All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Zhang <markz-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
	<gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm-backlight: add subdrivers & Tegra support
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:18:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6871054.sK10m5bePf@percival> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130121074928.GE15508-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>

Hi Thierry,

On Monday 21 January 2013 15:49:28 Thierry Reding wrote:
> Eventually this should all be covered by the CDF, but since that's not
> ready yet we want something ad-hoc to get the hardware supported. As
> such I would like to see this go into some sort of minimalistic, Tegra-
> specific display/panel framework. I'd prefer to keep the pwm-backlight
> driver as simple and generic as possible, that is, a driver for a PWM-
> controlled backlight.
> 
> Another advantage of moving this into a sort of display framework is
> that it may help in defining the requirements for a CDF and that moving
> the code to the CDF should be easier once it is done.
> 
> Last but not least, abstracting away the panel allows other things such
> as physical dimensions and display modes to be properly encapsulated. I
> think that power-on/off timing requirements for panels also belong to
> this set since they are usually specific to a given panel.
> 
> Maybe adding these drivers to tegra-drm for now would be a good option.
> That way the corresponding glue can be added without a need for inter-
> tree dependencies.

IIRC (because that was a while ago already) having a Tegra-only display 
framework is exactly what we wanted to avoid in the first place. This series 
does nothing but leverage the callbacks mechanism that already exists in pwm-
backlight and make it available to DT systems. If we start making a Tegra-
specific solution, then other architectures will have to reinvent the wheel 
again. I really don't think we want to go that way.

These patches only makes slight changes to pwm_bl.c and do not extend its 
capabilities. I agree that a suitable solution will require the CDF, but by 
the meantime, let's go for the practical route instead of repeating the same 
mistakes (i.e. architecture-specific frameworks) again.

There are certainly better ways to do this, but I'm not convinced at all that 
a Tegra-only solution is one of them.

Alex.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	"linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Zhang <markz@nvidia.com>,
	"gnurou@gmail.com" <gnurou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm-backlight: add subdrivers & Tegra support
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:18:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6871054.sK10m5bePf@percival> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130121074928.GE15508@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>

Hi Thierry,

On Monday 21 January 2013 15:49:28 Thierry Reding wrote:
> Eventually this should all be covered by the CDF, but since that's not
> ready yet we want something ad-hoc to get the hardware supported. As
> such I would like to see this go into some sort of minimalistic, Tegra-
> specific display/panel framework. I'd prefer to keep the pwm-backlight
> driver as simple and generic as possible, that is, a driver for a PWM-
> controlled backlight.
> 
> Another advantage of moving this into a sort of display framework is
> that it may help in defining the requirements for a CDF and that moving
> the code to the CDF should be easier once it is done.
> 
> Last but not least, abstracting away the panel allows other things such
> as physical dimensions and display modes to be properly encapsulated. I
> think that power-on/off timing requirements for panels also belong to
> this set since they are usually specific to a given panel.
> 
> Maybe adding these drivers to tegra-drm for now would be a good option.
> That way the corresponding glue can be added without a need for inter-
> tree dependencies.

IIRC (because that was a while ago already) having a Tegra-only display 
framework is exactly what we wanted to avoid in the first place. This series 
does nothing but leverage the callbacks mechanism that already exists in pwm-
backlight and make it available to DT systems. If we start making a Tegra-
specific solution, then other architectures will have to reinvent the wheel 
again. I really don't think we want to go that way.

These patches only makes slight changes to pwm_bl.c and do not extend its 
capabilities. I agree that a suitable solution will require the CDF, but by 
the meantime, let's go for the practical route instead of repeating the same 
mistakes (i.e. architecture-specific frameworks) again.

There are certainly better ways to do this, but I'm not convinced at all that 
a Tegra-only solution is one of them.

