All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: single copy atomicity for double load/stores on 32-bit systems
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:43:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77b30ed2-3211-222b-1342-051a6cde4f77@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531082112.GH2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 5/31/19 1:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> And I'll stand by my earlier conviction that any architecture that has a
> native u64 (be it a 64bit arch or a 32bit with double-width
> instructions) but has an ABI that allows u32 alignment on them is daft.

Why ? For 64-bit data on 32-bit systems, hardware doesn't claim to provide any
single-copy atomicity for such data and software doesn't expect either.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: single copy atomicity for double load/stores on 32-bit systems
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:43:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77b30ed2-3211-222b-1342-051a6cde4f77@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531082112.GH2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 5/31/19 1:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> And I'll stand by my earlier conviction that any architecture that has a
> native u64 (be it a 64bit arch or a 32bit with double-width
> instructions) but has an ABI that allows u32 alignment on them is daft.

Why ? For 64-bit data on 32-bit systems, hardware doesn't claim to provide any
single-copy atomicity for such data and software doesn't expect either.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-03 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-30 18:22 single copy atomicity for double load/stores on 32-bit systems Vineet Gupta
2019-05-30 18:22 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-30 18:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 18:53   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 19:16   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-30 19:16     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-31  8:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31  8:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31  8:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31  8:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31  8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31  8:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 18:08   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-06-03 18:08     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-06-03 20:13     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 20:13       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 21:59       ` Vineet Gupta
2019-06-03 21:59         ` Vineet Gupta
2019-06-04  7:41       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-04  7:41         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-04  7:41         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06  9:43         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  9:43           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  9:53           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06  9:53             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-06 16:34           ` David Laight
2019-06-06 16:34             ` David Laight
2019-06-06 21:17             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06 21:17               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 18:43   ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2019-06-03 18:43     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-07-01 20:05   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-07-01 20:05     ` Vineet Gupta
2019-07-02 10:46     ` Will Deacon
2019-07-02 10:46       ` Will Deacon
2019-05-31  9:41 ` David Laight
2019-05-31  9:41   ` David Laight
2019-05-31  9:41   ` David Laight
2019-05-31 11:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-31 11:44     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 18:44   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-06-03 18:44     ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77b30ed2-3211-222b-1342-051a6cde4f77@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.