All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: m18063 <Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <nsekhar@ti.com>, <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drivers: misc: eeprom: at24: support reading mac eeprom from different addresses
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:33:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fa4b55d-12dd-3687-5ffc-eef96a002533@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b67a323b-5562-1259-08f1-fa7ee3509e8b@lechnology.com>



On 29.06.2017 18:32, David Lechner wrote:
> On 06/29/2017 06:39 AM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Add support for reading from different offsets of EEPROM.
>> The offset is initialized via device tree. If nothing is
>> given as input the old value, 0x90, is used. In this way
>> the driver could be used as generic driver for different
>> vendor memories by only changing the reading offset via
>> device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c         | 5 ++++-
>>   include/linux/platform_data/at24.h | 1 +
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> index 764ff5df..53c5fb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_eeprom_read_mac(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,
>>       memset(msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
>>       msg[0].addr = client->addr;
>>       msg[0].buf = addrbuf;
>> -    addrbuf[0] = 0x90 + offset;
>> +    addrbuf[0] = at24->chip.offset + offset;
>>       msg[0].len = 1;
>>       msg[1].addr = client->addr;
>>       msg[1].flags = I2C_M_RD;
>> @@ -581,6 +581,9 @@ static void at24_get_pdata(struct device *dev, struct at24_platform_data *chip)
>>            */
>>           chip->page_size = 1;
>>       }
>> +    err = device_property_read_u8(dev, "start-offset", &chip->offset);
> 
> Why use u8 here? I have an at24 EEPROM that uses 16-bit addressing where the MAC address is stored at 0x3F06. Seems like it would be better to just use u32, then you don't have to mess with /bits/ in the device tree binding.
Agree! I will use u32 instead. It is better that way.

Thanks,
Claudiu
> 
>> +    if (err)
>> +        chip->offset = 0x90;
>>   }
>>     static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h b/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h
>> index 271a4e2..d55c454 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct at24_platform_data {
>>   #define AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR    BIT(4)    /* take always 8 addresses (24c00) */
>>   #define AT24_FLAG_SERIAL    BIT(3)    /* factory-programmed serial number */
>>   #define AT24_FLAG_MAC        BIT(2)    /* factory-programmed mac address */
>> +    u8        offset;
>>         void        (*setup)(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, void *context);
>>       void        *context;
>>
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: m18063 <Claudiu.Beznea-UWL1GkI3JZL3oGB3hsPCZA@public.gmane.org>
To: David Lechner <david-nq/r/kbU++upp/zk7JDF2g@public.gmane.org>,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
	wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	nicolas.ferre-UWL1GkI3JZL3oGB3hsPCZA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] drivers: misc: eeprom: at24: support reading mac eeprom from different addresses
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:33:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fa4b55d-12dd-3687-5ffc-eef96a002533@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b67a323b-5562-1259-08f1-fa7ee3509e8b-nq/r/kbU++upp/zk7JDF2g@public.gmane.org>



On 29.06.2017 18:32, David Lechner wrote:
> On 06/29/2017 06:39 AM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Add support for reading from different offsets of EEPROM.
>> The offset is initialized via device tree. If nothing is
>> given as input the old value, 0x90, is used. In this way
>> the driver could be used as generic driver for different
>> vendor memories by only changing the reading offset via
>> device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea-UWL1GkI3JZL3oGB3hsPCZA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c         | 5 ++++-
>>   include/linux/platform_data/at24.h | 1 +
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> index 764ff5df..53c5fb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_eeprom_read_mac(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,
>>       memset(msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
>>       msg[0].addr = client->addr;
>>       msg[0].buf = addrbuf;
>> -    addrbuf[0] = 0x90 + offset;
>> +    addrbuf[0] = at24->chip.offset + offset;
>>       msg[0].len = 1;
>>       msg[1].addr = client->addr;
>>       msg[1].flags = I2C_M_RD;
>> @@ -581,6 +581,9 @@ static void at24_get_pdata(struct device *dev, struct at24_platform_data *chip)
>>            */
>>           chip->page_size = 1;
>>       }
>> +    err = device_property_read_u8(dev, "start-offset", &chip->offset);
> 
> Why use u8 here? I have an at24 EEPROM that uses 16-bit addressing where the MAC address is stored at 0x3F06. Seems like it would be better to just use u32, then you don't have to mess with /bits/ in the device tree binding.
Agree! I will use u32 instead. It is better that way.

Thanks,
Claudiu
> 
>> +    if (err)
>> +        chip->offset = 0x90;
>>   }
>>     static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h b/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h
>> index 271a4e2..d55c454 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/at24.h
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct at24_platform_data {
>>   #define AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR    BIT(4)    /* take always 8 addresses (24c00) */
>>   #define AT24_FLAG_SERIAL    BIT(3)    /* factory-programmed serial number */
>>   #define AT24_FLAG_MAC        BIT(2)    /* factory-programmed mac address */
>> +    u8        offset;
>>         void        (*setup)(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, void *context);
>>       void        *context;
>>
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-29 11:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add at24 functionality to read form different EEPROM offsets Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:39 ` Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: document all at24 bindings Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:39   ` Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] drivers: misc: eeprom: at24: support reading mac eeprom from different addresses Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:39   ` Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:56   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-29 13:30     ` Ludovic Desroches
2017-07-05  9:31       ` m18063
2017-06-29 15:32   ` David Lechner
2017-06-29 15:32     ` David Lechner
2017-07-05  9:33     ` m18063 [this message]
2017-07-05  9:33       ` m18063
2017-06-30  7:20   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2017-06-30  7:20     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2017-07-05  9:33     ` m18063
2017-07-05  9:33       ` m18063
2017-06-29 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: document "start-offset" binding Claudiu Beznea
2017-06-29 11:39   ` Claudiu Beznea
2017-07-06 15:45   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7fa4b55d-12dd-3687-5ffc-eef96a002533@microchip.com \
    --to=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.