From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>, Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:30:38 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <559F82AE.8070108@samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1436456621-29839-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> On 10.07.2015 00:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the > arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock > configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. > > Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > index cae2c048..3071260 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > @@ -1396,6 +1396,45 @@ static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > { 0 }, > }; > > +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4212_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, > + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, > + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, > + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, > + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, > + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, > + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 0 }, > +}; > + > +#define E4412_CPU_DIV1(cores, hpm, copy) \ > + (((cores) << 8) | ((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0)) > + > +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4412_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(7, 0, 6), }, > + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 6), }, > + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 5), }, > + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 5), }, > + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 4), }, > + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 4), }, > + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 3), }, > + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, > + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, > + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, > + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, > + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, > + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, > + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4412_CPU_DIV1(0, 0, 3), }, > + { 0 }, > +}; Numbers look fine! > + > /* register exynos4 clocks */ > static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > enum exynos4_soc soc) > @@ -1489,6 +1528,17 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx, > exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks)); > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) { The driver uses here enum exynos4_soc to differentiate between SoC (unless I missed some changes). This of_machine_is_compatible() makes sense but introduces inconsistency. I would prefer sticking to one convention: always enum or switch everything (before this patch) to of_compatible. Best regards, Krzysztof > + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", > + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, > + e4412_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4412_armclk_d), > + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); > + } else { > + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", > + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, > + e4212_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4212_armclk_d), > + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); > + } > } > > samsung_clk_register_alias(ctx, exynos4_aliases, >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:30:38 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <559F82AE.8070108@samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1436456621-29839-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> On 10.07.2015 00:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the > arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock > configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. > > Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > index cae2c048..3071260 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > @@ -1396,6 +1396,45 @@ static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > { 0 }, > }; > > +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4212_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, > + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, > + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, > + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, > + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, > + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, > + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 0 }, > +}; > + > +#define E4412_CPU_DIV1(cores, hpm, copy) \ > + (((cores) << 8) | ((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0)) > + > +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4412_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(7, 0, 6), }, > + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 6), }, > + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 5), }, > + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 5), }, > + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 4), }, > + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 4), }, > + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 3), }, > + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, > + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, > + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, > + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, > + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, > + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, > + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4412_CPU_DIV1(0, 0, 3), }, > + { 0 }, > +}; Numbers look fine! > + > /* register exynos4 clocks */ > static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > enum exynos4_soc soc) > @@ -1489,6 +1528,17 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx, > exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks)); > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) { The driver uses here enum exynos4_soc to differentiate between SoC (unless I missed some changes). This of_machine_is_compatible() makes sense but introduces inconsistency. I would prefer sticking to one convention: always enum or switch everything (before this patch) to of_compatible. Best regards, Krzysztof > + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", > + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, > + e4412_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4412_armclk_d), > + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); > + } else { > + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", > + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, > + e4212_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4212_armclk_d), > + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); > + } > } > > samsung_clk_register_alias(ctx, exynos4_aliases, >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 8:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-07-09 15:43 [PATCH v2 0/7] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] opp: add dev_pm_opp_get_turbo_mode_setting() helper Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 2:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 2:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-27 8:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 8:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: opp: fix handling of turbo modes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 2:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 2:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-27 8:35 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 8:35 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 10:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 10:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 11:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 11:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 11:36 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 11:36 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 11:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 11:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-30 14:37 ` Kukjin Kim 2015-07-30 14:37 ` Kukjin Kim 2015-07-31 18:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-31 18:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-08-04 1:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-08-04 1:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] cpufreq-dt: add turbo modes support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 8:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 8:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-27 8:37 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 8:37 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 11:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 11:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 11:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 11:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 11:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 11:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 12:01 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 12:01 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 8:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message] 2015-07-10 8:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 16:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-07-10 16:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-07-11 6:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-11 6:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-15 9:58 ` Sylwester nawrocki 2015-07-15 9:58 ` Sylwester nawrocki 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ARM: dts: Exynos4x12: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 8:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 8:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4x12 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 8:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 15:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-10 8:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-07-10 8:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=559F82AE.8070108@samsung.com \ --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \ --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \ --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=javier@dowhile0.org \ --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \ --cc=kgene@kernel.org \ --cc=khilman@linaro.org \ --cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \ --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \ --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \ --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \ --cc=tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de \ --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \ --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.