Alex.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Zhang <markz-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
	<gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm-backlight: add subdrivers & Tegra support
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:18:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6871054.sK10m5bePf@percival> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130121074928.GE15508-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>

Hi Thierry,

On Monday 21 January 2013 15:49:28 Thierry Reding wrote:
> Eventually this should all be covered by the CDF, but since that's not
> ready yet we want something ad-hoc to get the hardware supported. As
> such I would like to see this go into some sort of minimalistic, Tegra-
> specific display/panel framework. I'd prefer to keep the pwm-backlight
> driver as simple and generic as possible, that is, a driver for a PWM-
> controlled backlight.
> 
> Another advantage of moving this into a sort of display framework is
> that it may help in defining the requirements for a CDF and that moving
> the code to the CDF should be easier once it is done.
> 
> Last but not least, abstracting away the panel allows other things such
> as physical dimensions and display modes to be properly encapsulated. I
> think that power-on/off timing requirements for panels also belong to
> this set since they are usually specific to a given panel.
> 
> Maybe adding these drivers to tegra-drm for now would be a good option.
> That way the corresponding glue can be added without a need for inter-
> tree dependencies.

IIRC (because that was a while ago already) having a Tegra-only display 
framework is exactly what we wanted to avoid in the first place. This series 
does nothing but leverage the callbacks mechanism that already exists in pwm-
backlight and make it available to DT systems. If we start making a Tegra-
specific solution, then other architectures will have to reinvent the wheel 
again. I really don't think we want to go that way.

These patches only makes slight changes to pwm_bl.c and do not extend its 
capabilities. I agree that a suitable solution will require the CDF, but by 
the meantime, let's go for the practical route instead of repeating the same 
mistakes (i.e. architecture-specific frameworks) again.

There are certainly better ways to do this, but I'm not convinced at all that 
a Tegra-only solution is one of them.

Alex.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-19 10:30 [PATCH 0/3] pwm-backlight: add subdrivers & Tegra support Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30 ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm-backlight: add subdriver mechanism Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30   ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] tegra: pwm-backlight: add tegra pwm-bl driver Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30   ` Alexandre Courbot
     [not found]   ` <1358591420-7790-3-git-send-email-acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-21  7:35     ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  7:35       ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  7:35       ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  8:24       ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-21  8:24         ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-21  8:35         ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  8:35           ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  8:35           ` Mark Zhang
     [not found]       ` <50FCEFDE.8000705-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-21  8:52         ` Marc Dietrich
2013-01-21  8:52           ` Marc Dietrich
2013-01-21  8:52           ` Marc Dietrich
2013-01-21  8:55           ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  8:55             ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21 17:46     ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-21 17:46       ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-21 17:46       ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]       ` <50FD7EF9.1010205-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-22  3:24         ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-22  3:24           ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-22  3:24           ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-22  7:06           ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-22  7:06             ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-23  9:45             ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-23  9:45               ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-24  6:10               ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-24  6:10                 ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-24  6:10                 ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-22 16:30           ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-22 16:30             ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-22 16:30             ` Stephen Warren
2013-01-23 10:15     ` Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-01-23 10:27       ` Leela Krishna Amudala
2013-01-23 10:15       ` Leela Krishna Amudala
     [not found]       ` <CAL1wa8d2BS3RxdsdUyCqF20ZKe46jUZcfUKitnpP9Lgb9aB5hw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-23 10:29         ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-23 10:29           ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-23 10:29           ` Alex Courbot
     [not found] ` <1358591420-7790-1-git-send-email-acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-19 10:30   ` [PATCH 3/3] tegra: ventana: of: add host1x device to DT Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30     ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-19 10:30     ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-20  3:38   ` [PATCH 0/3] pwm-backlight: add subdrivers & Tegra support Mark Zhang
2013-01-20  3:38     ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-20  3:38     ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-20  5:26     ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-20  5:26       ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-01-20  5:51       ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-20  5:51         ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  2:09   ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  2:09     ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  2:09     ` Mark Zhang
     [not found]     ` <50FCA346.2070608-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-21  2:59       ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  2:59         ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  2:59         ` Mark Zhang
2013-01-21  7:49 ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-21  7:49   ` Thierry Reding
     [not found]   ` <20130121074928.GE15508-RM9K5IK7kjIyiCvfTdI0JKcOhU4Rzj621B7CTYaBSLdn68oJJulU0Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-21  8:18     ` Alex Courbot [this message]
2013-01-21  8:18       ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-21  8:18       ` Alex Courbot
2013-01-22  7:17       ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-22  7:17         ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-22  7:17         ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6871054.sK10m5bePf@percival \
    --to=acourbot-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=markz-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-RM9K5IK7kjKj5M59NBduVrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.