All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Vivek Gautam
	<vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	jcrouse-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org,
	robdclark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	tfiga-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	freedreno-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:42:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <763bc179-759a-cfda-e485-cf619ab5faec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830144541.17740-3-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>

On 30/08/18 15:45, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.

To the best of my knowledge in this stuff (which is still not quite 
enough to be *truly* confident...),

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index d900e007c3c9..1bf542010be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,20 @@ static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
>   	{ 0, NULL},
>   };
>   
> +static inline int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		return pm_runtime_get_sync(smmu->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_put(smmu->dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct arm_smmu_domain *to_smmu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
>   {
>   	return container_of(dom, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
> @@ -913,11 +927,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> -	int irq;
> +	int ret, irq;
>   
>   	if (!smmu || domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY)
>   		return;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Disable the context bank and free the page tables before freeing
>   	 * it.
> @@ -932,6 +950,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   
>   	free_io_pgtable_ops(smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops);
>   	__arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->context_map, cfg->cbndx);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   }
>   
>   static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> @@ -1213,10 +1233,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
> +
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
>   	/* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>   	ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Sanity check the domain. We don't support domains across
> @@ -1226,33 +1251,50 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		dev_err(dev,
>   			"cannot attach to SMMU %s whilst already attached to domain on SMMU %s\n",
>   			dev_name(smmu_domain->smmu->dev), dev_name(smmu->dev));
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
> -	return arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +
> +rpm_put:
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
> -	return ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			     size_t size)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	size_t ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	return ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> @@ -1407,7 +1449,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>   	while (i--)
>   		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_cfg_free;
> +
>   	ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto out_cfg_free;
>   
> @@ -1427,7 +1475,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> -
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
>   		return;
> @@ -1435,8 +1483,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
>   	smmu = cfg->smmu;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
>   	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
>   	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> @@ -2180,6 +2235,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
>   	arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * We want to avoid touching dev->power.lock in fastpaths unless
> +	 * it's really going to do something useful - pm_runtime_enabled()
> +	 * can serve as an ideal proxy for that decision. So, conditionally
> +	 * enable pm_runtime.
> +	 */
> +	if (dev->pm_domain) {
> +		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> +		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * For ACPI and generic DT bindings, an SMMU will be probed before
>   	 * any device which might need it, so we want the bus ops in place
> @@ -2215,10 +2281,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!bitmap_empty(smmu->context_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS))
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
>   
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	/* Turn the thing off */
>   	writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_force_suspend(smmu->dev);
> +	else
> +		clk_bulk_disable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
> -	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
> +	clk_bulk_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 
_______________________________________________
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
	joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, robdclark@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	tfiga@chromium.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org,
	sricharan@codeaurora.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	architt@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:42:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <763bc179-759a-cfda-e485-cf619ab5faec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830144541.17740-3-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On 30/08/18 15:45, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.

To the best of my knowledge in this stuff (which is still not quite 
enough to be *truly* confident...),

