All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:06:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81c9f88f-7e8f-0ca6-56b8-049571af6809@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-26-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 4/18/22 07:59, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Replace the single skb pointer in an audit_buffer with
> a list of skb pointers. Add the audit_stamp information
> to the audit_buffer as there's no guarantee that there
> will be an audit_context containing the stamp associated
> with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
> records (none are currently defined) as have been added
> to the list.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

I agree with Paul that audit_buffer_aux_new() and
audit_buffer_aux_end() belong in this patch


> ---
>  kernel/audit.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 6b6c089512f7..4d44c05053b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static struct audit_ctl_mutex {
>   * to place it on a transmit queue.  Multiple audit_buffers can be in
>   * use simultaneously. */
>  struct audit_buffer {
> -	struct sk_buff       *skb;	/* formatted skb ready to send */
> +	struct sk_buff       *skb;	/* the skb for audit_log functions */
> +	struct sk_buff_head  skb_list;	/* formatted skbs, ready to send */
>  	struct audit_context *ctx;	/* NULL or associated context */
> +	struct audit_stamp   stamp;	/* audit stamp for these records */
>  	gfp_t		     gfp_mask;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1765,10 +1767,13 @@ __setup("audit_backlog_limit=", audit_backlog_limit_set);
>  
>  static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  {
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
>  	if (!ab)
>  		return;
>  
> -	kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> +	while((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
> +		kfree_skb(skb);

we still have and ab->skb can we have a debug check that its freed by walking the queue?

>  	kmem_cache_free(audit_buffer_cache, ab);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1784,8 +1789,12 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
>  	ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, gfp_mask);
>  	if (!ab->skb)
>  		goto err;
> +
> +	skb_queue_head_init(&ab->skb_list);
> +	skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
> +
>  	if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> -		goto err;
> +		kfree_skb(ab->skb);

why is this no longer an error?

>  
>  	ab->ctx = ctx;
>  	ab->gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
> @@ -1849,7 +1858,6 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  				     int type)
>  {
>  	struct audit_buffer *ab;
> -	struct audit_stamp stamp;
>  
>  	if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
>  		return NULL;
> @@ -1904,14 +1912,14 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &stamp);
> +	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &ab->stamp);
>  	/* cancel dummy context to enable supporting records */
>  	if (ctx)
>  		ctx->dummy = 0;
>  	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
> -			 (unsigned long long)stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> -			 stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> -			 stamp.serial);
> +			 (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> +			 ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> +			 ab->stamp.serial);
>  
>  	return ab;
>  }
> @@ -2402,26 +2410,14 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * audit_log_end - end one audit record
> - * @ab: the audit_buffer
> - *
> - * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
> - * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
> - * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
> - * irq context.  May be called in any context.
> + * __audit_log_end - enqueue one audit record
> + * @skb: the buffer to send
>   */
> -void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +static void __audit_log_end(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
>  
> -	if (!ab)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (audit_rate_check()) {
> -		skb = ab->skb;
> -		ab->skb = NULL;
> -
>  		/* setup the netlink header, see the comments in
>  		 * kauditd_send_multicast_skb() for length quirks */
>  		nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb);
> @@ -2432,6 +2428,26 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  		wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait);
>  	} else
>  		audit_log_lost("rate limit exceeded");
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * audit_log_end - end one audit record
> + * @ab: the audit_buffer
> + *
> + * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
> + * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
> + * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
> + * irq context.  May be called in any context.
> + */
> +void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +	if (!ab)
> +		return;
> +
> +	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
> +		__audit_log_end(skb);
>  
>  	audit_buffer_free(ab);
>  }


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:06:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81c9f88f-7e8f-0ca6-56b8-049571af6809@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-26-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 4/18/22 07:59, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Replace the single skb pointer in an audit_buffer with
> a list of skb pointers. Add the audit_stamp information
> to the audit_buffer as there's no guarantee that there
> will be an audit_context containing the stamp associated
> with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
> records (none are currently defined) as have been added
> to the list.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

I agree with Paul that audit_buffer_aux_new() and
audit_buffer_aux_end() belong in this patch


