All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yangbo.lu@nxp.com,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	Mark.Rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	Andre.Przywara@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Steve.Capper@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 7/9] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:49:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bd3a66253ca4b7adbe2294eb598a23f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111062211.33144-8-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 2020-11-11 06:22, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync between guest and 
> host
> in arm/arm64 virtualization environment. Time in guest will drift 
> compared
> with host after boot up as they may both use third party time sources
> to correct their time respectively. The time deviation will be in order
> of milliseconds. But in some scenarios,like in cloud envirenment, we 
> ask

environment

> for higher time precision.
> 
> kvm ptp clock, which chooses the host clock source as a reference
> clock to sync time between guest and host, has been adopted by x86
> which takes the time sync order from milliseconds to nanoseconds.
> 
> This patch enables kvm ptp clock for arm/arm64 and improves clock sync 
> precison

precision

> significantly.
> 
> Test result comparisons between with kvm ptp clock and without it in 
> arm/arm64
> are as follows. This test derived from the result of command 'chronyc
> sources'. we should take more care of the last sample column which 
> shows
> the offset between the local clock and the source at the last 
> measurement.
> 
> no kvm ptp in guest:
> MS Name/IP address   Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    13  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    21  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    29  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    37  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    45  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    53  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    61  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377     4   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    12   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    20   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> 
> in host:
> MS Name/IP address   Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    72   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    92   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   112   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377     2   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    22   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    43   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    63   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    83   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   103   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   123   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> 
> The dns1.synet.edu.cn is the network reference clock for guest and
> 120.25.115.20 is the network reference clock for host. we can't get the
> clock error between guest and host directly, but a roughly estimated 
> value
> will be in order of hundreds of us to ms.
> 
> with kvm ptp in guest:
> chrony has been disabled in host to remove the disturb by network 
> clock.
> 
> MS Name/IP address         Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     -7ns[   +1ns] +/-    
> 3ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     +1ns[  +16ns] +/-    
> 3ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     6     -4ns[   -0ns] +/-    
> 6ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     6     -8ns[  -12ns] +/-    
> 5ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     5     +2ns[   +4ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    13     +2ns[   +4ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    12     -4ns[   -6ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    11     -8ns[  -11ns] +/-    
> 6ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    10    -14ns[  -20ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     +4ns[   +5ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> 
> The PHC0 is the ptp clock which choose the host clock as its source
> clock. So we can see that the clock difference between host and guest
> is in order of ns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/ptp/Kconfig                  |  2 +-
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                 |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c            | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index d55acffb0b90..b33c5a663d30 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
>  #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> 
>  #include <asm/arch_timer.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
> @@ -1650,3 +1651,30 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct
> acpi_table_header *table)
>  }
>  TIMER_ACPI_DECLARE(arch_timer, ACPI_SIG_GTDT, arch_timer_acpi_init);
>  #endif
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp(u64 *cycle, struct timespec64 *ts,
> +			      struct clocksource **cs)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res hvc_res;
> +	ktime_t ktime;
> +	u32 ptp_counter;
> +
> +	if (arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI)
> +		ptp_counter = ARM_PTP_VIRT_COUNTER;
> +	else
> +		ptp_counter = ARM_PTP_PHY_COUNTER;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ptp_counter, &hvc_res);
> +
> +	if ((int)(hvc_res.a0) < 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ktime = (u64)hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;
> +	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime);
> +	*cycle = (u64)hvc_res.a2 << 32 | hvc_res.a3;

Endianness.

> +	*cs = &clocksource_counter;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp);
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> index 942f72d8151d..677c7f696b70 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>  config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
>  	tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
>  	depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
> -	depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
> +	depends on KVM_GUEST && X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && 
> ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  This driver adds support for using kvm infrastructure as a PTP
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Makefile b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> index 699a4e4d19c2..9fa5ede44b2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> 
>  ptp-y					:= ptp_clock.o ptp_chardev.o ptp_sysfs.o
>  ptp_kvm-$(CONFIG_X86)			:= ptp_kvm_x86.o ptp_kvm_common.o
> +ptp_kvm-$(CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC)	:= ptp_kvm_arm.o ptp_kvm_common.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK)		+= ptp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_DTE)	+= ptp_dte.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_INES)	+= ptp_ines.o
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2212827c0384
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
> + *  All Rights Reserved
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/timecounter.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_KVM_PTP);
> +	if (ret <= 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +{
> +	ktime_t ktime;
> +	struct arm_smccc_res hvc_res;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_PTP_NONE_COUNTER, &hvc_res);

I really don't see the need to use a non-architectural counter ID.
Using the virtual counter ID should just be fine, and shouldn't
lead to any issue.

