All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Vivek Gautam
	<vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	jcrouse-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org,
	robdclark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	tfiga-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	freedreno-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:42:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <763bc179-759a-cfda-e485-cf619ab5faec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830144541.17740-3-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>

On 30/08/18 15:45, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.

To the best of my knowledge in this stuff (which is still not quite 
enough to be *truly* confident...),

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index d900e007c3c9..1bf542010be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,20 @@ static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
>   	{ 0, NULL},
>   };
>   
> +static inline int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		return pm_runtime_get_sync(smmu->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_put(smmu->dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct arm_smmu_domain *to_smmu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
>   {
>   	return container_of(dom, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
> @@ -913,11 +927,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> -	int irq;
> +	int ret, irq;
>   
>   	if (!smmu || domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY)
>   		return;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Disable the context bank and free the page tables before freeing
>   	 * it.
> @@ -932,6 +950,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   
>   	free_io_pgtable_ops(smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops);
>   	__arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->context_map, cfg->cbndx);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   }
>   
>   static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> @@ -1213,10 +1233,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
> +
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
>   	/* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>   	ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Sanity check the domain. We don't support domains across
> @@ -1226,33 +1251,50 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		dev_err(dev,
>   			"cannot attach to SMMU %s whilst already attached to domain on SMMU %s\n",
>   			dev_name(smmu_domain->smmu->dev), dev_name(smmu->dev));
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
> -	return arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +
> +rpm_put:
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
> -	return ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			     size_t size)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	size_t ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	return ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> @@ -1407,7 +1449,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>   	while (i--)
>   		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_cfg_free;
> +
>   	ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto out_cfg_free;
>   
> @@ -1427,7 +1475,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> -
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
>   		return;
> @@ -1435,8 +1483,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
>   	smmu = cfg->smmu;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
>   	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
>   	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> @@ -2180,6 +2235,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
>   	arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * We want to avoid touching dev->power.lock in fastpaths unless
> +	 * it's really going to do something useful - pm_runtime_enabled()
> +	 * can serve as an ideal proxy for that decision. So, conditionally
> +	 * enable pm_runtime.
> +	 */
> +	if (dev->pm_domain) {
> +		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> +		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * For ACPI and generic DT bindings, an SMMU will be probed before
>   	 * any device which might need it, so we want the bus ops in place
> @@ -2215,10 +2281,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!bitmap_empty(smmu->context_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS))
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
>   
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	/* Turn the thing off */
>   	writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_force_suspend(smmu->dev);
> +	else
> +		clk_bulk_disable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
> -	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
> +	clk_bulk_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 
_______________________________________________
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
	joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, robdclark@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	tfiga@chromium.org, jcrouse@codeaurora.org,
	sricharan@codeaurora.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	architt@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:42:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <763bc179-759a-cfda-e485-cf619ab5faec@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830144541.17740-3-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On 30/08/18 15:45, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> 
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.

To the best of my knowledge in this stuff (which is still not quite 
enough to be *truly* confident...),

