All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:22:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c91e8f2-7bdf-4c4a-1da3-08dac79fd9a4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-14-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

Patch looks good, nitpicks below.

On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
>
> Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> implement the old ioport interface, for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  hw/serial.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> index b0465d99..2907089c 100644
> --- a/hw/serial.c
> +++ b/hw/serial.c
> @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
>  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> -			   void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
> -	char *addr = data;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_TX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dll = data;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Loopback mode */
>  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
>  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
>  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
>  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
>  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
>  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
>  		else
> -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dlm = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_FCR:
> -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->fcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->lcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->mcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
>  		/* Factory test */
> @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		/* Not used */
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->scr = data;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -336,46 +331,43 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_RX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> +			*data = dev->dll;
>  		else
>  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> +			*data = dev->dlm;
>  		else
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> +			*data = dev->ier;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IIR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> +		*data = dev->lcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> +		*data = dev->mcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> +		*data = dev->lsr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> +		*data = dev->msr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> +		*data = dev->scr;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -389,6 +381,47 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +	if (is_write) {
> +		 value = *data;

Extra space before value.

> +
> +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, value);
> +	} else {
> +		if (serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, &value))
> +			*data = value;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, true, dev);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, false, dev);
> +
> +	ioport__write8(data, value);

This is correct, but confusing. You pass the address of a local variable as *data
to serial8250_mmio, serial8250_mmio conditionally updates the value at data (which
is &value from here), and then here we update the *data unconditionally. Why not
pass data directly to serial8250_mmio and skip the local variable? Am I missing
something?

Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>  
>  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> @@ -427,8 +460,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
>  };
>  
>  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:22:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c91e8f2-7bdf-4c4a-1da3-08dac79fd9a4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-14-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

Patch looks good, nitpicks below.

On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
>
> Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> implement the old ioport interface, for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  hw/serial.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> index b0465d99..2907089c 100644
> --- a/hw/serial.c
> +++ b/hw/serial.c
> @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
>  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> -			   void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
> -	char *addr = data;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_TX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dll = data;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Loopback mode */
>  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
>  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
>  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
>  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
>  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
>  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
>  		else
> -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dlm = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_FCR:
> -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->fcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->lcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->mcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
>  		/* Factory test */
> @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		/* Not used */
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->scr = data;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -336,46 +331,43 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_RX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> +			*data = dev->dll;
>  		else
>  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> +			*data = dev->dlm;
>  		else
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> +			*data = dev->ier;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IIR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> +		*data = dev->lcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> +		*data = dev->mcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> +		*data = dev->lsr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> +		*data = dev->msr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> +		*data = dev->scr;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -389,6 +381,47 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +	if (is_write) {
> +		 value = *data;

Extra space before value.

> +
> +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, value);
> +	} else {
> +		if (serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, &value))
> +			*data = value;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, true, dev);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, false, dev);
> +
> +	ioport__write8(data, value);

This is correct, but confusing. You pass the address of a local variable as *data
to serial8250_mmio, serial8250_mmio conditionally updates the value at data (which
is &value from here), and then here we update the *data unconditionally. Why not
pass data directly to serial8250_mmio and skip the local variable? Am I missing
something?

Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>  
>  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> @@ -427,8 +460,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
>  };
>  
>  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:22:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c91e8f2-7bdf-4c4a-1da3-08dac79fd9a4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-14-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

Patch looks good, nitpicks below.

On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
>
> Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> implement the old ioport interface, for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  hw/serial.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> index b0465d99..2907089c 100644
> --- a/hw/serial.c
> +++ b/hw/serial.c
> @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
>  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> -			   void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
> -	char *addr = data;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_TX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dll = data;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Loopback mode */
>  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
>  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
>  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
>  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
>  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
>  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
>  		else
> -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dlm = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_FCR:
> -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->fcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->lcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->mcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
>  		/* Factory test */
> @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		/* Not used */
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->scr = data;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -336,46 +331,43 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_RX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> +			*data = dev->dll;
>  		else
>  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> +			*data = dev->dlm;
>  		else
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> +			*data = dev->ier;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IIR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> +		*data = dev->lcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> +		*data = dev->mcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> +		*data = dev->lsr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> +		*data = dev->msr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> +		*data = dev->scr;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -389,6 +381,47 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +	if (is_write) {
> +		 value = *data;

Extra space before value.

> +
> +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, value);
> +	} else {
> +		if (serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, &value))
> +			*data = value;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, true, dev);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +	u8 value = 0;
> +
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, &value, 1, false, dev);
> +
> +	ioport__write8(data, value);

This is correct, but confusing. You pass the address of a local variable as *data
to serial8250_mmio, serial8250_mmio conditionally updates the value at data (which
is &value from here), and then here we update the *data unconditionally. Why not
pass data directly to serial8250_mmio and skip the local variable? Am I missing
something?

Thanks,

Alex

> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>  
>  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> @@ -427,8 +460,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
>  };
>  
>  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-16 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 216+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 14:28 [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-10 17:44     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-10 17:44     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:16     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:16       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:16       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:32       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:32         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:32         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:46         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:46           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:46           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23             ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23             ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:01             ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 15:01               ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 15:01               ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 12:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 12:05     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 12:05     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:45     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:45       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:45       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 14:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 14:05     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 14:05     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:54     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:54       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:54       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:06       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:06         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:06         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/21] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:10   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 16:10     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 16:10     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:43     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 17:43       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 17:43       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 15:50         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 15:50         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 16:55     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 16:55     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:46     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 17:46       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 17:46       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/21] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:23   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:23     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:23     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 10:34     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 10:34       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 10:34       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:17       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:17         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:17         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:48         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:48           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:48           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:03           ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 16:03             ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 16:03             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 10:41   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 10:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 10:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:09     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 12:09       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 12:09       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:19       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 16:19         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 16:19         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/21] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 11:14     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 11:14     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 11:27     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 11:27     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:05     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 14:05       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 14:05       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/21] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:56   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 11:56     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 11:56     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/21] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 12:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 12:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 12:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/21] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 17:50   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 17:50     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-12 17:50     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:22   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-02-16 14:22     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:22     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 14:41       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 14:41       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 17:40       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 17:40         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-22 17:40         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-24 14:54         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-24 14:54           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-24 14:54           ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/21] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:31   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:31     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:31     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:47   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:47     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:47     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 15:51     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 15:51       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 15:51       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/21] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:52   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:52     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 14:52     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 17/21] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 17:03   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 17:03     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-16 17:03     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:13     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:13       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:13       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 18/21] pci: " Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:14     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:14     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:49     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:49     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:34       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:34         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:34         ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 20/21] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:48   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:48     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:48     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:38       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:38         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:38         ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 13:33   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 13:33     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 13:33     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:41       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 16:41       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c91e8f2-7bdf-4c4a-1da3-08dac79fd9a4@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.