* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
@ 2021-02-01 10:59 Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 11:07 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello everyone,
the mx6sabresd is broken since 1ca12f034e ("configs: mx6sabresd: Add SPL
FIT and DM support"), it hangs in SPL when booting from SD card, can you
please take a look and fix it? I don't have the board myself, I just
helped bisect it remotely just now.
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 10:59 MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04 Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 11:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 11:28 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:59 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> the mx6sabresd is broken since 1ca12f034e ("configs: mx6sabresd: Add SPL
> FIT and DM support"), it hangs in SPL when booting from SD card, can you
> please take a look and fix it? I don't have the board myself, I just
> helped bisect it remotely just now.
The mx6sabresd boots fine on 2021.01. Could you please give it a try?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 11:07 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 11:28 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 11:37 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 12:07 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:59 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> the mx6sabresd is broken since 1ca12f034e ("configs: mx6sabresd: Add SPL
>> FIT and DM support"), it hangs in SPL when booting from SD card, can you
>> please take a look and fix it? I don't have the board myself, I just
>> helped bisect it remotely just now.
>
> The mx6sabresd boots fine on 2021.01. Could you please give it a try?
Did you test that yourself? I am CCing Christoph, as I don't have the
board. The report I am getting is that it does not boot fine on his end
when writing u-boot-with-spl.imx to SD card at offset 1024B.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 11:28 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 11:37 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 11:58 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:28 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> Did you test that yourself? I am CCing Christoph, as I don't have the
Yes, I tested it myself:
U-Boot SPL 2021.01 (Jan 23 2021 - 14:34:35 -0300)
Trying to boot from MMC1
U-Boot 2021.01 (Jan 23 2021 - 14:34:35 -0300)
CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.2 996 MHz (running at 792 MHz)
CPU: Automotive temperature grade (-40C to 125C) at 43C
Reset cause: POR
Model: Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device Board
I2C: ready
DRAM: 1 GiB
PMIC: PFUZE100 ID=0x10
MMC: FSL_SDHC: 0, FSL_SDHC: 1, FSL_SDHC: 3
Loading Environment from MMC... OK
No panel detected: default to Hannstar-XGA
Display: Hannstar-XGA (1024x768)
In: serial
Out: serial
Err: serial
Net: eth0: ethernet at 2188000
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
> board. The report I am getting is that it does not boot fine on his end
> when writing u-boot-with-spl.imx to SD card at offset 1024B.
I have flashed the SD card by writing SPL at offset 1kB and
u-boot-dtb.img at 69kB.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 11:37 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 11:58 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 12:13 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 12:37 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hello Fabio,
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:28 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> Did you test that yourself? I am CCing Christoph, as I don't have the
>
> Yes, I tested it myself:
>
> U-Boot SPL 2021.01 (Jan 23 2021 - 14:34:35 -0300)
> Trying to boot from MMC1
>
>
> U-Boot 2021.01 (Jan 23 2021 - 14:34:35 -0300)
>
> CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.2 996 MHz (running at 792 MHz)
> CPU: Automotive temperature grade (-40C to 125C) at 43C
> Reset cause: POR
> Model: Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device Board
> I2C: ready
> DRAM: 1 GiB
> PMIC: PFUZE100 ID=0x10
> MMC: FSL_SDHC: 0, FSL_SDHC: 1, FSL_SDHC: 3
> Loading Environment from MMC... OK
> No panel detected: default to Hannstar-XGA
> Display: Hannstar-XGA (1024x768)
> In: serial
> Out: serial
> Err: serial
> Net: eth0: ethernet at 2188000
> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
>
>> board. The report I am getting is that it does not boot fine on his end
>> when writing u-boot-with-spl.imx to SD card at offset 1024B.
>
> I have flashed the SD card by writing SPL at offset 1kB and
> u-boot-dtb.img at 69kB.
Then I have to wonder, does it also work if you write
u-boot-with-spl.imx to the SD card ? If not, then that might be the
problem .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 11:58 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 12:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 12:17 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:58 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> Then I have to wonder, does it also work if you write
> u-boot-with-spl.imx to the SD card ? If not, then that might be the
> problem .
