All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	bcousson@baylibre.com, ptitiano@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] hwmon: ina2xx: convert driver to using regmap
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:23:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5630942F.1020705@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028024711.GA30927@roeck-us.net>

On 28/10/2015 03:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Marc Titinger wrote:
>> Any sysfs "show" read access from the client app will result in reading
>> all registers (8 with ina226). Depending on the host this can limit the
>> best achievable read rate.
>>
>> This changeset allows for individual register accesses through regmap.
>>
>> Tested with BeagleBone Black (Baylibre-ACME) and ina226.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>
>>    v2:
>> 	- rename 'rv' to 'regval' for clarity
>> 	- fix missed smbus_xxx api change to regmap
>> 	- rename ina2xx_do_update to ina2xx_read_reg
>> 	- fix indentation
>>
>>   drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c b/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c
>> index 4d28150..5e7ada8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c
>
> [ ... ]
>>
>> -	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>>   	data->rshunt = val;
>>   	status = ina2xx_calibrate(data);
>> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>
> I think this can result in a race conditon if multiple processes
> try to update the shunt resistor value at the same time in a
> multi-core system. There is no guarantee that the value programmed
> into the chip matches the value that is written into 'rshunt'.
> So I think we still need the mutex, unless you have a better
> idea how to avoid the race.
>
Right, I had that same afterthought when removing the mutex at that 
position. Fix incoming!

M.


> Thanks,
> Guenter
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	bcousson@baylibre.com, ptitiano@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/2] hwmon: ina2xx: convert driver to using regmap
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:23:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5630942F.1020705@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028024711.GA30927@roeck-us.net>

On 28/10/2015 03:47, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Marc Titinger wrote:
>> Any sysfs "show" read access from the client app will result in reading
>> all registers (8 with ina226). Depending on the host this can limit the
>> best achievable read rate.
>>
>> This changeset allows for individual register accesses through regmap.
>>
>> Tested with BeagleBone Black (Baylibre-ACME) and ina226.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>
>>    v2:
>> 	- rename 'rv' to 'regval' for clarity
>> 	- fix missed smbus_xxx api change to regmap
>> 	- rename ina2xx_do_update to ina2xx_read_reg
>> 	- fix indentation
>>
>>   drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c b/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c
>> index 4d28150..5e7ada8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ina2xx.c
>
> [ ... ]
>>
>> -	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>>   	data->rshunt = val;
>>   	status = ina2xx_calibrate(data);
>> -	mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>
> I think this can result in a race conditon if multiple processes
> try to update the shunt resistor value at the same time in a
> multi-core system. There is no guarantee that the value programmed
> into the chip matches the value that is written into 'rshunt'.
> So I think we still need the mutex, unless you have a better
> idea how to avoid the race.
>
Right, I had that same afterthought when removing the mutex at that 
position. Fix incoming!

M.


> Thanks,
> Guenter
>


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-28  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19 16:21 [RFC] hwmon: ina2xx: allow for actual measurement bandwidth above 160 Hz Marc Titinger
2015-10-19 16:21 ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20  1:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20  1:32   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20  7:58   ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-20  7:58     ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20  8:20   ` [PATCH v2] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20  8:20     ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 12:54     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 12:54       ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 13:17       ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 13:17         ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 13:30         ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 13:30           ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 13:46           ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 13:46             ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 17:00             ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 17:00               ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-21  7:46               ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-21  7:46                 ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 13:52           ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-20 13:52             ` [lm-sensors] " Michael Turquette
2015-10-23 16:13       ` [RFC] hwmon: ina2xx: port to using remap, improve bandwidth Marc Titinger
2015-10-23 16:13         ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-23 16:49         ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 16:49           ` [lm-sensors] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 16:52         ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 16:52           ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 20:35           ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-23 20:35             ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-24  2:21             ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-24  2:21               ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-24 12:45             ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-24 12:45               ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-26 16:24               ` [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: ina2xx: convert driver to using regmap Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24                 ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24               ` [PATCH 1/2] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24                 ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27  1:02                 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27  1:02                   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27  1:12                 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27  1:12                   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27  9:51                   ` [PATCH v2 " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27  9:51                     ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-28  2:47                     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-28  2:47                       ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-28  9:23                       ` Marc Titinger [this message]
2015-10-28  9:23                         ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24               ` [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: ina2xx: give precedence to DT over checking for platform data Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24                 ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27  1:10                 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27  1:10                   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27  9:51                   ` [PATCH v2 " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27  9:51                     ` [lm-sensors] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-23 16:55         ` [RFC] hwmon: ina2xx: port to using remap, improve bandwidth kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 16:55           ` [lm-sensors] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 20:10         ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 20:10           ` [lm-sensors] " kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5630942F.1020705@baylibre.com \
    --to=mtitinger@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=ptitiano@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.