All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] x86 topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package support
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:58:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b23d2d26d717b8e14ba137c94b70943f1ae4b5c.1557769318.git.len.brown@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190513175903.8735-1-lenb@kernel.org>

From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some new systems have multiple software-visible die within each package.

Update Linux parsing of the Intel CPUID "Extended Topology Leaf"
to handle either CPUID.B, or the new CPUID.1F.

Add cpuinfo_x86.die_id and cpuinfo_x86.max_dies to store the result.

die_id will be non-zero only for multi-die/package systems.

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/x86/topology.rst   |  4 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |  4 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c   | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c        |  2 +
 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/topology.rst b/Documentation/x86/topology.rst
index 6e28dbe818ab..8e9704f61017 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/topology.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/topology.rst
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ Package-related topology information in the kernel:
 
     The number of cores in a package. This information is retrieved via CPUID.
 
+  - cpuinfo_x86.x86_max_dies:
+
+    The number of dies in a package. This information is retrieved via CPUID.
+
   - cpuinfo_x86.phys_proc_id:
 
     The physical ID of the package. This information is retrieved via CPUID
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 7e99ef67bff0..00fc03a8da59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	int			x86_power;
 	unsigned long		loops_per_jiffy;
 	/* cpuid returned max cores value: */
-	u16			 x86_max_cores;
+	u16			x86_max_cores;
+	u16			x86_max_dies;
 	u16			apicid;
 	u16			initial_apicid;
 	u16			x86_clflush_size;
@@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	u16			logical_proc_id;
 	/* Core id: */
 	u16			cpu_core_id;
+	u16			cpu_die_id;
 	/* Index into per_cpu list: */
 	u16			cpu_index;
 	u32			microcode;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
index 8f6c784141d1..4d17e699657d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
@@ -15,33 +15,63 @@
 /* leaf 0xb SMT level */
 #define SMT_LEVEL	0
 
-/* leaf 0xb sub-leaf types */
+/* extended topology sub-leaf types */
 #define INVALID_TYPE	0
 #define SMT_TYPE	1
 #define CORE_TYPE	2
+#define DIE_TYPE	5
 
 #define LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx)		(((ecx) >> 8) & 0xff)
 #define BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax)	((eax) & 0x1f)
 #define LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx)		((ebx) & 0xffff)
 
-int detect_extended_topology_early(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * Check if given CPUID extended toplogy "leaf" is implemented
+ */
+static int check_extended_topology_leaf(int leaf)
+{
 	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 
-	if (c->cpuid_level < 0xb)
+	cpuid_count(leaf, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+
+	if (ebx == 0 || (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != SMT_TYPE))
 		return -1;
 
-	cpuid_count(0xb, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	return 0;
+}
+/*
+ * Return best CPUID Extended Toplogy Leaf supported
+ */
+static int detect_extended_topology_leaf(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x1f) {
+		if (check_extended_topology_leaf(0x1f) == 0)
+			return 0x1f;
+	}
 
-	/*
-	 * check if the cpuid leaf 0xb is actually implemented.
-	 */
-	if (ebx == 0 || (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != SMT_TYPE))
+	if (c->cpuid_level >= 0xb) {
+		if (check_extended_topology_leaf(0xb) == 0)
+			return 0xb;
+	}
+
+	return -1;
+}
+#endif
+
+int detect_extended_topology_early(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+	int leaf;
+
+	leaf = detect_extended_topology_leaf(c);
+	if (leaf < 0)
 		return -1;
 
 	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY);
 
+	cpuid_count(leaf, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 	/*
 	 * initial apic id, which also represents 32-bit extended x2apic id.
 	 */
@@ -52,7 +82,7 @@ int detect_extended_topology_early(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 }
 
 /*
- * Check for extended topology enumeration cpuid leaf 0xb and if it
+ * Check for extended topology enumeration cpuid leaf, and if it
  * exists, use it for populating initial_apicid and cpu topology
  * detection.
  */
@@ -60,22 +90,28 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sub_index;
-	unsigned int ht_mask_width, core_plus_mask_width;
+	unsigned int ht_mask_width, core_plus_mask_width, die_plus_mask_width;
 	unsigned int core_select_mask, core_level_siblings;
+	unsigned int die_select_mask, die_level_siblings;
+	int leaf;
 
-	if (detect_extended_topology_early(c) < 0)
+	leaf = detect_extended_topology_leaf(c);
+	if (leaf < 0)
 		return -1;
 
