* [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
@ 2015-12-18 8:03 osstest service owner
2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: osstest service owner @ 2015-12-18 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel, osstest-admin
flight 66454 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/66454/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
build-i386-xsm 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 66415
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail like 66415
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 66415
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
build-i386-rumpuserxen 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 11 guest-start fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 7458d585358834cfb6c6fabb02009a646d42f105
baseline version:
xen 18fcef8d62b28766e7b373a71d54bcf7578cea23
Last test of basis 66415 2015-12-16 04:50:52 Z 2 days
Testing same since 66454 2015-12-17 07:52:08 Z 1 days 1 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
jobs:
build-amd64-xsm pass
build-armhf-xsm pass
build-i386-xsm fail
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 fail
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-armhf-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt blocked
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-prev pass
build-i386-prev pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
build-amd64-rumpuserxen pass
build-i386-rumpuserxen blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm fail
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 blocked
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt fail
test-amd64-i386-libvirt blocked
test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade pass
test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 blocked
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
(No revision log; it would be 425 lines long.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 8:03 [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
@ 2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 11:50 ` Ian Campbell
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-12-18 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Goldstein; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
>>> On 18.12.15 at 09:03, <osstest-admin@xenproject.org> wrote:
> flight 66454 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/66454/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-i386 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
> build-i386-xsm 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
Doug,
this needs fixing:
***
*** Can't find default configuration "arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig"!
***
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -O0 -g3 -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xc_core.o.d -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../../xen/common/libelf -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes -I. -I./include -I/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/include -pthread -include /home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/config.h -c -o xc_core.o xc_core.c
make[2]: *** [defconfig] Error 1
make[1]: *** [.config] Error 2
make: *** [install-xen] Error 2
Previously build attempts on ix86 resulted in no error, with just
*** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!
printed.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-12-18 11:50 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-12-18 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Doug Goldstein; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 04:02 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Previously build attempts on ix86 resulted in no error, with just
>
> *** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!
As an aside, could we drop the *** there, or make it something else?
When I look at build failure logs I usually look for the *** which make
prints on fail, and for x86_32 I always get to this first.
It's clearly an infinitesimal annoyance, but still..
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 11:50 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-12-18 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-12-18 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, Doug Goldstein, osstest-admin
>>> On 18.12.15 at 12:50, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 04:02 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Previously build attempts on ix86 resulted in no error, with just
>>
>> *** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!
>
> As an aside, could we drop the *** there, or make it something else?
>
> When I look at build failure logs I usually look for the *** which make
> prints on fail, and for x86_32 I always get to this first.
Since it is sort of a build failure, I think Keir intentionally wrote it
that way. But I'm not really opposed to dropping the stars, if
they're getting in the way.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 11:50 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-12-18 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-18 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 13:33 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:08 ` Doug Goldstein
2015-12-18 20:53 ` [PATCH] build: add support configuring for x86_32 Doug Goldstein
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-12-18 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Doug Goldstein; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
On 18/12/15 11:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.12.15 at 09:03, <osstest-admin@xenproject.org> wrote:
>> flight 66454 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/66454/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> build-i386 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
>> build-i386-xsm 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
> Doug,
>
> this needs fixing:
>
> ***
> *** Can't find default configuration "arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig"!
> ***
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
> gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -O0 -g3 -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xc_core.o.d -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../../xen/common/libelf -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes -I. -I./include -I/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/include -pthread -include /home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/config.h -c -o xc_core.o xc_core.c
> make[2]: *** [defconfig] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [.config] Error 2
> make: *** [install-xen] Error 2
>
> Previously build attempts on ix86 resulted in no error, with just
>
> *** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!
I realise this is a break from before and wants fixing on those grounds.
However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a 32bit
hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a bug
there as well.
Independently of not falling over a missing defconfig, the following code
ifneq ($(XEN_TARGET_ARCH),x86_32)
$(MAKE) -f Rules.mk _$@
else
echo "*** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!"
endif
Really needs to have an hard failure in it. In fact, that is probably
the correct fix in this circumstance.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-12-18 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 13:33 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-12-18 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Goldstein, Andrew Cooper; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
>>> On 18.12.15 at 14:19, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a 32bit
> hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a bug
> there as well.
>
> Independently of not falling over a missing defconfig, the following code
>
> ifneq ($(XEN_TARGET_ARCH),x86_32)
> $(MAKE) -f Rules.mk _$@
> else
> echo "*** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!"
> endif
>
> Really needs to have an hard failure in it.