Yes, this is the problem. When flashing u-boot-with-spl.imx:
U-Boot SPL 2021.01 (Feb 01 2021 - 09:10:08 -0300)
Trying to boot from MMC1
mmc_load_image_raw_sector: mmc block read error
SPL: failed to boot from all boot devices
### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 12:13 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 12:17 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 12:22 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 1:13 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:58 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> Then I have to wonder, does it also work if you write
>> u-boot-with-spl.imx to the SD card ? If not, then that might be the
>> problem .
>
> Yes, this is the problem. When flashing u-boot-with-spl.imx:
>
> U-Boot SPL 2021.01 (Feb 01 2021 - 09:10:08 -0300)
> Trying to boot from MMC1
> mmc_load_image_raw_sector: mmc block read error
> SPL: failed to boot from all boot devices
> ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
All right, now we are aligned, good. But that ^ should work, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 12:17 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 12:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 13:01 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:17 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> All right, now we are aligned, good. But that ^ should work, right?
Yes, good that we narrowed it down to the u-boot-with-spl.imx format.
Personally, I haven't used the u-boot-with-spl.imx format before, so I
didn't notice it is broken (at least for mx6sabresd).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 12:22 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 13:01 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 13:09 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 1:22 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:17 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> All right, now we are aligned, good. But that ^ should work, right?
>
> Yes, good that we narrowed it down to the u-boot-with-spl.imx format.
>
> Personally, I haven't used the u-boot-with-spl.imx format before, so I
> didn't notice it is broken (at least for mx6sabresd).
Per arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile , u-boot-with-spl.imx is a concatenation
of SPL and u-boot.uim, which is different than u-boot-dtb.img . The .uim
is plain uImage, the .img is fitImage . I suspect that's where the
problem stems from.
I think
u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.uim FORCE
should really be
u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.img FORCE
under certain (which ?) conditions.
Can you take a look into that ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 13:01 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 13:09 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 13:20 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:01 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> I think
> u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.uim FORCE
> should really be
> u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.img FORCE
> under certain (which ?) conditions.
>
> Can you take a look into that ?
I tried your suggestion and it boots now:
U-Boot SPL 2021.01-dirty (Feb 01 2021 - 10:07:21 -0300)
Trying to boot from MMC1
U-Boot 2021.01-dirty (Feb 01 2021 - 10:07:21 -0300)
CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.2 996 MHz (running at 792 MHz)
CPU: Automotive temperature grade (-40C to 125C) at 50C
Reset cause: POR
Model: Freescale i.MX6 Quad SABRE Smart Device Board
I2C: ready
DRAM: 1 GiB
PMIC: PFUZE100 ID=0x10
MMC: FSL_SDHC: 0, FSL_SDHC: 1, FSL_SDHC: 3
Loading Environment from MMC... *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
No panel detected: default to Hannstar-XGA
Display: Hannstar-XGA (1024x768)
In: serial
Out: serial
Err: serial
Net: eth0: ethernet at 2188000
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 13:09 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 13:20 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 13:30 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 2:09 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:01 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> I think
>> u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.uim FORCE
>> should really be
>> u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.img FORCE
>> under certain (which ?) conditions.
>>
>> Can you take a look into that ?
>
> I tried your suggestion and it boots now:
>
> U-Boot SPL 2021.01-dirty (Feb 01 2021 - 10:07:21 -0300)
> Trying to boot from MMC1
>
>
> U-Boot 2021.01-dirty (Feb 01 2021 - 10:07:21 -0300)
But, it also likely breaks other boards, which still use plain uImage
instead of fitImage. So there needs to be some conditional in the Makefile.
Something like this maybe ?
