* Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file
@ 2022-03-29 8:33 Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-03-29 19:21 ` Robert Schlabbach
2022-03-29 21:33 ` Piotr Chmura
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-29 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Robert Schlabbach
Cc: regressions, az0123456, Linux Media Mailing List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody
acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided
to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant
here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 :
> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in linux 5.17:
> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50'
> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware
> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file.
Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere
else already? Or even fixed?
Anyway, to get this tracked:
#regzbot introduced: v5.16..v5.17
#regzbot from: az0123456@gmx.de <az0123456@gmx.de>
#regzbot title: media: si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file
#regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of
reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack
knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately
will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope
that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me
in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record
straight.
--
Additional information about regzbot:
If you want to know more about regzbot, check out its web-interface, the
getting start guide, and the references documentation:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/
https://gitlab.com/knurd42/regzbot/-/blob/main/docs/getting_started.md
https://gitlab.com/knurd42/regzbot/-/blob/main/docs/reference.md
The last two documents will explain how you can interact with regzbot
yourself if your want to.
Hint for reporters: when reporting a regression it's in your interest to
CC the regression list and tell regzbot about the issue, as that ensures
the regression makes it onto the radar of the Linux kernel's regression
tracker -- that's in your interest, as it ensures your report won't fall
through the cracks unnoticed.
Hint for developers: you normally don't need to care about regzbot once
it's involved. Fix the issue as you normally would, just remember to
include 'Link:' tag in the patch descriptions pointing to all reports
about the issue. This has been expected from developers even before
regzbot showed up for reasons explained in
'Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst' and
'Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-29 8:33 Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-29 19:21 ` Robert Schlabbach 2022-03-30 9:55 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-29 21:33 ` Piotr Chmura 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Robert Schlabbach @ 2022-03-29 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List Hi Thorsten, the patch linked in the bugzilla ticket: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ should indeed fix the issue. The error was that the rom_id and required fields were swapped in the table, so the non-zero rom_id was taken as a "true" required boolean value, thus incorrectly evaluating that the chip requires a firmware file to operate when in fact it does not. I have tested the patch and found it worked for me. But I do not know how to push this further along: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ Best Regards, -Robert Schlabbach Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. März 2022 um 10:33 Uhr Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> An: "Antti Palosaari" <crope@iki.fi>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>, "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net> Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, az0123456@gmx.de, "Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Betreff: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : > I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in linux 5.17: > si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' > si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware > I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere else already? Or even fixed? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-29 19:21 ` Robert Schlabbach @ 2022-03-30 9:55 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-30 10:35 ` Piotr Chmura 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-30 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Schlabbach Cc: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, chmooreck On 29.03.22 21:21, Robert Schlabbach wrote: > > the patch linked in the bugzilla ticket: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ > should indeed fix the issue. Ahh, the comment mentioning it was added shortly after I sent my mail. #regzbot monitor: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ Adding Piotr, the patches' author to the CC, who also replied. BTW: that patch is afaics missing a Fixes tag specifying the culprit and a `Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17.x` tag to make sure it's quickly backported to the stable tree, as among others explained here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst > The error was that the rom_id and required > fields were swapped in the table, so the non-zero rom_id was taken as a > "true" required boolean value, thus incorrectly evaluating that the > chip requires a firmware file to operate when in fact it does not. > I have tested the patch and found it worked for me. But I do not know > how to push this further along: > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ Mauro, what's up here? The patch fixes a regression and thus afaics should quickly find its way towards mainline to get it into the stable tree, as explained in the (bran new) document linked above. Ciao, Thorsten > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. März 2022 um 10:33 Uhr > Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> > An: "Antti Palosaari" <crope@iki.fi>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>, "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net> > Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, az0123456@gmx.de, "Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Betreff: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. > > I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody > acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided > to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant > here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : > >> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in linux 5.17: >> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' >> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware >> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. > > Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere > else already? Or even fixed? > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-30 9:55 ` Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-30 10:35 ` Piotr Chmura 2022-03-30 10:44 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Piotr Chmura @ 2022-03-30 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Robert Schlabbach Cc: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List W dniu 30.03.2022 o 11:55, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: > On 29.03.22 21:21, Robert Schlabbach wrote: >> the patch linked in the bugzilla ticket: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >> should indeed fix the issue. > Ahh, the comment mentioning it was added shortly after I sent my mail. > #regzbot monitor: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ > > Adding Piotr, the patches' author to the CC, who also replied. > > BTW: that patch is afaics missing a Fixes tag specifying the culprit and > a `Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17.x` tag to make sure it's quickly > backported to the stable tree, as among others explained here: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst Sorry for my inconvenience. I just fixed my device and wanted to share solution with the "world". I'm not familiar with all kernel development convention (yet). > >> The error was that the rom_id and required >> fields were swapped in the table, so the non-zero rom_id was taken as a >> "true" required boolean value, thus incorrectly evaluating that the >> chip requires a firmware file to operate when in fact it does not. >> I have tested the patch and found it worked for me. But I do not know >> how to push this further along: >> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ > Mauro, what's up here? The patch fixes a regression and thus afaics > should quickly find its way towards mainline to get it into the stable > tree, as explained in the (bran new) document linked above. > > Ciao, Thorsten > >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. März 2022 um 10:33 Uhr >> Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> >> An: "Antti Palosaari" <crope@iki.fi>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>, "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net> >> Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, az0123456@gmx.de, "Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> >> Betreff: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file >> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >> >> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody >> acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided >> to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant >> here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : >> >>> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in linux 5.17: >>> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' >>> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware >>> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. >> Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere >> else already? Or even fixed? >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-30 10:35 ` Piotr Chmura @ 2022-03-30 10:44 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-30 15:47 ` Piotr Chmura 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-30 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Piotr Chmura, Robert Schlabbach Cc: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List On 30.03.22 12:35, Piotr Chmura wrote: > > W dniu 30.03.2022 o 11:55, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: >> On 29.03.22 21:21, Robert Schlabbach wrote: >>> the patch linked in the bugzilla ticket: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>> >>> should indeed fix the issue. >> Ahh, the comment mentioning it was added shortly after I sent my mail. >> #regzbot monitor: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >> >> >> Adding Piotr, the patches' author to the CC, who also replied. >> >> BTW: that patch is afaics missing a Fixes tag specifying the culprit and >> a `Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17.x` tag to make sure it's quickly >> backported to the stable tree, as among others explained here: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst >> > Sorry for my inconvenience. Don't worry, everything fine. In a case like... > I just fixed my device and wanted to share > solution with the "world". I'm not familiar with all kernel development > convention (yet). ...this someone else should point such details out to the submitter and/or add these tags when applying the patch. @Robert: Do you know which commit causes this regression and could tell us for a proper Fixes: tag? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. >>> The error was that the rom_id and required >>> fields were swapped in the table, so the non-zero rom_id was taken as a >>> "true" required boolean value, thus incorrectly evaluating that the >>> chip requires a firmware file to operate when in fact it does not. >>> I have tested the patch and found it worked for me. But I do not know >>> how to push this further along: >>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>> >> Mauro, what's up here? The patch fixes a regression and thus afaics >> should quickly find its way towards mainline to get it into the stable >> tree, as explained in the (bran new) document linked above. >> >> Ciao, Thorsten >> >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. März 2022 um 10:33 Uhr >>> Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> >>> An: "Antti Palosaari" <crope@iki.fi>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" >>> <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>, "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net> >>> Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, >>> az0123456@gmx.de, "Linux Media Mailing