Am I missing something?

> +	if ((int)(hvc_res.a0) < 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ktime = (u64)hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;

Endianness.

> +	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Cc: justin.he@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, steven.price@arm.com,
	Andre.Przywara@arm.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
	yangbo.lu@nxp.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	nd@arm.com, will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 7/9] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:49:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bd3a66253ca4b7adbe2294eb598a23f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111062211.33144-8-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 2020-11-11 06:22, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync between guest and 
> host
> in arm/arm64 virtualization environment. Time in guest will drift 
> compared
> with host after boot up as they may both use third party time sources
> to correct their time respectively. The time deviation will be in order
> of milliseconds. But in some scenarios,like in cloud envirenment, we 
> ask

environment

> for higher time precision.
> 
> kvm ptp clock, which chooses the host clock source as a reference
> clock to sync time between guest and host, has been adopted by x86
> which takes the time sync order from milliseconds to nanoseconds.
> 
> This patch enables kvm ptp clock for arm/arm64 and improves clock sync 
> precison

precision

> significantly.
> 
> Test result comparisons between with kvm ptp clock and without it in 
> arm/arm64
> are as follows. This test derived from the result of command 'chronyc
> sources'. we should take more care of the last sample column which 
> shows
> the offset between the local clock and the source at the last 
> measurement.
> 
> no kvm ptp in guest:
> MS Name/IP address   Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    13  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    21  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    29  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    37  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    45  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    53  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    61  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377     4   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    12   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    20   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> 
> in host:
> MS Name/IP address   Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    72   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    92   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   112   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377     2   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    22   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    43   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    63   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    83   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   103   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   123   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> 
> The dns1.synet.edu.cn is the network reference clock for guest and
> 120.25.115.20 is the network reference clock for host. we can't get the
> clock error between guest and host directly, but a roughly estimated 
> value
> will be in order of hundreds of us to ms.
> 
> with kvm ptp in guest:
> chrony has been disabled in host to remove the disturb by network 
> clock.
> 
> MS Name/IP address         Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     -7ns[   +1ns] +/-    
> 3ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     +1ns[  +16ns] +/-    
> 3ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     6     -4ns[   -0ns] +/-    
> 6ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     6     -8ns[  -12ns] +/-    
> 5ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     5     +2ns[   +4ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    13     +2ns[   +4ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    12     -4ns[   -6ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    11     -8ns[  -11ns] +/-    
> 6ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    10    -14ns[  -20ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     +4ns[   +5ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> 
> The PHC0 is the ptp clock which choose the host clock as its source
> clock. So we can see that the clock difference between host and guest
> is in order of ns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/ptp/Kconfig                  |  2 +-
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                 |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c            | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index d55acffb0b90..b33c5a663d30 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
>  #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> 
>  #include <asm/arch_timer.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
> @@ -1650,3 +1651,30 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct
> acpi_table_header *table)
>  }
>  TIMER_ACPI_DECLARE(arch_timer, ACPI_SIG_GTDT, arch_timer_acpi_init);
>  #endif
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp(u64 *cycle, struct timespec64 *ts,
> +			      struct clocksource **cs)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res hvc_res;
> +	ktime_t ktime;
> +	u32 ptp_counter;
> +
> +	if (arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI)
> +		ptp_counter = ARM_PTP_VIRT_COUNTER;
> +	else
> +		ptp_counter = ARM_PTP_PHY_COUNTER;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ptp_counter, &hvc_res);
> +
> +	if ((int)(hvc_res.a0) < 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ktime = (u64)hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;
> +	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime);
> +	*cycle = (u64)hvc_res.a2 << 32 | hvc_res.a3;

Endianness.

