From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, tee-dev@lists.linaro.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 04:02:18 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CE51E2A020000780023144D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <55b6761c-152a-a6fa-085d-5f78443831d1@arm.com> >>> On 22.05.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote: > > On 22/05/2019 09:45, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 21.05.19 at 23:25, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com> wrote: >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 +++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 18 ++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/vsmc.c | 5 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 7 +++ >>> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 + >>> xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 3 + >>> 12 files changed, 253 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c >>> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h >> >> I don't think I'm asking this for the first time: Why am I being Cc-ed >> here? It's all Arm code that gets changed, and the MAINTAINERS >> addition alone imo doesn't warrant widening the Cc list. > > A lot of users uses the scripts/{add, get}_maintainers.pl to get the list of > > maintainers to CCed. Both of them output "THE REST" because of the file > MAINTAINERS is modified. > > I don't think it is sensible to expect users to know when to strip the > list... Hmm, well, I see your point, but I think applying some common sense still can be expected. It's also not sensible for unrelated people to get Cc-ed. I think anyone knowing enough to modify MAINTAINERS can be expected to know whom to Cc. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, tee-dev@lists.linaro.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 04:02:18 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CE51E2A020000780023144D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190522100218.Lvuiesk84YDiFFKy5XIfDogipeVPHF6TIFa4ZkN6G9w@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <55b6761c-152a-a6fa-085d-5f78443831d1@arm.com> >>> On 22.05.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote: > > On 22/05/2019 09:45, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 21.05.19 at 23:25, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com> wrote: >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 +++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 18 ++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/vsmc.c | 5 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 7 +++ >>> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 + >>> xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 3 + >>> 12 files changed, 253 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c >>> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h >> >> I don't think I'm asking this for the first time: Why am I being Cc-ed >> here? It's all Arm code that gets changed, and the MAINTAINERS >> addition alone imo doesn't warrant widening the Cc list. > > A lot of users uses the scripts/{add, get}_maintainers.pl to get the list of > > maintainers to CCed. Both of them output "THE REST" because of the file > MAINTAINERS is modified. > > I don't think it is sensible to expect users to know when to strip the > list... Hmm, well, I see your point, but I think applying some common sense still can be expected. It's also not sensible for unrelated people to get Cc-ed. I think anyone knowing enough to modify MAINTAINERS can be expected to know whom to Cc. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 10:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-21 21:25 [PATCH v5 00/10] TEE mediator (and OP-TEE) support in XEN Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-22 8:45 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 8:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 9:27 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-22 9:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-22 10:02 ` Jan Beulich [this message] 2019-05-22 10:02 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 12:04 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-22 12:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:46 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:48 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-06 16:02 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-07 9:36 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-11 18:18 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-11 18:26 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] xen/arm: optee: add OP-TEE header files Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 11:49 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-10 18:20 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-10 18:53 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] xen/arm: optee: add OP-TEE mediator skeleton Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:34 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] xen/arm: optee: add fast calls handling Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:34 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] xen/arm: optee: add std call handling Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:34 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] xen/arm: optee: add support for RPC SHM buffers Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:33 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] xen/arm: optee: add support for arbitrary shared memory Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:29 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] xen/arm: optee: add support for RPC commands Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:33 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] tools/arm: tee: add "tee" option for xl.cfg Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:44 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-03 14:47 ` Ian Jackson 2019-06-03 14:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] tools/arm: optee: create optee firmware node in DT if tee=optee Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 14:50 ` Ian Jackson 2019-06-03 14:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-06-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] TEE mediator (and OP-TEE) support in XEN Julien Grall 2019-06-01 14:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-01 16:07 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-01 16:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-01 16:55 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-01 16:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-04 13:31 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-06 15:33 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5CE51E2A020000780023144D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \ --to=jbeulich@suse.com \ --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \ --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \ --cc=tee-dev@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=tim@xen.org \ --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \ --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.