List" >>> <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" >>> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> >>> Betreff: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware >>> file >>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >>> >>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody >>> acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided >>> to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant >>> here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : >>> >>>> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in >>>> linux 5.17: >>>> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' >>>> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware >>>> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately >>>> the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. >>> Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere >>> else already? Or even fixed? >>> >>> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-30 10:44 ` Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-30 15:47 ` Piotr Chmura 2022-03-31 6:46 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Piotr Chmura @ 2022-03-30 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Robert Schlabbach Cc: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List W dniu 30.03.2022 o 12:44, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: > On 30.03.22 12:35, Piotr Chmura wrote: >> W dniu 30.03.2022 o 11:55, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: >>> On 29.03.22 21:21, Robert Schlabbach wrote: >>>> the patch linked in the bugzilla ticket: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>>> >>>> should indeed fix the issue. >>> Ahh, the comment mentioning it was added shortly after I sent my mail. >>> #regzbot monitor: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>> >>> >>> Adding Piotr, the patches' author to the CC, who also replied. >>> >>> BTW: that patch is afaics missing a Fixes tag specifying the culprit and >>> a `Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17.x` tag to make sure it's quickly >>> backported to the stable tree, as among others explained here: >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst >>> >> Sorry for my inconvenience. > Don't worry, everything fine. In a case like... > >> I just fixed my device and wanted to share >> solution with the "world". I'm not familiar with all kernel development >> convention (yet). > ...this someone else should point such details out to the submitter > and/or add these tags when applying the patch. > > @Robert: Do you know which commit causes this regression and could tell > us for a proper Fixes: tag? Fixes: 1c35ba3bf97213538b82067acc0f23f18e652226 Cheers, Piotr Chmura > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of > reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack > knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately > will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope > that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me > in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record > straight. > > >>>> The error was that the rom_id and required >>>> fields were swapped in the table, so the non-zero rom_id was taken as a >>>> "true" required boolean value, thus incorrectly evaluating that the >>>> chip requires a firmware file to operate when in fact it does not. >>>> I have tested the patch and found it worked for me. But I do not know >>>> how to push this further along: >>>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>>> >>> Mauro, what's up here? The patch fixes a regression and thus afaics >>> should quickly find its way towards mainline to get it into the stable >>> tree, as explained in the (bran new) document linked above. >>> >>> Ciao, Thorsten >>> >>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. März 2022 um 10:33 Uhr >>>> Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> >>>> An: "Antti Palosaari" <crope@iki.fi>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" >>>> <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>, "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net> >>>> Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, >>>> az0123456@gmx.de, "Linux Media Mailing List" >>>> <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" >>>> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> >>>> Betreff: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware >>>> file >>>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >>>> >>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody >>>> acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided >>>> to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant >>>> here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : >>>> >>>>> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in >>>>> linux 5.17: >>>>> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' >>>>> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware >>>>> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately >>>>> the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. >>>> Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere >>>> else already? Or even fixed? >>>> >>>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-30 15:47 ` Piotr Chmura @ 2022-03-31 6:46 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-03-31 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Piotr Chmura, Robert Schlabbach Cc: Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, regressions On 30.03.22 17:47, Piotr Chmura wrote: > W dniu 30.03.2022 o 12:44, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: >> On 30.03.22 12:35, Piotr Chmura wrote: >>> W dniu 30.03.2022 o 11:55, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: >>>> On 29.03.22 21:21, Robert Schlabbach wrote: >>>>> the patch linked in the bugzilla ticket: >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> should indeed fix the issue. >>>> Ahh, the comment mentioning it was added shortly after I sent my mail. >>>> #regzbot monitor: >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Adding Piotr, the patches' author to the CC, who also replied. >>>> >>>> BTW: that patch is afaics missing a Fixes tag specifying the culprit >>>> and >>>> a `Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17.x` tag to make sure it's quickly >>>> backported to the stable tree, as among others explained here: >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst >>>> >>>> >>> Sorry for my inconvenience. >> Don't worry, everything fine. In a case like... >> >>> I just fixed my device and wanted to