All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	robdclark@gmail.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	seanpaul@chromium.org, swboyd@chromium.org,
	nganji@codeaurora.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org,
	khsieh@codeaurora.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devcoredump: increase the device delete timeout to 10 mins
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 09:24:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7db7d01fcf5a3edce61161769c0e6eb1541237bf.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9156bde-137c-2fac-19e0-b205ab4d6016@quicinc.com>

On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 23:52 -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> The thread is writing the data to a file in local storage. From our 
> profiling, the read is the one taking the time not the write.
> 

That seems kind of hard to believe, let's say it's a 4/3 split (4
minutes reading, 3 minutes writing, to make read > write as you say),
and 3MiB size, that'd mean you get 12.8KiB/sec? That seems implausibly
low, unless you're reading with really tiny buffers?

Can you strace this somehow? (with timestamp info)

> Just doubling what we have currently. I am not sure how the current 5 
> mins timeout came from.
> 

To be honest it came out of thin air, and wasn't really meant as a limit
on how fast you can read (feels like even if it's tens of MiB you should
read it in milliseconds into userspace), but more of a maximum time that
we're willing to waste kernel memory if nobody is around to read the
data.

I thought it'd be better if we could somehow pin it while the userspace
is reading it, but OTOH maybe that's actually bad, since that means
userspace (though suitably privileged) could pin this kernel memory
indefinitely.

johannes

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	swboyd@chromium.org, khsieh@codeaurora.org,
	nganji@codeaurora.org, seanpaul@chromium.org,
	dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, aravindh@codeaurora.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devcoredump: increase the device delete timeout to 10 mins
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 09:24:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7db7d01fcf5a3edce61161769c0e6eb1541237bf.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9156bde-137c-2fac-19e0-b205ab4d6016@quicinc.com>

On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 23:52 -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> The thread is writing the data to a file in local storage. From our 
> profiling, the read is the one taking the time not the write.
> 

That seems kind of hard to believe, let's say it's a 4/3 split (4
minutes reading, 3 minutes writing, to make read > write as you say),
and 3MiB size, that'd mean you get 12.8KiB/sec? That seems implausibly
low, unless you're reading with really tiny buffers?

Can you strace this somehow? (with timestamp info)

> Just doubling what we have currently. I am not sure how the current 5 
> mins timeout came from.
> 

To be honest it came out of thin air, and wasn't really meant as a limit
on how fast you can read (feels like even if it's tens of MiB you should
read it in milliseconds into userspace), but more of a maximum time that
we're willing to waste kernel memory if nobody is around to read the
data.

I thought it'd be better if we could somehow pin it while the userspace
is reading it, but OTOH maybe that's actually bad, since that means
userspace (though suitably privileged) could pin this kernel memory
indefinitely.

johannes

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-12  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 19:44 [PATCH] devcoredump: increase the device delete timeout to 10 mins Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-08 19:44 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-08 20:35 ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-08 20:35   ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-08 21:04   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-08 21:04     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-08 21:12     ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-08 21:12       ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-08 21:40       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-08 21:40         ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-08 21:54         ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-09  1:55           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09  1:55             ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09  7:50             ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-09 16:29               ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 16:29                 ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-11 11:09             ` Greg KH
2022-02-11 11:09               ` Greg KH
2022-02-11 11:09 ` Greg KH
2022-02-11 11:09   ` Greg KH
2022-02-11 18:59   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-11 18:59     ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-12  7:04     ` Greg KH
2022-02-12  7:04       ` Greg KH
2022-02-12  7:52       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-12  7:52         ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-12  8:24         ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2022-02-12  8:24           ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-12  8:35           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-12  8:35             ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-28 21:38             ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-28 21:38               ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-03-01  6:48               ` David Laight
2022-03-01 17:45                 ` Rob Clark
2022-03-01 17:45                   ` Rob Clark
2022-03-11 11:53                   ` Johannes Berg
2022-03-11 11:53                     ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-12  8:29         ` Greg KH
2022-02-12  8:29           ` Greg KH
2022-02-12  8:33           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-12  8:33             ` Abhinav Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7db7d01fcf5a3edce61161769c0e6eb1541237bf.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=aravindh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khsieh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nganji@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.