All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
	andi@etezian.org
Cc: kernel@axis.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: Split transfers larger than max size
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:48:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dff003d-c727-e4a3-b5d3-f58beb2b02cb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220927112117.77599-4-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>


On 9/27/22 06:21, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> A couple of drivers call spi_split_transfers_maxsize() from their
> ->prepare_message() callbacks to split transfers which are too big for
> them to handle.  Add support in the core to do this based on
> ->max_transfer_size() to avoid code duplication.


Hello,

I've been testing AT25 functionality in linux 6.1 and I believe this 
patch is breaking the AT25 protocol. It will split a write command up 
such that some of the data is in a different transfer than  the write 
enable and address. According to my understanding of the AT25 spec, that 
doesn't work... Someone correct me if I'm wrong though. Do we need a 
flag to enable/disable this behavior depending on the client perhaps?


Thanks,

Eddie


>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
> ---
>   drivers/spi/spi.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index f41a8c2752b8..44e4352d948b 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -1649,6 +1649,15 @@ static int __spi_pump_transfer_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
>   
>   	trace_spi_message_start(msg);
>   
> +	ret = spi_split_transfers_maxsize(ctlr, msg,
> +					  spi_max_transfer_size(msg->spi),
> +					  GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		msg->status = ret;
> +		spi_finalize_current_message(ctlr);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (ctlr->prepare_message) {
>   		ret = ctlr->prepare_message(ctlr, msg);
>   		if (ret) {

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
	andi@etezian.org
Cc: kernel@axis.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: Split transfers larger than max size
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:48:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dff003d-c727-e4a3-b5d3-f58beb2b02cb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220927112117.77599-4-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>


On 9/27/22 06:21, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> A couple of drivers call spi_split_transfers_maxsize() from their
> ->prepare_message() callbacks to split transfers which are too big for
> them to handle.  Add support in the core to do this based on
> ->max_transfer_size() to avoid code duplication.


Hello,

I've been testing AT25 functionality in linux 6.1 and I believe this 
patch is breaking the AT25 protocol. It will split a write command up 
such that some of the data is in a different transfer than  the write 
enable and address. According to my understanding of the AT25 spec, that 
doesn't work... Someone correct me if I'm wrong though. Do we need a 
flag to enable/disable this behavior depending on the client perhaps?


Thanks,

Eddie


>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
> ---
>   drivers/spi/spi.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index f41a8c2752b8..44e4352d948b 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -1649,6 +1649,15 @@ static int __spi_pump_transfer_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
>   
>   	trace_spi_message_start(msg);
>   
> +	ret = spi_split_transfers_maxsize(ctlr, msg,
> +					  spi_max_transfer_size(msg->spi),
> +					  GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		msg->status = ret;
> +		spi_finalize_current_message(ctlr);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (ctlr->prepare_message) {
>   		ret = ctlr->prepare_message(ctlr, msg);
>   		if (ret) {

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-27 11:21 [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: Fix DMA bugs in (not only) spi-s3c64xx Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: Save current RX and TX DMA devices Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: Fix cache corruption due to DMA/PIO overlap Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-30 11:20   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-09-30 11:20     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-09-30 12:10     ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-30 12:10       ` Robin Murphy
2022-10-03 11:29       ` Vincent Whitchurch
2022-10-03 11:29         ` Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: Split transfers larger than max size Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2023-06-22 19:48   ` Eddie James [this message]
2023-06-22 19:48     ` Eddie James
2023-06-22 21:16     ` Mark Brown
2023-06-22 21:16       ` Mark Brown
2023-06-23 16:45       ` Eddie James
2023-06-23 16:45         ` Eddie James
2023-06-23 17:16         ` Mark Brown
2023-06-23 17:16           ` Mark Brown
2022-09-27 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: s3c64xx: Fix large transfers with DMA Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-27 11:21   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2022-09-28 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: Fix DMA bugs in (not only) spi-s3c64xx Mark Brown
2022-09-28 17:27   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6dff003d-c727-e4a3-b5d3-f58beb2b02cb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=andi@etezian.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@axis.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.