> +	*cs = &clocksource_counter;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp);
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> index 942f72d8151d..677c7f696b70 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>  config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
>  	tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
>  	depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
> -	depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
> +	depends on KVM_GUEST && X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && 
> ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  This driver adds support for using kvm infrastructure as a PTP
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Makefile b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> index 699a4e4d19c2..9fa5ede44b2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> 
>  ptp-y					:= ptp_clock.o ptp_chardev.o ptp_sysfs.o
>  ptp_kvm-$(CONFIG_X86)			:= ptp_kvm_x86.o ptp_kvm_common.o
> +ptp_kvm-$(CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC)	:= ptp_kvm_arm.o ptp_kvm_common.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK)		+= ptp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_DTE)	+= ptp_dte.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_INES)	+= ptp_ines.o
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2212827c0384
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
> + *  All Rights Reserved
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/timecounter.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_KVM_PTP);
> +	if (ret <= 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +{
> +	ktime_t ktime;
> +	struct arm_smccc_res hvc_res;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_PTP_NONE_COUNTER, &hvc_res);

I really don't see the need to use a non-architectural counter ID.
Using the virtual counter ID should just be fine, and shouldn't
lead to any issue.

Am I missing something?

> +	if ((int)(hvc_res.a0) < 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ktime = (u64)hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;

Endianness.

> +	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Cc: Mark.Rutland@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, Steve.Capper@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
	steven.price@arm.com, Andre.Przywara@arm.com,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, yangbo.lu@nxp.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, nd@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 7/9] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:49:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bd3a66253ca4b7adbe2294eb598a23f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111062211.33144-8-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 2020-11-11 06:22, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync between guest and 
> host
> in arm/arm64 virtualization environment. Time in guest will drift 
> compared
> with host after boot up as they may both use third party time sources
> to correct their time respectively. The time deviation will be in order
> of milliseconds. But in some scenarios,like in cloud envirenment, we 
> ask

environment

> for higher time precision.
> 
> kvm ptp clock, which chooses the host clock source as a reference
> clock to sync time between guest and host, has been adopted by x86
> which takes the time sync order from milliseconds to nanoseconds.
> 
> This patch enables kvm ptp clock for arm/arm64 and improves clock sync 
> precison

precision

> significantly.
> 
> Test result comparisons between with kvm ptp clock and without it in 
> arm/arm64
> are as follows. This test derived from the result of command 'chronyc
> sources'. we should take more care of the last sample column which 
> shows
> the offset between the local clock and the source at the last 
> measurement.
> 
> no kvm ptp in guest:
> MS Name/IP address   Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    13  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    21  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    29  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    37  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    45  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    53  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    61  +1040us[+1581us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377     4   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    12   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> ^* dns1.synet.edu.cn      2   6   377    20   -130us[ +796us] +/-   
> 21ms
> 
> in host:
> MS Name/IP address   Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    72   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    92   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   112   -470us[ -603us] +/-   
> 18ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377     2   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    22   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    43   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    63   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377    83   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   103   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> ^* 120.25.115.20          2   7   377   123   +872ns[-6808ns] +/-   
> 17ms
> 
> The dns1.synet.edu.cn is the network reference clock for guest and
> 120.25.115.20 is the network reference clock for host. we can't get the
> clock error between guest and host directly, but a roughly estimated 
> value
> will be in order of hundreds of us to ms.
> 
> with kvm ptp in guest:
> chrony has been disabled in host to remove the disturb by network 
> clock.
> 
> MS Name/IP address         Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
> ========================================================================
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     -7ns[   +1ns] +/-    
> 3ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     +1ns[  +16ns] +/-    
> 3ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     6     -4ns[   -0ns] +/-    
> 6ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     6     -8ns[  -12ns] +/-    
> 5ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     5     +2ns[   +4ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    13     +2ns[   +4ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    12     -4ns[   -6ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    11     -8ns[  -11ns] +/-    
> 6ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377    10    -14ns[  -20ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> * PHC0                    0   3   377     8     +4ns[   +5ns] +/-    
> 4ns
> 
> The PHC0 is the ptp clock which choose the host clock as its source
> clock. So we can see that the clock difference between host and guest
> is in order of ns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/ptp/Kconfig                  |  2 +-
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                 |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c            | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index d55acffb0b90..b33c5a663d30 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
>  #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> 
>  #include <asm/arch_timer.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
> @@ -1650,3 +1651,30 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct
> acpi_table_header *table)
>  }
>  TIMER_ACPI_DECLARE(arch_timer, ACPI_SIG_GTDT, arch_timer_acpi_init);
>  #endif
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp(u64 *cycle, struct timespec64 *ts,
> +			      struct clocksource **cs)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res hvc_res;
> +	ktime_t ktime;
> +	u32 ptp_counter;
> +
> +	if (arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI)
> +		ptp_counter = ARM_PTP_VIRT_COUNTER;
> +	else
> +		ptp_counter = ARM_PTP_PHY_COUNTER;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ptp_counter, &hvc_res);
> +
> +	if ((int)(hvc_res.a0) < 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ktime = (u64)hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;
> +	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime);
> +	*cycle = (u64)hvc_res.a2 << 32 | hvc_res.a3;

