Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] util: introduce threaded workqueue

[Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com>]

On 11/24/18 8:12 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 15:20:25 +0800, guangrong.xiao@gmail.com wrote:
>> +   /*
>> +     * the bit in these two bitmaps indicates the index of the ＠requests
> 
> This @ is not ASCII, is it?
> 

Good eyes. :)

Will fix it.

>> +     * respectively. If it's the same, the corresponding request is free
>> +     * and owned by the user, i.e, where the user fills a request. Otherwise,
>> +     * it is valid and owned by the thread, i.e, where the thread fetches
>> +     * the request and write the result.
>> +     */
>> +
>> +    /* after the user fills the request, the bit is flipped. */
>> +    uint64_t request_fill_bitmap QEMU_ALIGNED(SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
>> +    /* after handles the request, the thread flips the bit. */
>> +    uint64_t request_done_bitmap QEMU_ALIGNED(SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> 
> Use DECLARE_BITMAP, otherwise you'll get type errors as David
> pointed out.

If we do it, the field becomes a pointer... that complicates the
thing.

Hmm, i am using the same trick applied by kvm module when it handles
vcpu->requests:
static inline bool kvm_test_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
	return test_bit(req & KVM_REQUEST_MASK, (void *)&vcpu->requests);
}

Is it good?