* teuthology rados runs for next @ 2015-07-21 8:44 Loic Dachary 2015-07-21 13:43 ` Sage Weil 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-07-21 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Samuel Just; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --] Hi Sam, I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it also significantly delays them. What do you think ? Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: teuthology rados runs for next 2015-07-21 8:44 teuthology rados runs for next Loic Dachary @ 2015-07-21 13:43 ` Sage Weil 2015-07-21 15:42 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Sage Weil @ 2015-07-21 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Samuel Just, Ceph Development On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is > lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we > kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the > results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it > also significantly delays them. What do you think ? I think it's better to kill old scheduled runs. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: teuthology rados runs for next 2015-07-21 13:43 ` Sage Weil @ 2015-07-21 15:42 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-07-21 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Samuel Just, Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --] Ok ! teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-18_21:00:09-rados-next-distro-basic-multi teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-20_21:00:09-rados-next-distro-basic-multi I observed that the older http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-17_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-basic-multi is half way through but does not seem to make progress while the one scheduled today http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-19_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-basic-multi has one job running. Do you think best to kill the newer so it does not compete for resources that would prevent the older from finishing ? I'd be tempted to kill the newer because it's so difficult to get jobs running right now that it makes sense to preserve a run that already managed to pass > 100 jobs :-) Cheers On 21/07/2015 15:43, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >> I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is >> lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we >> kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the >> results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it >> also significantly delays them. What do you think ? > > I think it's better to kill old scheduled runs. > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-21 15:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-07-21 8:44 teuthology rados runs for next Loic Dachary 2015-07-21 13:43 ` Sage Weil 2015-07-21 15:42 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.