All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Is: PVH dom0 - MWAIT detection logic to get deeper C-states exposed in ACPI AML code. Was:Re: [PATCH v2 10/30] xen/x86: Annotate VM applicability in featureset
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:24:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C5F04A.2020809@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C5DF5F.10200@citrix.com>



On 02/18/2016 10:12 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/02/16 15:02, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 17/2/16 a les 20:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:41:41PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 15/02/16 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15.02.16 at 15:53, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/02/16 14:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 15.02.16 at 15:38, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15/02/16 09:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12.02.16 at 18:42, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/02/16 17:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05.02.16 at 14:42, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>   #define X86_FEATURE_MWAITX        ( 3*32+29) /*   MWAIT extension
>>>>>>>>>> (MONITORX/MWAITX) */
>>>>>>>>>>> Why not exposed to HVM (also for _MWAIT as I now notice)?
>>>>>>>>>> Because that is a good chunk of extra work to support.  We would need to
>>>>>>>>>> use 4K monitor widths, and extra p2m handling.
>>>>>>>>> I don't understand: The base (_MWAIT) feature being exposed to
>>>>>>>>> guests today, and kernels making use of the feature when available
>>>>>>>>> suggests to me that things work. Are you saying you know
>>>>>>>>> otherwise? (And if there really is a reason to mask the feature all of
>>>>>>>>> the sudden, this should again be justified in the commit message.)
>>>>>>>> PV guests had it clobbered by Xen in traps.c
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HVM guests have:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vmx.c:
>>>>>>>>      case EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION:
>>>>>>>>      case EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION:
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>      hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
>>>>>>>>          break;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and svm.c:
>>>>>>>>      case VMEXIT_MONITOR:
>>>>>>>>      case VMEXIT_MWAIT:
>>>>>>>>          hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
>>>>>>>>          break;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't see how a guest could actually use this feature.
>>>>>>> Do you see the respective intercepts getting enabled anywhere?
>>>>>>> (I don't outside of nested code, which I didn't check in detail.)
>>>>>> Yes - the intercepts are always enabled to prevent the guest actually
>>>>>> putting the processor to sleep.
>>>>> Hmm, you're right, somehow I've managed to ignore the relevant
>>>>> lines grep reported. Yet - how do things work then, without the
>>>>> MWAIT feature flag currently getting cleared?
>>>> I have never observed it being used.  Do you have some local patches in
>>>> the SLES hypervisor?
>>>>
>>>> There is some gross layer violation in xen/enlighten.c to pretend that
>>>> MWAIT is present to trick the ACPI code into evaluating _CST() methods
>>>> to report back to Xen.  (This is yet another PV-ism which will cause a
>>>> headache for a DMLite dom0)
>>> Yes indeed. CC-ing Roger, and Boris.
>> Yes, all this is indeed not very nice, and we would ideally like to get
>> rid of it on PVHv2.

We will have to come up with something else: AIUI the whole point of 
xen_check_mwait() is to come up with proper ECX and EDX values for the 
MWAIT CPUID leaf. Those value are expected to be reported from 
xen_cpuid() pv_op so that acpi_processor_ffh_state_probe_cpu() can set C 
states structures properly.

The problem is that PVH executes CPUID instruction natively. (And so 
this must have been broken on PVHv1 as well).

-boris


>>
>> Could we use the acpica tools (acpidump/acpixtract/acpiexec/...) in
>> order to fetch this information from user-space and send it to Xen using
>> privcmd?
>>
>> AFAIK those tools work on most OSes (or at least the ones we care about
>> as Dom0).
> In general, we can't rely on userspace evaluation of AML.
>
> For trivial AML which evaluates to a constant, it could be interpreted
> by userspace, but anything accessing system resources will need
> evaluating by the kernel.
>
> ~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-18 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 139+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-05 13:41 [PATCH RFC v2 00/30] x86: Improvements to cpuid handling for guests Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] xen/x86: Drop X86_FEATURE_3DNOW_ALT Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] xen/x86: Do not store VIA/Cyrix/Centaur CPU features Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] xen/x86: Drop cpuinfo_x86.x86_power Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] xen/x86: Improvements to pv_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/public: Export cpu featureset information in the public API Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:27   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:08     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 13:34       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-19 17:29   ` Joao Martins
2016-02-19 17:55     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-19 22:03       ` Joao Martins
2016-02-20 16:17         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-20 17:39           ` Joao Martins
2016-02-20 19:17             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-22 18:50               ` Joao Martins
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] xen/x86: Script to automatically process featureset information Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:36   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 16:43     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] xen/x86: Collect more cpuid feature leaves Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:38   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] xen/x86: Mask out unknown features from Xen's capabilities Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 16:48     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 17:14       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:12         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] xen/x86: Store antifeatures inverted in a featureset Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:47   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 16:50     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 17:15       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] xen/x86: Annotate VM applicability in featureset Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 17:05   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 17:42     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15  9:20       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 14:38         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:50           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 14:53             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:02               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:41                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 19:02                   ` Is: PVH dom0 - MWAIT detection logic to get deeper C-states exposed in ACPI AML code. Was:Re: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-17 19:58                     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-18 15:02                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-02-18 15:12                       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18 16:24                         ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-02-18 16:48                           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18 17:03                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-02-18 22:08                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-18 15:16                       ` David Vrabel
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] xen/x86: Calculate maximum host and guest featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 13:37   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 14:57     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:07       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:52         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] xen/x86: Generate deep dependencies of features Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:06   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:28     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:52       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 16:09         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 16:27           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 19:07             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16  9:54               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:25                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 10:42                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] xen/x86: Clear dependent features when clearing a cpu cap Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:53   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:56   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] xen/x86: Improve disabling of features which have dependencies Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] xen/x86: Improvements to in-hypervisor cpuid sanity checks Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 17:12     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16 10:06       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:43         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 10:55           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 14:02             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 14:45               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:17                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18 13:23                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] x86/cpu: Move set_cpumask() calls into c_early_init() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16 14:10   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:45     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 10:58       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:41         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] x86/cpu: Common infrastructure for levelling context switching Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16 14:15   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17  8:15     ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:46       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 19:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] x86/cpu: Rework AMD masking MSR setup Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  7:40   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:56     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] x86/cpu: Rework Intel masking/faulting setup Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  7:57   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:59     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] x86/cpu: Context switch cpuid masks and faulting state in context_switch() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  8:06   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] x86/pv: Provide custom cpumasks for PV domains Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  8:13   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 11:03     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 11:14       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:48         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] x86/domctl: Update PV domain cpumasks when setting cpuid policy Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  8:22   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 12:13     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] xen+tools: Export maximum host and guest cpu featuresets via SYSCTL Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-17  8:30   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 12:17     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 12:23       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] tools/libxc: Modify bitmap operations to take void pointers Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-08 11:40     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-08 16:23   ` Tim Deegan
2016-02-08 16:36     ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-10 10:07       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-10 10:18         ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-18 13:37           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 20:06         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] tools/libxc: Use public/featureset.h for cpuid policy generation Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] tools/libxc: Expose the automatically generated cpu featuremask information Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 16:15     ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] tools: Utility for dealing with featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:13   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] tools/libxc: Wire a featureset through to cpuid policy logic Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:13   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] tools/libxc: Use featuresets rather than guesswork Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:13   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-17  8:55   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:03     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 13:19       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] tools/libxc: Calculate xstate cpuid leaf from guest information Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 14:28   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 15:22     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-08 17:26 ` [PATCH v2.5 31/30] Fix PV guest XSAVE handling with levelling Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  9:02   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:06     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 13:36       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C5F04A.2020809@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.