Endianness.

> +	*cs = &clocksource_counter;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp);
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> index 942f72d8151d..677c7f696b70 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>  config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
>  	tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
>  	depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
> -	depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
> +	depends on KVM_GUEST && X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && 
> ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  This driver adds support for using kvm infrastructure as a PTP
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Makefile b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> index 699a4e4d19c2..9fa5ede44b2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> 
>  ptp-y					:= ptp_clock.o ptp_chardev.o ptp_sysfs.o
>  ptp_kvm-$(CONFIG_X86)			:= ptp_kvm_x86.o ptp_kvm_common.o
> +ptp_kvm-$(CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC)	:= ptp_kvm_arm.o ptp_kvm_common.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK)		+= ptp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_DTE)	+= ptp_dte.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK_INES)	+= ptp_ines.o
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2212827c0384
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_arm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.
> + *  All Rights Reserved
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/timecounter.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> +#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_KVM_PTP);
> +	if (ret <= 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +{
> +	ktime_t ktime;
> +	struct arm_smccc_res hvc_res;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_PTP_NONE_COUNTER, &hvc_res);

I really don't see the need to use a non-architectural counter ID.
Using the virtual counter ID should just be fine, and shouldn't
lead to any issue.

Am I missing something?

> +	if ((int)(hvc_res.a0) < 0)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	ktime = (u64)hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;

Endianness.

> +	*ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11  6:22 [PATCH v15 0/9] Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 1/9] arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11 10:38   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 12:23   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 16:54   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 2/9] arm/arm64: KVM: Advertise KVM UID to guests via SMCCC Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 3/9] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm module to make it arch-independent Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11 13:10   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 13:10     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 14:36   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 14:36     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 4/9] time: Add mechanism to recognize clocksource in time_get_snapshot Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 5/9] clocksource: Add clocksource id for arm arch counter Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 6/9] arm64/kvm: Add hypercall service for kvm ptp Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-23 10:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 10:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 10:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 11:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 11:59       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 11:59       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  5:11       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:11         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:11         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:20     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:20       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:20       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  9:07       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  9:07         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  9:07         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 10:14         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24 10:14           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24 10:14           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 7/9] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  8:52   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11  8:52     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 13:44   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11 13:44     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-04  9:46     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-23 10:49   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-23 10:49     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 10:49     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  5:37     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:37       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:37       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  9:04       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  9:04         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  9:04         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 10:18         ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24 10:18           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24 10:18           ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 8/9] doc: add ptp_kvm introduction for arm64 support Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-23 10:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 10:58     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 10:58     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24  5:21     ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:21       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-24  5:21       ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22 ` [PATCH v15 9/9] arm64: Add kvm capability check extension for ptp_kvm Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-11  6:22   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-23  9:26 ` [PATCH v15 0/9] Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-11-23  9:26   ` Jianyong Wu
2020-11-23  9:26   ` Jianyong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bd3a66253ca4b7adbe2294eb598a23f@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.