From: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>, "eric.auger@st.com" <eric.auger@st.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "christoffer.dall@linaro.org" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, "marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "avi.kivity@gmail.com" <avi.kivity@gmail.com>, "mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>, "joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>, "b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com" <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>, "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> Subject: RE: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:13:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0025F2CF8@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <559B966F.4010508@linaro.org> > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 5:06 PM > To: Wu, Feng; eric.auger@st.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm@vger.kernel.org; > christoffer.dall@linaro.org; marc.zyngier@arm.com; > alex.williamson@redhat.com; pbonzini@redhat.com; avi.kivity@gmail.com; > mtosatti@redhat.com; joro@8bytes.org; b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patches@linaro.org > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management > > Hi Feng, > On 07/07/2015 10:47 AM, Wu, Feng wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@linaro.org] > >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:12 PM > >> To: eric.auger@st.com; eric.auger@linaro.org; > >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; > >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; christoffer.dall@linaro.org; marc.zyngier@arm.com; > >> alex.williamson@redhat.com; pbonzini@redhat.com; avi.kivity@gmail.com; > >> mtosatti@redhat.com; Wu, Feng; joro@8bytes.org; > >> b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com > >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patches@linaro.org > >> Subject: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management > >> > >> This patch adds the registration/unregistration of an > >> irq_bypass_consumer on irqfd assignment/deassignment. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > >> > >> --- > >> > >> v1 -> v2: > >> - populate of kvm and gsi removed > >> - unregister the consumer on irqfd_shutdown > >> --- > >> include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h | 1 + > >> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h > >> index f926b39..3c0bd07 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h > >> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irqfd { > >> struct list_head list; > >> poll_table pt; > >> struct work_struct shutdown; > >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer consumer; > >> }; > >> > >> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_IRQFD_H */ > >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > >> index b79dc61..9452754 100644 > >> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > >> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > >> #include <linux/srcu.h> > >> #include <linux/slab.h> > >> #include <linux/seqlock.h> > >> +#include <linux/irqbypass.h> > >> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> > >> > >> #include <kvm/iodev.h> > >> @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work) > >> /* > >> * It is now safe to release the object's resources > >> */ > >> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > >> eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd); > >> kfree(irqfd); > >> } > >> @@ -380,7 +382,14 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_irqfd > >> *args) > >> */ > >> fdput(f); > >> > >> - /* irq_bypass_register_consumer(); */ > >> + irqfd->consumer.token = (void *)irqfd->eventfd; > >> + irqfd->consumer.add_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer; > >> + irqfd->consumer.del_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer; > >> + irqfd->consumer.stop = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop; > >> + irqfd->consumer.resume = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_resume; > >> + irqfd->consumer.update = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_update; > >> + ret = irq_bypass_register_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > >> + WARN_ON(ret); > >> > >> return 0; > >> > >> @@ -481,8 +490,6 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_irqfd > >> *args) > >> struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd, *tmp; > >> struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd; > >> > >> - /* irq_bypass_unregister_consumer() */ > >> - > >> eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd); > >> if (IS_ERR(eventfd)) > >> return PTR_ERR(eventfd); > >> @@ -501,6 +508,7 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_irqfd > >> *args) > >> irqfd->irq_entry.type = 0; > >> write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc); > >> irqfd_deactivate(irqfd); > >> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > > > > consumer is unregistered in irqfd_shutdown(), why need we do it here? > Yes you're right, this is not needed anymore. Did things too hastily :-( > > Otherwise does that isolated series fit your needs for posted interrupts > and match your expectations with regards to split/reusability? Basically, they are fine. I am trying to rebase my patch on top of it. If I encounter any issues, I will discuss it here ASAP. Thanks, Feng > > Eric > > > > > Thanks, > > Feng > > > >> } > >> } > >> > >> -- > >> 1.9.1 > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: feng.wu@intel.com (Wu, Feng) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:13:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0025F2CF8@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <559B966F.4010508@linaro.org> > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger at linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 5:06 PM > To: Wu, Feng; eric.auger at st.com; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; > kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm at vger.kernel.org; > christoffer.dall at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com; > alex.williamson at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; avi.kivity at gmail.com; > mtosatti at redhat.com; joro at 8bytes.org; b.reynal at virtualopensystems.com > Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; patches at linaro.org > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management > > Hi Feng, > On 07/07/2015 10:47 AM, Wu, Feng wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger at linaro.org] > >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:12 PM > >> To: eric.auger at st.com; eric.auger at linaro.org; > >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu; > >> kvm at vger.kernel.org; christoffer.dall at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com; > >> alex.williamson at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; avi.kivity at gmail.com; > >> mtosatti at redhat.com; Wu, Feng; joro at 8bytes.org; > >> b.reynal at virtualopensystems.com > >> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; patches at linaro.org > >> Subject: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management > >> > >> This patch adds the registration/unregistration of an > >> irq_bypass_consumer on irqfd assignment/deassignment. