when disconnecting. > since in some case, I need to update IRTE from the consumer > side, where I cannot get the related producer info (I need irq info) > without iterating it again. You can use container_of to add it to your own struct, e.g. struct irq_bypass_consumer cons; struct irq_bypass_producer *prod; Paolo > Thanks, > Feng > >> - void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> - void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*stop)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> + void (*resume)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> + void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*update)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> }; >> >> int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> diff --git a/kernel/irq/bypass.c b/kernel/irq/bypass.c >> index 5d0f92b..efadbe5 100644 >> --- a/kernel/irq/bypass.c >> +++ b/kernel/irq/bypass.c >> @@ -19,6 +19,42 @@ static LIST_HEAD(producers); >> static LIST_HEAD(consumers); >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock); >> >> +/* lock must be hold when calling connect */ >> +static void connect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) >> +{ >> + if (prod->stop) >> + prod->stop(prod); >> + if (cons->stop) >> + cons->stop(cons); >> + if (prod->add_consumer) >> + prod->add_consumer(prod, cons); >> + if (cons->add_producer) >> + cons->add_producer(cons, prod); >> + if (cons->resume) >> + cons->resume(cons); >> + if (prod->resume) >> + prod->resume(prod); >> +} >> + >> +/* lock must be hold when calling disconnect */ >> +static void disconnect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) >> +{ >> + if (prod->stop) >> + prod->stop(prod); >> + if (cons->stop) >> + cons->stop(cons); >> + if (cons->del_producer) >> + cons->del_producer(cons, prod); >> + if (prod->del_consumer) >> + prod->del_consumer(prod, cons); >> + if (cons->resume) >> + cons->resume(cons); >> + if (prod->resume) >> + prod->resume(prod); >> +} >> + >> int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer) >> { >> struct irq_bypass_producer *tmp; >> @@ -38,7 +74,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct >> irq_bypass_producer *producer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) { >> if (consumer->token == producer->token) { >> - consumer->add_producer(producer); >> + connect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> @@ -56,7 +92,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_producer(struct >> irq_bypass_producer *producer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) { >> if (consumer->token == producer->token) { >> - consumer->del_producer(producer); >> + disconnect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> @@ -86,7 +122,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct >> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) { >> if (producer->token == consumer->token) { >> - consumer->add_producer(producer); >> + connect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> @@ -104,7 +140,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct >> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) { >> if (producer->token == consumer->token) { >> - consumer->del_producer(producer); >> + disconnect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:00:55 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <559BB167.1030603@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0025F342B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> On 07/07/2015 12:58, Wu, Feng wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger at linaro.org] >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:11 PM >> To: eric.auger at st.com; eric.auger at linaro.org; >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu; >> kvm at vger.kernel.org; christoffer.dall at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com; >> alex.williamson at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; avi.kivity at gmail.com; >> mtosatti at redhat.com; Wu, Feng; joro at 8bytes.org; >> b.reynal at virtualopensystems.com >> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; patches at linaro.org >> Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control >> >> - [add,del]_[consumer,producer] updated to takes both the consumer and >> producer handles. This is requested to combine info from both, >> typically to link the source irq owned by the producer with the gsi >> owned by the consumer (forwarded IRQ setup). >> - new methods are added: >> x stop/resume: Those are needed for forwarding since the state change >> requires to entermingle actions at consumer, producer. >> x consumer update for posted interrupts >> - On handshake, we now call connect, disconnect which features the more >> complex sequence. >> - add irq on producer side >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - remove vfio_device, kvm, gsi, opaque fields included in v1 except common >> - all those in can be retrieved with container_of in callbacks >> --- >> include/linux/irqbypass.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- >> kernel/irq/bypass.c | 44 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/irqbypass.h b/include/linux/irqbypass.h >> index 718508e..8f62235 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/irqbypass.h >> +++ b/include/linux/irqbypass.h >> @@ -3,17 +3,30 @@ >> >> #include <linux/list.h> >> >> +struct irq_bypass_consumer; >> + >> struct irq_bypass_producer { >> struct list_head node; >> void *token; >> - /* TBD */ >> + int irq; /* linux irq */ >> + void (*stop)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*resume)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> + void (*del_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> }; >> >> struct irq_bypass_consumer { >> struct list_head node; >> void *token; > > Can we add a pointer to ' struct irq_bypass_producer ', and > assign it when connecting, de-assign it when disconnecting. > since in some case, I need to update IRTE from the consumer > side, where I cannot get the related producer info (I need irq info) > without iterating it again. You can use container_of to add it to your own struct, e.g. struct irq_bypass_consumer cons; struct irq_bypass_producer *prod; Paolo > Thanks, > Feng > >> - void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> - void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*stop)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> + void (*resume)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> + void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *, >> + struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> + void (*update)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *); >> }; >> >> int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *); >> diff --git a/kernel/irq/bypass.c b/kernel/irq/bypass.c >> index 5d0f92b..efadbe5 100644 >> --- a/kernel/irq/bypass.c >> +++ b/kernel/irq/bypass.c >> @@ -19,6 +19,42 @@ static LIST_HEAD(producers); >> static LIST_HEAD(consumers); >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock); >> >> +/* lock must be hold when calling connect */ >> +static void connect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) >> +{ >> + if (prod->stop) >> + prod->stop(prod); >> + if (cons->stop) >> + cons->stop(cons); >> + if (prod->add_consumer) >> + prod->add_consumer(prod, cons); >> + if (cons->add_producer) >> + cons->add_producer(cons, prod); >> + if (cons->resume) >> + cons->resume(cons); >> + if (prod->resume) >> + prod->resume(prod); >> +} >> + >> +/* lock must be hold when calling disconnect */ >> +static void disconnect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod, >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) >> +{ >> + if (prod->stop) >> + prod->stop(prod); >> + if (cons->stop) >> + cons->stop(cons); >> + if (cons->del_producer) >> + cons->del_producer(cons, prod); >> + if (prod->del_consumer) >> + prod->del_consumer(prod, cons); >> + if (cons->resume) >> + cons->resume(cons); >> + if (prod->resume) >> + prod->resume(prod); >> +} >> + >> int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer) >> { >> struct irq_bypass_producer *tmp; >> @@ -38,7 +74,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct >> irq_bypass_producer *producer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) { >> if (consumer->token == producer->token) { >> - consumer->add_producer(producer); >> + connect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> @@ -56,7 +92,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_producer(struct >> irq_bypass_producer *producer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) { >> if (consumer->token == producer->token) { >> - consumer->del_producer(producer); >> + disconnect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> @@ -86,7 +122,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct >> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) { >> if (producer->token == consumer->token) { >> - consumer->add_producer(producer); >> + connect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> @@ -104,7 +140,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct >> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer) >> >> list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) { >> if (producer->token == consumer->token) { >> - consumer->del_producer(producer); >> + disconnect(producer, consumer); >> break; >> } >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 11:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-07-06 12:11 [RFC v2 0/6] IRQ bypass manager and irqfd consumer Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 1/6] KVM: arm/arm64: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:24 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:24 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 2/6] VFIO: platform: " Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 15:35 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 15:35 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 15:57 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 15:57 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 17:09 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 17:09 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 7:10 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 7:10 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 10:58 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 10:58 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 10:58 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message] 2015-07-07 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:18 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:18 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:18 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:24 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:24 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:24 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 13:22 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 13:22 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 13:22 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 4/6] KVM: create kvm_irqfd.h Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 5/6] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 8:47 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 8:47 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 8:47 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 9:05 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 9:05 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 9:05 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 9:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 9:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 9:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 17:17 ` [RFC v2 0/6] IRQ bypass manager and irqfd consumer Alex Williamson 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 12:28 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 12:28 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 14:13 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 14:13 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-09 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-09 15:34 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 15:34 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 15:34 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 16:06 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 16:06 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 16:06 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-24 1:27 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-24 1:27 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-24 1:27 ` Wu, Feng
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=559BB167.1030603@redhat.com \ --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \ --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \ --cc=b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com \ --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \ --cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \ --cc=eric.auger@st.com \ --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \ --cc=patches@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.