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile
index 1aa26a50ad..e6b4654cd3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile
@@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ append = cat $(filter-out $< $(PHONY), $^) >> $@
quiet_cmd_pad_cat = CAT $@
cmd_pad_cat = $(cmd_objcopy) && $(append) || rm -f $@
-u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL u-boot.uim FORCE
+u-boot-with-spl.imx: SPL $(if
$(CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE),u-boot.img,u-boot.uim) FORCE
$(call if_changed,pad_cat)
-u-boot-with-nand-spl.imx: spl/u-boot-nand-spl.imx u-boot.uim FORCE
+u-boot-with-nand-spl.imx: spl/u-boot-nand-spl.imx $(if
$(CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE),u-boot.img,u-boot.uim) FORCE
$(call if_changed,pad_cat)
quiet_cmd_u-boot-nand-spl_imx = GEN $@
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 13:20 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 13:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 15:01 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> But, it also likely breaks other boards, which still use plain uImage
> instead of fitImage. So there needs to be some conditional in the Makefile.
>
> Something like this maybe ?
It makes mx6sabresd to boot:
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 13:30 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 15:01 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 16:29 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 2:30 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> But, it also likely breaks other boards, which still use plain uImage
>> instead of fitImage. So there needs to be some conditional in the Makefile.
>>
>> Something like this maybe ?
>
> It makes mx6sabresd to boot:
>
> Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
I posted a patch, you are on CC, thanks.
Can you please add this u-boot-with-spl.imx into the NXP test matrix ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 15:01 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 16:29 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 16:36 ` Marek Vasut
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:01 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> I posted a patch, you are on CC, thanks.
>
> Can you please add this u-boot-with-spl.imx into the NXP test matrix ?
I am not aware of any NXP boot farm tests being done in U-Boot. Maybe
Peng can comment.
I know Heiko tests wandboard on his boot infrastructure. Maybe he
could add u-boot-with-spl.imx there?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 16:29 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-01 16:36 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 17:40 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2021-02-01 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 2/1/21 5:29 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:01 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> I posted a patch, you are on CC, thanks.
>>
>> Can you please add this u-boot-with-spl.imx into the NXP test matrix ?
>
> I am not aware of any NXP boot farm tests being done in U-Boot. Maybe
> Peng can comment.
>
> I know Heiko tests wandboard on his boot infrastructure. Maybe he
> could add u-boot-with-spl.imx there?
I don't think WB uses OF_SEPARATE with fitImages, so maybe there its not
applicable at all ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 16:36 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2021-02-01 17:40 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-02 14:07 ` Heiko Schocher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-01 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:36 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> I don't think WB uses OF_SEPARATE with fitImages, so maybe there its not
> applicable at all ?
Wandboard does use OF_SEPARATE and FIT.
I have just tested flashing u-boot-with-spl.imx into a SD card and
booting a wandboard.
It does behave the same as mx6sabresd:
- Fails to boot without your patch
- Boots fine with your patch
So, yes, wandboard can be used to test u-boot-with-spl.imx and avoid
future regressions in Heiko's boot farm.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-01 17:40 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-02 14:07 ` Heiko Schocher
2021-02-02 14:12 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Schocher @ 2021-02-02 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello Fabio,
Am 01.02.21 um 18:40 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:36 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> I don't think WB uses OF_SEPARATE with fitImages, so maybe there its not
>> applicable at all ?
>
> Wandboard does use OF_SEPARATE and FIT.
>
> I have just tested flashing u-boot-with-spl.imx into a SD card and
> booting a wandboard.
>
> It does behave the same as mx6sabresd:
>
> - Fails to boot without your patch
> - Boots fine with your patch
>
> So, yes, wandboard can be used to test u-boot-with-spl.imx and avoid
> future regressions in Heiko's boot farm.
Last build from this morning:
http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/777
You find log here:
http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/files/results/777/tbot.log
I use currently SPL and u-boot.img ... seems I have to switch
to above image ... currently I have a lot of load on my desk,
so may this takes some time ... sorry
bye,
Heiko
[1] extract part "update SPL and u-boot.img on wandboard" from logfile:
? ? ??[wandboard-uboot] run load_spl
? ? ? ## ethernet at 2188000 Waiting for PHY auto negotiation to complete.... done
? ? ? ## Using ethernet at 2188000 device
? ? ? ## TFTP from server 192.168.3.1; our IP address is 192.168.3.21
? ? ? ## Filename 'wandboard/tbot/SPL'.
