All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] libx86: Introduce x86_cpuid_lookup_vendor()
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:39:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5C9A39B00200007800221F23@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a504ce9-9cad-f2a3-4ed5-bd42b114ee06@suse.com>

>>> On 26.03.19 at 15:23, <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> IMO especially in the CPUID case it is desirable to explicitly specify
> the width of the data. Looking at nodes 0x80000002 and following this
> should be rather clear (and I even think get_model_name() should be
> modified to use a pointer to uint32_t instead of unsigned int). Using
> a type with size >= 4 doesn't fit really well. You want size == 4.

Why? Fixed width types only introduce unnecessary restrictions
when wanting to re-use code in other environments. And I don't
see why CPUID nodes 0x8000000[234] would be any better (or
worse) as an example here. If anything they tell us that neither
uint32_t nor unsigned int are right, and it should be char[4] or
uint8_t[4] instead (depending on whether we want to tie
ourselves to CHAR_BIT == 8, which clearly is more restrictive
than sizeof(int) >= 4, but otoh is also less likely to get in the
way).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-26 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 12:21 [PATCH 0/4] x86/cpuid: Handling of synthetic cpuid_policy fields Andrew Cooper
2019-03-21 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] libx86: Introduce x86_cpuid_lookup_vendor() Andrew Cooper
2019-03-26 11:52   ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-26 13:11     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-26 14:07       ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-26 14:23         ` Juergen Gross
2019-03-26 14:39           ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-03-27 15:10             ` Andrew Cooper
     [not found]           ` <5C9A39B00200007800221F23@suse.com>
2019-03-26 14:47             ` Juergen Gross
2019-03-26 15:23               ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-21 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/cpuid: Drop get_cpu_vendor() completely Andrew Cooper
2019-03-26 12:08   ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-26 16:41     ` Andrew Cooper
2019-03-21 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] tools/libxc: Use x86_cpuid_lookup_vendor() rather than opencoding the logic Andrew Cooper
2019-03-26 12:09   ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-21 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] libx86: Recalculate synthesised cpuid_policy fields when appropriate Andrew Cooper
2019-03-26 12:20   ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-26 12:34     ` Andrew Cooper
     [not found] <1553170866*23812*1*git*send*email*andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
     [not found] ` <1553170866*23812*2*git*send*email*andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
     [not found]   ` <5C9A12690200007800221E05@prv1*mh.provo.novell.com>
     [not found]     ` <c5d1df3d*038d*8c0a*97da*a71f8f3fd009@citrix.com>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5C9A39B00200007800221F23@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.