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index d900e007c3c9..1bf542010be7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,20 @@ static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
>   	{ 0, NULL},
>   };
>   
> +static inline int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		return pm_runtime_get_sync(smmu->dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_put(smmu->dev);
> +}
> +
>   static struct arm_smmu_domain *to_smmu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
>   {
>   	return container_of(dom, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
> @@ -913,11 +927,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> -	int irq;
> +	int ret, irq;
>   
>   	if (!smmu || domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY)
>   		return;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Disable the context bank and free the page tables before freeing
>   	 * it.
> @@ -932,6 +950,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_destroy_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   
>   	free_io_pgtable_ops(smmu_domain->pgtbl_ops);
>   	__arm_smmu_free_bitmap(smmu->context_map, cfg->cbndx);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>   }
>   
>   static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> @@ -1213,10 +1233,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
> +
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
>   	/* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>   	ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu);
>   	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Sanity check the domain. We don't support domains across
> @@ -1226,33 +1251,50 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>   		dev_err(dev,
>   			"cannot attach to SMMU %s whilst already attached to domain on SMMU %s\n",
>   			dev_name(smmu_domain->smmu->dev), dev_name(smmu->dev));
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto rpm_put;
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
> -	return arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +	ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
> +
> +rpm_put:
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static int arm_smmu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size, int prot)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
> -	return ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->map(ops, iova, paddr, size, prot);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static size_t arm_smmu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
>   			     size_t size)
>   {
>   	struct io_pgtable_ops *ops = to_smmu_domain(domain)->pgtbl_ops;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = to_smmu_domain(domain)->smmu;
> +	size_t ret;
>   
>   	if (!ops)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	return ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	ret = ops->unmap(ops, iova, size);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> @@ -1407,7 +1449,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>   	while (i--)
>   		cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_cfg_free;
> +
>   	ret = arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(dev);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto out_cfg_free;
>   
> @@ -1427,7 +1475,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>   	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> -
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
>   		return;
> @@ -1435,8 +1483,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>   	cfg  = fwspec->iommu_priv;
>   	smmu = cfg->smmu;
>   
> +	ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return;
> +
>   	iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
>   	arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
> +
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
>   	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
>   	kfree(fwspec->iommu_priv);
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> @@ -2180,6 +2235,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
>   	arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * We want to avoid touching dev->power.lock in fastpaths unless
> +	 * it's really going to do something useful - pm_runtime_enabled()
> +	 * can serve as an ideal proxy for that decision. So, conditionally
> +	 * enable pm_runtime.
> +	 */
> +	if (dev->pm_domain) {
> +		pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> +		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * For ACPI and generic DT bindings, an SMMU will be probed before
>   	 * any device which might need it, so we want the bus ops in place
> @@ -2215,10 +2281,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!bitmap_empty(smmu->context_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS))
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
>   
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>   	/* Turn the thing off */
>   	writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> +	arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> +		pm_runtime_force_suspend(smmu->dev);
> +	else
> +		clk_bulk_disable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
> -	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
> +	clk_bulk_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-30 14:45 [PATCH v16 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45 ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found] ` <20180830144541.17740-1-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-2-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26 15:27       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:27         ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]         ` <1a918f99-83b0-2f51-7634-126639a220de-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-27  8:31           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-27  8:31             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-28 11:59     ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-01  5:49       ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01  5:49         ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]         ` <CAFp+6iHZysBmMZj+pZghPocEwDzU7KfR1gLQAQRBui+-gdiSTQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01  9:38           ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-01  9:38             ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found]             ` <CAPDyKFrCWaeDLbmbrRb23V_mRk8doBjM3u2X9tm0XNXm=-n5vA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01 10:21               ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01 10:21                 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01 10:32           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01 10:32             ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]             ` <CAFp+6iFJbQZ1MrNWD6g+GNp9TOMXuq0oDdzQ9XUMTmY67tNgWg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01 12:02               ` Ulf Hansson
2018-10-01 12:02                 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-3-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-07  9:16       ` Tomasz Figa
2018-09-07  9:16         ` Tomasz Figa
     [not found]         ` <CAAFQd5B7YR03Jm1upOg2nsaKOb1iDD7-WGo-qx7S8m-nounCvA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-07  9:38           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-07  9:38             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-07  9:52             ` Tomasz Figa
2018-09-07  9:52               ` Tomasz Figa
     [not found]               ` <CAAFQd5DMDWEeBU=fg6arye3pXnrCqOA4tDtMSGutXk7vSz-EtQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-07 10:22                 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-07 10:22                   ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                   ` <CAFp+6iE3+qn6-gpXEzxfoP5yPMARmUcJNn0AZk-kA2AreTLnng-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-18  3:11                     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-18  3:11                       ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                       ` <CAFp+6iHnHj_PkPFBUSTdJTW57K51wLqSEw6VOMKxAVo7O+ms9g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-25  5:56                         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-25  5:56                           ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                           ` <CAFp+6iFvhdSq7upbvsEWgMewhAaaRM91iw9p7qOFPYrUxis0Hg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-25 18:55                             ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-25 18:55                               ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]                               ` <aedf3f32-68ae-566a-3735-ca4ec5c7559a-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26  6:22                                 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26  6:22                                   ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26 15:42       ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-09-26 15:42         ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-01 12:58       ` Will Deacon
2018-10-01 12:58         ` Will Deacon
     [not found]         ` <20181001125854.GB31488-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-02  4:14           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  4:14             ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]             ` <CAFp+6iGkudBtZFfk4ST+k9OMRSGgU=pzVGC4QaSmPb+Xkdp3Xw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-02  5:28               ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  5:28                 ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]                 ` <CAFp+6iFpm05Uu8HkYCC+O+gYwFwvxirc6=e6oOed+ZJk6QLDPw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-02  7:12                   ` [PATCH v17 " Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  7:12                     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-02  7:12                     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-4-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26 15:44       ` Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:44         ` Robin Murphy
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-5-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-06  3:52       ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-06  3:52         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-10 18:02       ` Rob Herring
2018-09-10 18:02         ` Rob Herring
2018-09-11  8:34         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-11  8:34           ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-09-26 15:46       ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:46         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Robin Murphy
2018-10-01 12:18       ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-10-01 12:18         ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-10-01 17:36         ` Rob Herring
     [not found]           ` <CAL_Jsq+dSGXCiWsjLt00wu=s-ZW8M1pkQqKFWboc54M8gHFTYg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-01 17:45             ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom, smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-10-01 17:45               ` [PATCH v16 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Will Deacon
2018-08-30 14:45   ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom, smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-08-30 14:45     ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
     [not found]     ` <20180830144541.17740-6-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-26 15:59       ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom, smmu-v2 variant Robin Murphy
2018-09-26 15:59         ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Robin Murphy
2018-09-27  6:55         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-27  6:55           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-28 13:57   ` [PATCH v16 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Will Deacon
2018-09-28 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2018-10-01  9:06     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-01  9:06       ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=763bc179-759a-cfda-e485-cf619ab5faec@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=freedreno-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jcrouse-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robdclark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sboyd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tfiga-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.