> ---
>  kernel/audit.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 6b6c089512f7..4d44c05053b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static struct audit_ctl_mutex {
>   * to place it on a transmit queue.  Multiple audit_buffers can be in
>   * use simultaneously. */
>  struct audit_buffer {
> -	struct sk_buff       *skb;	/* formatted skb ready to send */
> +	struct sk_buff       *skb;	/* the skb for audit_log functions */
> +	struct sk_buff_head  skb_list;	/* formatted skbs, ready to send */
>  	struct audit_context *ctx;	/* NULL or associated context */
> +	struct audit_stamp   stamp;	/* audit stamp for these records */
>  	gfp_t		     gfp_mask;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1765,10 +1767,13 @@ __setup("audit_backlog_limit=", audit_backlog_limit_set);
>  
>  static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  {
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
>  	if (!ab)
>  		return;
>  
> -	kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> +	while((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
> +		kfree_skb(skb);

we still have and ab->skb can we have a debug check that its freed by walking the queue?

>  	kmem_cache_free(audit_buffer_cache, ab);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1784,8 +1789,12 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
>  	ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, gfp_mask);
>  	if (!ab->skb)
>  		goto err;
> +
> +	skb_queue_head_init(&ab->skb_list);
> +	skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
> +
>  	if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> -		goto err;
> +		kfree_skb(ab->skb);

why is this no longer an error?

>  
>  	ab->ctx = ctx;
>  	ab->gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
> @@ -1849,7 +1858,6 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  				     int type)
>  {
>  	struct audit_buffer *ab;
> -	struct audit_stamp stamp;
>  
>  	if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
>  		return NULL;
> @@ -1904,14 +1912,14 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &stamp);
> +	audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &ab->stamp);
>  	/* cancel dummy context to enable supporting records */
>  	if (ctx)
>  		ctx->dummy = 0;
>  	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
> -			 (unsigned long long)stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> -			 stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> -			 stamp.serial);
> +			 (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> +			 ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> +			 ab->stamp.serial);
>  
>  	return ab;
>  }
> @@ -2402,26 +2410,14 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * audit_log_end - end one audit record
> - * @ab: the audit_buffer
> - *
> - * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
> - * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
> - * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
> - * irq context.  May be called in any context.
> + * __audit_log_end - enqueue one audit record
> + * @skb: the buffer to send
>   */
> -void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +static void __audit_log_end(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
>  
> -	if (!ab)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (audit_rate_check()) {
> -		skb = ab->skb;
> -		ab->skb = NULL;
> -
>  		/* setup the netlink header, see the comments in
>  		 * kauditd_send_multicast_skb() for length quirks */
>  		nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb);
> @@ -2432,6 +2428,26 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  		wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait);
>  	} else
>  		audit_log_lost("rate limit exceeded");
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * audit_log_end - end one audit record
> + * @ab: the audit_buffer
> + *
> + * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
> + * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
> + * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
> + * irq context.  May be called in any context.
> + */
> +void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +{
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +	if (!ab)
> +		return;
> +
> +	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
> +		__audit_log_end(skb);
>  
>  	audit_buffer_free(ab);
>  }

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220418145945.38797-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:51     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:51       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-26 23:15     ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 23:15       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:50     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-19 16:50     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-20 19:23       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-20 21:15         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21  3:22       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-21 16:50     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:49     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:49       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27  0:38     ` John Johansen
2022-04-27  0:38       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 18:02     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 18:02       ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:41     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:41       ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:51     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:51       ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 17:57       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 17:57         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:31     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:31       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:03       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:03         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:58         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:58           ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:18           ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:18             ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 15:49             ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 15:49               ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 16:02               ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 16:02                 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 20:55                 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 20:55                   ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:26     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:26       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-25 23:33     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:33       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:27     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:27       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26  1:06     ` John Johansen [this message]
2022-04-26  1:06       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:12       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:12         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:01         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:01           ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:28     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:28       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26  1:08     ` John Johansen
2022-04-26  1:08       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:15       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:15         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:07         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:07           ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:29     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:29       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26  3:37     ` John Johansen
2022-04-26  3:37       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:57       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:57         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:24         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:24           ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22  8:37     ` John Johansen
2022-04-22  8:37       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81c9f88f-7e8f-0ca6-56b8-049571af6809@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.