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index d900e007c3c9..1bf542010be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,20 @@ static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
>   	{ 0, NULL},
>   };
>   
> +static inline int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		return pm_runtime_get_sync(smmu->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_put(smmu->dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct arm_smmu_domain *to_smmu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
>   {
>   	return container_of(dom, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
> @@ -913,11 +927,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> -	int irq;
> +	int ret, irq;
>   
>   	if (!smmu || domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY)
>   		return;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Disable the context bank and free the page tables before freeing
>   	 * it.
> @@ -932,6 +950,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   
>   	free_io_pgtable_ops(smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops);
>   	__arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->context_map, cfg->cbndx);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   }
>   
>   static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> @@ -1213,10 +1233,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
> +
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
>   	/* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>   	ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Sanity check the domain. We don't support domains across
> @@ -1226,33 +1251,50 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		dev_err(dev,
>   			"cannot attach to SMMU %s whilst already attached to domain on SMMU %s\n",
>   			dev_name(smmu_domain->smmu->dev), dev_name(smmu->dev));
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
> -	return arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +
> +rpm_put:
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
> -	return ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			     size_t size)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	size_t ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	return ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> @@ -1407,7 +1449,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>   	while (i--)
>   		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_cfg_free;
> +
>   	ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto out_cfg_free;
>   
> @@ -1427,7 +1475,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> -
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
>   		return;
> @@ -1435,8 +1483,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
>   	smmu = cfg->smmu;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
>   	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
>   	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> @@ -2180,6 +2235,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
>   	arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * We want to avoid touching dev->power.lock in fastpaths unless
> +	 * it's really going to do something useful - pm_runtime_enabled()
> +	 * can serve as an ideal proxy for that decision. So, conditionally
> +	 * enable pm_runtime.
> +	 */
> +	if (dev->pm_domain) {
> +		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> +		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * For ACPI and generic DT bindings, an SMMU will be probed before
>   	 * any device which might need it, so we want the bus ops in place
> @@ -2215,10 +2281,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!bitmap_empty(smmu->context_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS))
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
>   
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	/* Turn the thing off */
>   	writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_force_suspend(smmu->dev);
> +	else
> +		clk_bulk_disable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
> -	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
> +	clk_bulk_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-30 14:45 [PATCH v16 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45 ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found] ` <20180830144541.17740-1-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-2-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26 15:27       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:27         ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]         ` <1a918f99-83b0-2f51-7634-126639a220de-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-27  8:31           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-27  8:31             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-28 11:59     ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-01  5:49       ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01  5:49         ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]         ` <CAFp+6iHZysBmMZj+pZghPocEwDzU7KfR1gLQAQRBui+-gdiSTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01  9:38           ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-01  9:38             ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found]             ` <CAPDyKFrCWaeDLbmbrRb23V_mRk8doBjM3u2X9tm0XNXm=-n5vA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01 10:21               ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01 10:21                 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01 10:32           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01 10:32             ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]             ` <CAFp+6iFJbQZ1MrNWD6g+GNp9TOMXuq0oDdzQ9XUMTmY67tNgWg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01 12:02               ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-01 12:02                 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-3-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-07  9:16       ` Tomasz Figa
2018-09-07  9:16         ` Tomasz Figa
     [not found]         ` <CAAFQd5B7YR03Jm1upOg2nsaKOb1iDD7-WGo-qx7S8m-nounCvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-07  9:38           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-07  9:38             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-07  9:52             ` Tomasz Figa
2018-09-07  9:52               ` Tomasz Figa
     [not found]               ` <CAAFQd5DMDWEeBU=fg6arye3pXnrCqOA4tDtMSGutXk7vSz-EtQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-07 10:22                 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-07 10:22                   ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                   ` <CAFp+6iE3+qn6-gpXEzxfoP5yPMARmUcJNn0AZk-kA2AreTLnng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-18  3:11                     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-18  3:11                       ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                       ` <CAFp+6iHnHj_PkPFBUSTdJTW57K51wLqSEw6VOMKxAVo7O+ms9g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-25  5:56                         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-25  5:56                           ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                           ` <CAFp+6iFvhdSq7upbvsEWgMewhAaaRM91iw9p7qOFPYrUxis0Hg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-25 18:55                             ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-25 18:55                               ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]                               ` <aedf3f32-68ae-566a-3735-ca4ec5c7559a-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26  6:22                                 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26  6:22                                   ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26 15:42       ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-09-26 15:42         ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-01 12:58       ` Will Deacon
2018-10-01 12:58         ` Will Deacon
     [not found]         ` <20181001125854.GB31488-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-02  4:14           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  4:14             ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]             ` <CAFp+6iGkudBtZFfk4ST+k9OMRSGgU=pzVGC4QaSmPb+Xkdp3Xw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-02  5:28               ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  5:28                 ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                 ` <CAFp+6iFpm05Uu8HkYCC+O+gYwFwvxirc6=e6oOed+ZJk6QLDPw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-02  7:12                   ` [PATCH v17 " Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  7:12                     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  7:12                     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-4-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26 15:44       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:44         ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-5-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-06  3:52       ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-06  3:52         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-10 18:02       ` Rob Herring
2018-09-10 18:02         ` Rob Herring
2018-09-11  8:34         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-11  8:34           ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26 15:46       ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:46         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Robin Murphy
2018-10-01 12:18       ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-10-01 12:18         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-10-01 17:36         ` Rob Herring
     [not found]           ` <CAL_Jsq+dSGXCiWsjLt00wu=s-ZW8M1pkQqKFWboc54M8gHFTYg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01 17:45             ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-10-01 17:45               ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom, smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-6-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26 15:59       ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom, smmu-v2 variant Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:59         ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Robin Murphy
2018-09-27  6:55         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-27  6:55           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-28 13:57   ` [PATCH v16 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Will Deacon
2018-09-28 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2018-10-01  9:06     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01  9:06       ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=763bc179-759a-cfda-e485-cf619ab5faec@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=freedreno-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jcrouse-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robdclark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tfiga-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.