share >>> solution with the "world". I'm not familiar with all kernel development >>> convention (yet). >> ...this someone else should point such details out to the submitter >> and/or add these tags when applying the patch. >> >> @Robert: Do you know which commit causes this regression and could tell >> us for a proper Fixes: tag? > Fixes: 1c35ba3bf97213538b82067acc0f23f18e652226 Just FYI, proper fixes tag usage is described here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html Hence in this case it should look like this: Fixes: 1c35ba3bf972 ("media: si2157: use a different namespace for firmware") At this point it likely would be good to submit a v2 of the patch with that Fixes tag, the Tested-by tag from Robert, the CC for stable backports, and Link: tags linking to all known reports about this problem (also described in above document), e.g. like this: Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f660108-8812-383c-83e4-29ee0558d623@leemhuis.info/ Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. #regzbot introduced: 1c35ba3bf972 > Cheers, > Piotr Chmura >> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) >> >> P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of >> reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack >> knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately >> will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope >> that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me >> in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record >> straight. >> >> >>>>> The error was that the rom_id and required >>>>> fields were swapped in the table, so the non-zero rom_id was taken >>>>> as a >>>>> "true" required boolean value, thus incorrectly evaluating that the >>>>> chip requires a firmware file to operate when in fact it does not. >>>>> I have tested the patch and found it worked for me. But I do not know >>>>> how to push this further along: >>>>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/6f84b7f4-3ede-ae55-e99b-a9d4108c80e2@gmail.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Mauro, what's up here? The patch fixes a regression and thus afaics >>>> should quickly find its way towards mainline to get it into the stable >>>> tree, as explained in the (bran new) document linked above. >>>> >>>> Ciao, Thorsten >>>> >>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. März 2022 um 10:33 Uhr >>>>> Von: "Thorsten Leemhuis" <regressions@leemhuis.info> >>>>> An: "Antti Palosaari" <crope@iki.fi>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" >>>>> <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>, "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net> >>>>> Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, >>>>> az0123456@gmx.de, "Linux Media Mailing List" >>>>> <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" >>>>> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> >>>>> Betreff: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware >>>>> file >>>>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >>>>> >>>>> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics >>>>> nobody >>>>> acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I >>>>> decided >>>>> to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant >>>>> here. To quote from >>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : >>>>> >>>>>> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in >>>>>> linux 5.17: >>>>>> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' >>>>>> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware >>>>>> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately >>>>>> the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. >>>>> Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere >>>>> else already? Or even fixed? >>>>> >>>>> >>> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file 2022-03-29 8:33 Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-29 19:21 ` Robert Schlabbach @ 2022-03-29 21:33 ` Piotr Chmura 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Piotr Chmura @ 2022-03-29 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Antti Palosaari, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Robert Schlabbach Cc: regressions, az0123456, Linux Media Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List It's supposed to be fixed by: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/trinity-6009a608-b0ff-4e1a-9b91-ba4a97f10324-1648057812747@3c-app-gmx-bs71/T/#t Test it please. Best regards, Piotr Chmura W dniu 29.03.2022 o 10:33, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. > > I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics nobody > acted upon since it was reported about a week ago, that's why I decided > to forward it to the lists and all people that seemed to be relevant > here. To quote from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 : > >> I get the following error messages when trying to use si2157.ko in linux 5.17: >> si2157 13-0060: found a 'Silicon Labs Si2157-A30 ROM 0x50' >> si2157 13-0060: Can't continue without a firmware >> I did work in linux 5.16.16 without a firmware file. Unfortunately the driver does not tell me the name of the missing firmware file. > Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere > else already? Or even fixed? > > Anyway, to get this tracked: > > #regzbot introduced: v5.16..v5.17 > #regzbot from: az0123456@gmx.de <az0123456@gmx.de> > #regzbot title: media: si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file > #regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of > reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack > knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately > will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope > that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me > in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record > straight. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-31 6:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-03-29 8:33 Bug 215726 - si2157.c: mention name of the missing firmware file Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-29 19:21 ` Robert Schlabbach 2022-03-30 9:55 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-30 10:35 ` Piotr Chmura 2022-03-30 10:44 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-30 15:47 ` Piotr Chmura 2022-03-31 6:46 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-03-29 21:33 ` Piotr Chmura
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.