 	/*
 	 * Populate HT related information from sub-leaf level 0.
 	 */
-	cpuid_count(0xb, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	cpuid_count(leaf, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+	c->initial_apicid = edx;
 	core_level_siblings = smp_num_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
 	core_plus_mask_width = ht_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
+	die_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
+	die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
 
 	sub_index = 1;
 	do {
-		cpuid_count(0xb, sub_index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+		cpuid_count(leaf, sub_index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 
 		/*
 		 * Check for the Core type in the implemented sub leaves.
@@ -83,23 +119,34 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		if (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) == CORE_TYPE) {
 			core_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
 			core_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
-			break;
+			die_level_siblings = core_level_siblings;
+			die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
+		}
+		if (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) == DIE_TYPE) {
+			die_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
+			die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
 		}
 
 		sub_index++;
 	} while (LEAFB_SUBTYPE(ecx) != INVALID_TYPE);
 
 	core_select_mask = (~(-1 << core_plus_mask_width)) >> ht_mask_width;
-
-	c->cpu_core_id = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid, ht_mask_width)
-						 & core_select_mask;
-	c->phys_proc_id = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid, core_plus_mask_width);
+	die_select_mask = (~(-1 << die_plus_mask_width)) >>
+				core_plus_mask_width;
+
+	c->cpu_core_id = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid,
+				ht_mask_width) & core_select_mask;
+	c->cpu_die_id = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid,
+				core_plus_mask_width) & die_select_mask;
+	c->phys_proc_id = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid,
+				die_plus_mask_width);
 	/*
 	 * Reinit the apicid, now that we have extended initial_apicid.
 	 */
 	c->apicid = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid, 0);
 
 	c->x86_max_cores = (core_level_siblings / smp_num_siblings);
+	c->x86_max_dies = (die_level_siblings / core_level_siblings);
 #endif
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 73e69aaaa117..40ffe23249c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ static bool match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
 		int cpu1 = c->cpu_index, cpu2 = o->cpu_index;
 
 		if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
+		    c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id &&
 		    per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu2)) {
 			if (c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id)
 				return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
@@ -400,6 +401,7 @@ static bool match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
 		}
 
 	} else if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
+		   c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id &&
 		   c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id) {
 		return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
 	}
-- 
2.18.0-rc0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-13 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-13 17:58 [PATCH 0/19] v6 multi-die/package topology support Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58 ` Len Brown [this message]
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 02/19] x86 topology: Create topology_max_die_per_package() Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:23     ` [tip:x86/topology] x86/topology: " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 03/19] cpu topology: Export die_id Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:24     ` [tip:x86/topology] cpu/topology: " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 04/19] x86 topology: Define topology_die_id() Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:24     ` [tip:x86/topology] x86/topology: " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 05/19] x86 topology: Define topology_logical_die_id() Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:25     ` [tip:x86/topology] x86/topology: " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 06/19] powercap/intel_rapl: Simplify rapl_find_package() Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:26     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Zhang Rui
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 07/19] powercap/intel_rapl: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:26     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Zhang Rui
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 08/19] thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal: " Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:27     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Zhang Rui
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 09/19] powercap/intel_rapl: Update RAPL domain name and debug messages Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:28     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Zhang Rui
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 10/19] hwmon/coretemp: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:29     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Zhang Rui
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 11/19] topology: Create package_cpus sysfs attribute Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:29     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 12/19] topology: Create core_cpus and die_cpus sysfs attributes Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:30     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 13/19] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:31     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 14/19] perf/x86/intel/rapl: " Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:31     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-05-13 17:58   ` [PATCH 15/19] perf/x86/intel/cstate: " Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:32     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-05-13 17:59   ` [PATCH 16/19] thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Cosmetic: Rename internal variables to zones from packages Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:33     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:59   ` [PATCH 17/19] hwmon/coretemp: " Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:34     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-13 17:59   ` [PATCH 18/19] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cosmetic renames in response to multi-die/pkg support Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:34     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-05-13 17:59   ` [PATCH 19/19] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Cosmetic rename internal variables " Len Brown
2019-05-23  9:35     ` [tip:x86/topology] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2019-05-23  9:22   ` [tip:x86/topology] x86/topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package support tip-bot for Len Brown
2019-05-15  8:55 ` [PATCH 0/19] v6 multi-die/package topology support Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-15 16:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-22 20:44 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7b23d2d26d717b8e14ba137c94b70943f1ae4b5c.1557769318.git.len.brown@intel.com \
    --to=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.