teuthology rados runs for next

teuthology rados runs for next

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]

Hi Sam,

I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it also significantly delays them. What do you think ?

Cheers
-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: teuthology rados runs for next

[Sage Weil]

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> 
> I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is 
> lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we 
> kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the 
> results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it 
> also significantly delays them. What do you think ?

I think it's better to kill old scheduled runs.

Re: teuthology rados runs for next

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

Ok !

teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-18_21:00:09-rados-next-distro-basic-multi
teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-20_21:00:09-rados-next-distro-basic-multi

I observed that the older 

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-17_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-basic-multi

is half way through but does not seem to make progress while the one scheduled today

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-19_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-basic-multi

has one job running. Do you think best to kill the newer so it does not compete for resources that would prevent the older from finishing ? I'd be tempted to kill the newer because it's so difficult to get jobs running right now that it makes sense to preserve a run that already managed to pass > 100 jobs :-)

Cheers

On 21/07/2015 15:43, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is 
>> lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we 
>> kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the 
>> results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it 
>> also significantly delays them. What do you think ?
> 
> I think it's better to kill old scheduled runs.
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]