From: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: tbaicar@codeaurora.org, james.morse@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com,
lv.zheng@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
kristina.martsenko@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org,
punit.agrawal@arm.com, stephen.boyd@linaro.org,
kamensky@cisco.com, prarit@redhat.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
devel@acpica.org, Wuquanming <wuquanming@huawei.com>,
Huangshaoyu <huangshaoyu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:27:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577d79ad-9357-ea40-63eb-1d2988642710@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018101722.kce2tcvpd7xdpo46@pd.tnic>
On 2017/10/18 18:17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:04:28AM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> ARM does not have ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI notification, which should only
>> used by x86. In the code, I see those guards are never used.
> Yeah, I see it now.
Borislav/Rafael,
For this patch(the first one), whether it can be firstly applied?
This patch is code clean and not related with the second one.
For the second, I may discuss more with James.
Thanks so much in advance.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<will.deacon@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<robert.moore@intel.com>, <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
<mingo@kernel.org>, <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
<stephen.boyd@linaro.org>, <kamensky@cisco.com>,
<prarit@redhat.com>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<devel@acpica.org>, Wuquanming <wuquanming@huawei.com>,
Huangshaoyu <huangshaoyu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:27:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577d79ad-9357-ea40-63eb-1d2988642710@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018101722.kce2tcvpd7xdpo46@pd.tnic>
On 2017/10/18 18:17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:04:28AM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> ARM does not have ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI notification, which should only
>> used by x86. In the code, I see those guards are never used.
> Yeah, I see it now.
Borislav/Rafael,
For this patch(the first one), whether it can be firstly applied?
This patch is code clean and not related with the second one.
For the second, I may discuss more with James.
Thanks so much in advance.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gengdongjiu@huawei.com (gengdongjiu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:27:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577d79ad-9357-ea40-63eb-1d2988642710@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018101722.kce2tcvpd7xdpo46@pd.tnic>
On 2017/10/18 18:17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:04:28AM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> ARM does not have ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI notification, which should only
>> used by x86. In the code, I see those guards are never used.
> Yeah, I see it now.
Borislav/Rafael,
For this patch(the first one), whether it can be firstly applied?
This patch is code clean and not related with the second one.
For the second, I may discuss more with James.
Thanks so much in advance.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu at huawei.com>
To: devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:27:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577d79ad-9357-ea40-63eb-1d2988642710@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20171018101722.kce2tcvpd7xdpo46@pd.tnic
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 529 bytes --]
On 2017/10/18 18:17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:04:28AM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> ARM does not have ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI notification, which should only
>> used by x86. In the code, I see those guards are never used.
> Yeah, I see it now.
Borislav/Rafael,
For this patch(the first one), whether it can be firstly applied?
This patch is code clean and not related with the second one.
For the second, I may discuss more with James.
Thanks so much in advance.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 8:02 [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type Dongjiu Geng
2017-10-17 8:02 ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-10-17 8:02 ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-10-17 8:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8 Dongjiu Geng
2017-10-17 8:02 ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-10-17 8:02 ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-10-17 17:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 17:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 5:00 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 5:00 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 5:00 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 5:00 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 9:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 9:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 9:17 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 9:17 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 9:17 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 9:17 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 9:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 9:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 9:44 ` James Morse
2017-10-18 9:44 ` [Devel] " James Morse
2017-10-18 9:44 ` James Morse
2017-10-18 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 10:25 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:25 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:25 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:25 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:21 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:21 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:21 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:21 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:26 ` James Morse
2017-10-18 10:26 ` [Devel] " James Morse
2017-10-18 10:26 ` James Morse
2017-10-18 11:39 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 11:39 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 11:39 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 11:39 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-17 14:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA/NMI notification type Tyler Baicar
2017-10-17 14:06 ` Tyler Baicar
2017-10-17 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-17 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 3:04 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 3:04 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 3:04 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 3:04 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 12:27 ` gengdongjiu [this message]
2017-10-18 12:27 ` [Devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 12:27 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 12:27 ` gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-18 15:14 gengdongjiu
2017-10-18 15:14 ` gengdongjiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577d79ad-9357-ea40-63eb-1d2988642710@huawei.com \
--to=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=huangshaoyu@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kamensky@cisco.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wuquanming@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.