All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com>,
	Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>,
	Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>,
	Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@quicinc.com>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:14:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f44aa9e-ba5e-3c94-501c-32e0b35ade56@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fd884ed-1255-5976-6fcc-7a19ad0eb04e@arm.com>

Good afternoon.

On 5/23/2022 5:17 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 09/05/2022 14:39, Mao Jinlong wrote:
>> Integration test for tpdm can help to generate the data for
>> verification of the topology during TPDM software bring up.
>>
>> Sample:
>> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etf0/enable_sink
>> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/enable_source
>> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test
>> echo 2 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test
>> cat /dev/tmc_etf0 > /data/etf-tpdm0.bin
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>
>
> Please could we stick this under a sub-Kconfig entry, like
> we did for the CTI ?
>
> CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TPMD_INTEGRATION_TEST
This is comment in V5 patch. There is no adverse effects for all tpdms with
integration test enabled. So i removed this config.

"

For the last patchset you mentioned that you were making this
configurable because the CTI intgration tests were also configurable.
The reason that the CTI intergration test registers were done in this
way is that some of the CoreSight components were not guaranteed to
return to a usable state once integration test was disabled.
Thus after use of the integration test, a complete board reset was
recommended. Therefore we ensured that these features would only be
used by those specifically configuring them and who were hopefully
aware of the potentail limitations

If your hardware can reliably enable and disable integration test
without adverse effects, then you may wish to consider making the
integration test a permanent feature of the driver.

Regards

Mike
"


>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 14 +++++
>>   2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> index 70df888ac565..57e38aa7d2bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,59 @@ static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct 
>> tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>       CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>>   }
>>   +/*
>> + * value 1: 64 bits test data
>> + * value 2: 32 bits test data
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t integration_test_store(struct device *dev,
>> +                      struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +                      const char *buf,
>> +                      size_t size)
>> +{
>> +    int i, ret = 0;
>> +    unsigned long val;
>> +    struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>> +
>> +    ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    if (val != 1 && val != 2)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (!drvdata->enable)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (val == 1)
>> +        val = ATBCNTRL_VAL_64;
>> +    else
>> +        val = ATBCNTRL_VAL_32;
>> +    CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>> +    writel_relaxed(0x1, drvdata->base + TPDM_ITCNTRL);
>> +
>> +    for (i = 1; i < INTEGRATION_TEST_CYCLE; i++)
>
> super minor nit : It is a bit un-natural, not to have i = 0;
This should be 0. I will update.
>
> Rest looks fine to me .
>
> Suzuki
>
>
>> +        writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_ITATBCNTRL);
>> +
>> +    writel_relaxed(0, drvdata->base + TPDM_ITCNTRL);
>> +    CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>> +    return size;
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(integration_test);
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *tpdm_attrs[] = {
>> +    &dev_attr_integration_test.attr,
>> +    NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct attribute_group tpdm_attr_grp = {
>> +    .attrs = tpdm_attrs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group *tpdm_attr_grps[] = {
>> +    &tpdm_attr_grp,
>> +    NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct 
>> amba_id *id)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
>> @@ -157,6 +210,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, 
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>>       desc.ops = &tpdm_cs_ops;
>>       desc.pdata = adev->dev.platform_data;
>>       desc.dev = &adev->dev;
>> +    desc.groups = tpdm_attr_grps;
>>       drvdata->csdev = coresight_register(&desc);
>>       if (IS_ERR(drvdata->csdev))
>>           return PTR_ERR(drvdata->csdev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> index f95aaad9c653..4aa880794383 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@
>>   /* Enable bit for DSB subunit */
>>   #define TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA        BIT(0)
>>   +/* TPDM integration test registers */
>> +#define TPDM_ITATBCNTRL        (0xEF0)
>> +#define TPDM_ITCNTRL        (0xF00)
>> +
>> +/* Register value for integration test */
>> +#define ATBCNTRL_VAL_32        0xC00F1409
>> +#define ATBCNTRL_VAL_64        0xC01F1409
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Number of cycles to write value when
>> + * integration test.
>> + */
>> +#define INTEGRATION_TEST_CYCLE    10
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * This enum is for PERIPHIDR0 register of TPDM.
>>    * The fields [6:0] of PERIPHIDR0 are used to determine what
>
> _______________________________________________
> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave@lists.linaro.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com>,
	Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com>,
	Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>,
	Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@quicinc.com>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:14:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f44aa9e-ba5e-3c94-501c-32e0b35ade56@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fd884ed-1255-5976-6fcc-7a19ad0eb04e@arm.com>

Good afternoon.

On 5/23/2022 5:17 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 09/05/2022 14:39, Mao Jinlong wrote:
>> Integration test for tpdm can help to generate the data for
>> verification of the topology during TPDM software bring up.
>>
>> Sample:
>> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etf0/enable_sink
>> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/enable_source
>> echo 1 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test
>> echo 2 > /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tpdm0/integration_test
>> cat /dev/tmc_etf0 > /data/etf-tpdm0.bin
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com>
>
> Please could we stick this under a sub-Kconfig entry, like
> we did for the CTI ?
>
> CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TPMD_INTEGRATION_TEST
This is comment in V5 patch. There is no adverse effects for all tpdms with
integration test enabled. So i removed this config.