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > >> > >> --- > >> > >> v1 -> v2: > >> - populate of kvm and gsi removed > >> - unregister the consumer on irqfd_shutdown > >> --- > >> include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h | 1 + > >> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h > >> index f926b39..3c0bd07 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h > >> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irqfd { > >> struct list_head list; > >> poll_table pt; > >> struct work_struct shutdown; > >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer consumer; > >> }; > >> > >> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_IRQFD_H */ > >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > >> index b79dc61..9452754 100644 > >> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > >> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c > >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > >> #include <linux/srcu.h> > >> #include <linux/slab.h> > >> #include <linux/seqlock.h> > >> +#include <linux/irqbypass.h> > >> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> > >> > >> #include <kvm/iodev.h> > >> @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work) > >> /* > >> * It is now safe to release the object's resources > >> */ > >> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > >> eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd); > >> kfree(irqfd); > >> } > >> @@ -380,7 +382,14 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_irqfd > >> *args) > >> */ > >> fdput(f); > >> > >> - /* irq_bypass_register_consumer(); */ > >> + irqfd->consumer.token = (void *)irqfd->eventfd; > >> + irqfd->consumer.add_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer; > >> + irqfd->consumer.del_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer; > >> + irqfd->consumer.stop = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop; > >> + irqfd->consumer.resume = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_resume; > >> + irqfd->consumer.update = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_update; > >> + ret = irq_bypass_register_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > >> + WARN_ON(ret); > >> > >> return 0; > >> > >> @@ -481,8 +490,6 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_irqfd > >> *args) > >> struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd, *tmp; > >> struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd; > >> > >> - /* irq_bypass_unregister_consumer() */ > >> - > >> eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd); > >> if (IS_ERR(eventfd)) > >> return PTR_ERR(eventfd); > >> @@ -501,6 +508,7 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct > kvm_irqfd > >> *args) > >> irqfd->irq_entry.type = 0; > >> write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc); > >> irqfd_deactivate(irqfd); > >> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > > > > consumer is unregistered in irqfd_shutdown(), why need we do it here? > Yes you're right, this is not needed anymore. Did things too hastily :-( > > Otherwise does that isolated series fit your needs for posted interrupts > and match your expectations with regards to split/reusability? Basically, they are fine. I am trying to rebase my patch on top of it. If I encounter any issues, I will discuss it here ASAP. Thanks, Feng > > Eric > > > > > Thanks, > > Feng > > > >> } > >> } > >> > >> -- > >> 1.9.1 > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 9:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-07-06 12:11 [RFC v2 0/6] IRQ bypass manager and irqfd consumer Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 1/6] KVM: arm/arm64: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:24 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:24 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 2/6] VFIO: platform: " Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 15:35 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 15:35 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 15:57 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 15:57 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 17:09 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 17:09 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 7:10 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 7:10 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 10:58 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 10:58 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 10:58 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:18 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:18 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:18 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 11:24 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:24 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:24 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 11:33 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 13:22 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 13:22 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-07 13:22 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 4/6] KVM: create kvm_irqfd.h Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 5/6] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Eric Auger 2015-07-06 12:11 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 8:47 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 8:47 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 8:47 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 9:05 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 9:05 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 9:05 ` Eric Auger 2015-07-07 9:13 ` Wu, Feng [this message] 2015-07-07 9:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 9:13 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-07 17:17 ` [RFC v2 0/6] IRQ bypass manager and irqfd consumer Alex Williamson 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 12:28 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 12:28 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 14:13 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 14:13 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-09 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini 2015-07-09 15:34 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 15:34 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 15:34 ` Joerg Roedel 2015-07-09 16:06 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 16:06 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-09 16:06 ` Alex Williamson 2015-07-24 1:27 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-24 1:27 ` Wu, Feng 2015-07-24 1:27 ` Wu, Feng
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0025F2CF8@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \ --to=feng.wu@intel.com \ --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \ --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \ --cc=b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com \ --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \ --cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \ --cc=eric.auger@st.com \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \ --cc=patches@linaro.org \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.