Why? Doing a simple make from top level should be fine (building
the tools, and ignoring the hypervisor).
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-18 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-12-18 13:33 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-12-18 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, Doug Goldstein; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 13:19 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a 32bit
> hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a bug
> there as well.
It is doing a build because it wants the 32 bit tools and it just does a
make dist. This is perfectly fine behaviour IMHO.
> Independently of not falling over a missing defconfig, the following code
>
> ifneq ($(XEN_TARGET_ARCH),x86_32)
> $(MAKE) -f Rules.mk _$@
> else
> echo "*** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!"
> endif
>
> Really needs to have an hard failure in it. In fact, that is probably
> the correct fix in this circumstance.
Nack unless make dist/world/etc are all fixed to do the right thing and can
be made to do so in an acceptable (i.e. no hackier than the above) way in
the common code.
Personally other than the message itself I don't think anything has to
change, i.e. it's not worth anyone's effort to fix what you are complaining
about.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 11:50 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-12-18 14:08 ` Doug Goldstein
2015-12-18 20:53 ` [PATCH] build: add support configuring for x86_32 Doug Goldstein
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Doug Goldstein @ 2015-12-18 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]
On 12/18/15 5:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.12.15 at 09:03, <osstest-admin@xenproject.org> wrote:
>> flight 66454 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/66454/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> build-i386 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
>> build-i386-xsm 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 66415
>
> Doug,
>
> this needs fixing:
>
> ***
> *** Can't find default configuration "arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig"!
> ***
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
> gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -O0 -g3 -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xc_core.o.d -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../../xen/common/libelf -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes -I. -I./include -I/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/include -pthread -include /home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/config.h -c -o xc_core.o xc_core.c
> make[2]: *** [defconfig] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [.config] Error 2
> make: *** [install-xen] Error 2
>
> Previously build attempts on ix86 resulted in no error, with just
>
> *** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!
>
> printed.
>
> Jan
>
Sure not a problem. I actually had this support in there but one of the
early review comments was to drop x86_32 support (you'll notice I
mention it in the changelog for v2).
--
Doug Goldstein
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 13:33 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-12-18 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-18 14:24 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2015-12-18 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell, Jan Beulich, Doug Goldstein; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
On 18/12/15 13:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a 32bit
>> > hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a bug
>> > there as well.
> It is doing a build because it wants the 32 bit tools and it just does a
> make dist. This is perfectly fine behaviour IMHO.
>
Then "make dist" needs fixing. It is not fine to have the Xen component
silently succeed and do nothing when asked to compile an invalid
combination.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2015-12-18 14:24 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-12-18 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, Doug Goldstein; +Cc: xen-devel, osstest-admin
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 14:15 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/12/15 13:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a
> > > 32bit
> > > > hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a
> > > > bug
> > > > there as well.
> > It is doing a build because it wants the 32 bit tools and it just does
> > a
> > make dist. This is perfectly fine behaviour IMHO.
> >
>
> Then "make dist" needs fixing. It is not fine to have the Xen component
> silently succeed and do nothing when asked to compile an invalid
> combination.
Feel free to change it, IMHO it's not that important.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
2015-12-18 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-18 14:24 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-12-18 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-12-18 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, Doug Goldstein, osstest-admin
>>> On 18.12.15 at 15:15, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 18/12/15 13:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a 32bit
>>> > hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a bug
>>> > there as well.
>> It is doing a build because it wants the 32 bit tools and it just does a
>> make dist. This is perfectly fine behaviour IMHO.
>
> Then "make dist" needs fixing. It is not fine to have the Xen component
> silently succeed and do nothing when asked to compile an invalid
> combination.
Yet that would likely be more of a makefile hack than how things
get done now. I agree with Ian in not seeing why you think this
is so bad a problem.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] build: add support configuring for x86_32
2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-12-18 14:08 ` Doug Goldstein
@ 2015-12-18 20:53 ` Doug Goldstein
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Doug Goldstein @ 2015-12-18 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Doug Goldstein, Jan Beulich
This will allow OSSTest to run `make dist` for XEN_TARGET_ARCH=x86_32
but will still not build the hypervisor for x86_32.
Fixes: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/66454/
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig b/xen/arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
--
2.4.10
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-18 20:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-18 8:03 [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2015-12-18 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 11:50 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-18 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 13:33 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-18 14:24 ` Ian Campbell
2015-12-18 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-18 14:08 ` Doug Goldstein
2015-12-18 20:53 ` [PATCH] build: add support configuring for x86_32 Doug Goldstein
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.