"

For the last patchset you mentioned that you were making this
configurable because the CTI intgration tests were also configurable.
The reason that the CTI intergration test registers were done in this
way is that some of the CoreSight components were not guaranteed to
return to a usable state once integration test was disabled.
Thus after use of the integration test, a complete board reset was
recommended. Therefore we ensured that these features would only be
used by those specifically configuring them and who were hopefully
aware of the potentail limitations

If your hardware can reliably enable and disable integration test
without adverse effects, then you may wish to consider making the
integration test a permanent feature of the driver.

Regards

Mike
"


>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 14 +++++
>>   2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> index 70df888ac565..57e38aa7d2bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,59 @@ static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct 
>> tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>       CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>>   }
>>   +/*
>> + * value 1: 64 bits test data
>> + * value 2: 32 bits test data
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t integration_test_store(struct device *dev,
>> +                      struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +                      const char *buf,
>> +                      size_t size)
>> +{
>> +    int i, ret = 0;
>> +    unsigned long val;
>> +    struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>> +
>> +    ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    if (val != 1 && val != 2)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (!drvdata->enable)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (val == 1)
>> +        val = ATBCNTRL_VAL_64;
>> +    else
>> +        val = ATBCNTRL_VAL_32;
>> +    CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>> +    writel_relaxed(0x1, drvdata->base + TPDM_ITCNTRL);
>> +
>> +    for (i = 1; i < INTEGRATION_TEST_CYCLE; i++)
>
> super minor nit : It is a bit un-natural, not to have i = 0;
This should be 0. I will update.
>
> Rest looks fine to me .
>
> Suzuki
>
>
>> +        writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_ITATBCNTRL);
>> +
>> +    writel_relaxed(0, drvdata->base + TPDM_ITCNTRL);
>> +    CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>> +    return size;
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(integration_test);
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *tpdm_attrs[] = {
>> +    &dev_attr_integration_test.attr,
>> +    NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct attribute_group tpdm_attr_grp = {
>> +    .attrs = tpdm_attrs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group *tpdm_attr_grps[] = {
>> +    &tpdm_attr_grp,
>> +    NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct 
>> amba_id *id)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
>> @@ -157,6 +210,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, 
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>>       desc.ops = &tpdm_cs_ops;
>>       desc.pdata = adev->dev.platform_data;
>>       desc.dev = &adev->dev;
>> +    desc.groups = tpdm_attr_grps;
>>       drvdata->csdev = coresight_register(&desc);
>>       if (IS_ERR(drvdata->csdev))
>>           return PTR_ERR(drvdata->csdev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> index f95aaad9c653..4aa880794383 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@
>>   /* Enable bit for DSB subunit */
>>   #define TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA        BIT(0)
>>   +/* TPDM integration test registers */
>> +#define TPDM_ITATBCNTRL        (0xEF0)
>> +#define TPDM_ITCNTRL        (0xF00)
>> +
>> +/* Register value for integration test */
>> +#define ATBCNTRL_VAL_32        0xC00F1409
>> +#define ATBCNTRL_VAL_64        0xC01F1409
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Number of cycles to write value when
>> + * integration test.
>> + */
>> +#define INTEGRATION_TEST_CYCLE    10
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * This enum is for PERIPHIDR0 register of TPDM.
>>    * The fields [6:0] of PERIPHIDR0 are used to determine what
>
> _______________________________________________
> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave@lists.linaro.org

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09 13:39 [PATCH v7 00/10] Coresight: Add support for TPDM and TPDA Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39 ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] coresight: core: Use IDR for non-cpu bound sources' paths Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] Coresight: Add coresight TPDM source driver Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-23  8:57   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  8:57     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-24  7:00     ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-24  7:00       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-06-01  9:21       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-06-01  9:21         ` Jinlong Mao
2022-06-01  9:30         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-06-01  9:30           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-06-01  9:56           ` Jinlong Mao
2022-06-01  9:56             ` Jinlong Mao
2022-06-02  3:14             ` Jinlong Mao
2022-06-02  3:14               ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDM hardware definitions Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-23  9:02   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:02     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] coresight-tpdm: Add DSB dataset support Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-23  9:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:11     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:24     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:24       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-24  7:15       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-24  7:15         ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-24  7:07     ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-24  7:07       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] coresight-tpdm: Add integration test support Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-23  9:17   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:17     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-24  7:14     ` Jinlong Mao [this message]
2022-05-24  7:14       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] docs: sysfs: coresight: Add sysfs ABI documentation for TPDM Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] Coresight: Add TPDA link driver Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-23  9:40   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:40     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-24  7:32     ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-24  7:32       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] dt-bindings: arm: Adds CoreSight TPDA hardware definitions Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-23  9:44   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23  9:44     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-05-23 14:24     ` Rob Herring
2022-05-23 14:24       ` Rob Herring
2022-05-24  7:34       ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-24  7:34         ` Jinlong Mao
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add coresight components Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add tpdm mm/prng Mao Jinlong
2022-05-09 13:39   ` Mao Jinlong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f44aa9e-ba5e-3c94-501c-32e0b35ade56@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_hazha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_taozha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_yuanfang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.