? ? ? ## Load address: 0x12000000
? ? ? ## Loading: *\b####
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## 1.6 MiB/s
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## done
? ? ? ## Bytes transferred = 48128 (bc00 hex)
? ? ? ##
? ? ??[wandboard-uboot] run upd_spl
? ? ? ## switch to partitions #0, OK
? ? ? ## mmc0 is current device
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## MMC write: dev # 0, block # 2, count 95 ... 95 blocks written: OK
? ? ??[wandboard-uboot] run cmp_spl
? ? ? ## Using ethernet at 2188000 device
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## TFTP from server 192.168.3.1; our IP address is 192.168.3.21
? ? ? ## Filename 'wandboard/tbot/SPL'.
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## Load address: 0x12000000
? ? ? ## Loading: *\b####
? ? ? ## 2.9 MiB/s
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## done
? ? ? ## Bytes transferred = 48128 (bc00 hex)
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## MMC read: dev # 0, block # 2, count 95 ... 95 blocks read: OK
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## Total of 48128 byte(s) were the same
? ? ? ##
? ? ??[wandboard-uboot] run load_ub
? ? ? ## Using ethernet at 2188000 device
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## TFTP from server 192.168.3.1; our IP address is 192.168.3.21
? ? ? ## Filename 'wandboard/tbot/u-boot.img'.
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## Load address: 0x12000000
? ? ? ## Loading: *\b########################################
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## 2.9 MiB/s
? ? ? ## done
? ? ? ## Bytes transferred = 577444 (8cfa4 hex)
? ? ? ##
? ? ??[wandboard-uboot] run upd_ub
? ? ? ## switch to partitions #0, OK
? ? ? ## mmc0 is current device
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## MMC write: dev # 0, block # 138, count 1128 ... 1128 blocks written: OK
? ? ? ##
? ? ??[wandboard-uboot] run cmp_ub
? ? ? ## Using ethernet at 2188000 device
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## TFTP from server 192.168.3.1; our IP address is 192.168.3.21
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## Filename 'wandboard/tbot/u-boot.img'.
? ? ? ## Load address: 0x12000000
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## Loading: *\b########################################
? ? ? ## 2.5 MiB/s
? ? ? ## done
? ? ? ## Bytes transferred = 577444 (8cfa4 hex)
? ? ? ##
? ? ? ## MMC read: dev # 0, block # 138, count 1128 ... 1128 blocks read: OK
? ? ? ## Total of 577444 byte(s) were the same
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: hs at denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-02 14:07 ` Heiko Schocher
@ 2021-02-02 14:12 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-02 14:22 ` Heiko Schocher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2021-02-02 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Heiko,
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 11:08 AM Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> wrote:
> I use currently SPL and u-boot.img ... seems I have to switch
> to above image ... currently I have a lot of load on my desk,
> so may this takes some time ... sorry
Sure, no problem.
The idea is to keep testing SPL and u-boot.img like you currently do
and add an extra boot test that also tests u-boot-with-spl.imx.
This would allows to catch regressions with the u-boot-with-spl.imx format too.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04
2021-02-02 14:12 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2021-02-02 14:22 ` Heiko Schocher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Schocher @ 2021-02-02 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hello Fabio,
Am 02.02.21 um 15:12 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 11:08 AM Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> wrote:
>
>> I use currently SPL and u-boot.img ... seems I have to switch
>> to above image ... currently I have a lot of load on my desk,
>> so may this takes some time ... sorry
>
> Sure, no problem.
>
> The idea is to keep testing SPL and u-boot.img like you currently do
> and add an extra boot test that also tests u-boot-with-spl.imx.
>
> This would allows to catch regressions with the u-boot-with-spl.imx format too.
Ah, okay, yes this should be doable also ...
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: hs at denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-02 14:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-01 10:59 MX6sabresd broken since v2019.04 Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 11:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 11:28 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 11:37 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 11:58 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 12:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 12:17 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 12:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 13:01 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 13:09 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 13:20 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 13:30 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 15:01 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 16:29 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-01 16:36 ` Marek Vasut
2021-02-01 17:40 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-02 14:07 ` Heiko Schocher
2021-02-02 14:12 ` Fabio Estevam
2021-02-02 14:22 ` Heiko Schocher
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.