All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
	stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:08:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad1e85e1-8706-7b93-59cd-99ccef273be4@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 4/18/22 07:59, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a new audit record AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS.
> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
> 
>     type=MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS[1420]
>     msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
>     subj_apparmor=unconfined
>     subj_smack=_
> 
> When an audit event includes a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record
> the "subj=" field in other records in the event will be "subj=?".
> An AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is supplied when the system has
> multiple security modules that may make access decisions based
> on a subject security context.
> 
> Functions are created to manage the skb list in the audit_buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Besides moving the aux fns, and the whining below
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  1 +
>  kernel/audit.c             | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 8eda133ca4c1..af0aaccfaf57 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
>  #define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STCDEL	1417	/* NetLabel: del a static label */
>  #define AUDIT_MAC_CALIPSO_ADD	1418	/* NetLabel: add CALIPSO DOI entry */
>  #define AUDIT_MAC_CALIPSO_DEL	1419	/* NetLabel: del CALIPSO DOI entry */
> +#define AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS	1420	/* Multiple LSM task contexts */
>  
>  #define AUDIT_FIRST_KERN_ANOM_MSG   1700
>  #define AUDIT_LAST_KERN_ANOM_MSG    1799
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 4d44c05053b0..8ed2d717c217 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -2175,8 +2175,61 @@ void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
>  		audit_log_format(ab, "(null)");
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * audit_buffer_aux_new - Add an aux record buffer to the skb list
> + * @ab: audit_buffer
> + * @type: message type
> + *
> + * Aux records are allocated and added to the skb list of
> + * the "main" record. The ab->skb is reset to point to the
> + * aux record on its creation. When the aux record in complete
> + * ab->skb has to be reset to point to the "main" record.
> + * This allows the audit_log_ functions to be ignorant of
> + * which kind of record it is logging to. It also avoids adding
> + * special data for aux records.
> + *
> + * On success ab->skb will point to the new aux record.
> + * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM should allocation fail.
> + */
> +static int audit_buffer_aux_new(struct audit_buffer *ab, int type)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(ab->skb != skb_peek(&ab->skb_list));
> +
> +	ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, ab->gfp_mask);
> +	if (!ab->skb)
> +		goto err;
> +	if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> +		goto err;
> +	skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
> +
> +	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
> +			 (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> +			 ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> +			 ab->stamp.serial);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> +	ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
> +	return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * audit_buffer_aux_end - Switch back to the "main" record from an aux record
> + * @ab: audit_buffer
> + *
> + * Restores the "main" audit record to ab->skb.
> + */
> +static void audit_buffer_aux_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +{
> +	ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
> +}
> +
> +
>  int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	int error;
>  	struct lsmblob blob;
>  	struct lsmcontext context;
> @@ -2185,16 +2238,44 @@ int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  	if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, LSMBLOB_FIRST);
> +	if (!lsm_multiple_contexts()) {
> +		error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context,
> +						 LSMBLOB_FIRST);
> +		if (error) {
> +			if (error != -EINVAL)
> +				goto error_path;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
>  
> -	if (error) {
> -		if (error != -EINVAL)
> +		audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
> +		security_release_secctx(&context);
> +	} else {
> +		/* Multiple LSMs provide contexts. Include an aux record. */
> +		audit_log_format(ab, " subj=?");

just me whining, you sure we can't just drop subj= here

> +		error = audit_buffer_aux_new(ab, AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS);
> +		if (error)
>  			goto error_path;
> -		return 0;
> +		for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++) {
> +			if (blob.secid[i] == 0)
> +				continue;
> +			error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, i);
> +			if (error) {
> +				audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=?",
> +						 i ? " " : "",
> +						 lsm_slot_to_name(i));
> +				if (error != -EINVAL)
> +					audit_panic("error in audit_log_task_context");
> +			} else {
> +				audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=%s",
> +						 i ? " " : "",
> +						 lsm_slot_to_name(i),
> +						 context.context);
> +				security_release_secctx(&context);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		audit_buffer_aux_end(ab);
>  	}
>  
> -	audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
> -	security_release_secctx(&context);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  error_path:


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:08:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad1e85e1-8706-7b93-59cd-99ccef273be4@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 4/18/22 07:59, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Create a new audit record AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS.
> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
> 
>     type=MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS[1420]
>     msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
>     subj_apparmor=unconfined
>     subj_smack=_
> 
> When an audit event includes a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record
> the "subj=" field in other records in the event will be "subj=?".
> An AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is supplied when the system has
> multiple security modules that may make access decisions based
> on a subject security context.
> 
> Functions are created to manage the skb list in the audit_buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Besides moving the aux fns, and the whining below
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  1 +
>  kernel/audit.c             | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 8eda133ca4c1..af0aaccfaf57 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
>  #define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STCDEL	1417	/* NetLabel: del a static label */
>  #define AUDIT_MAC_CALIPSO_ADD	1418	/* NetLabel: add CALIPSO DOI entry */
>  #define AUDIT_MAC_CALIPSO_DEL	1419	/* NetLabel: del CALIPSO DOI entry */
> +#define AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS	1420	/* Multiple LSM task contexts */
>  
>  #define AUDIT_FIRST_KERN_ANOM_MSG   1700
>  #define AUDIT_LAST_KERN_ANOM_MSG    1799
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 4d44c05053b0..8ed2d717c217 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -2175,8 +2175,61 @@ void audit_log_key(struct audit_buffer *ab, char *key)
>  		audit_log_format(ab, "(null)");
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * audit_buffer_aux_new - Add an aux record buffer to the skb list
> + * @ab: audit_buffer
> + * @type: message type
> + *
> + * Aux records are allocated and added to the skb list of
> + * the "main" record. The ab->skb is reset to point to the
> + * aux record on its creation. When the aux record in complete
> + * ab->skb has to be reset to point to the "main" record.
> + * This allows the audit_log_ functions to be ignorant of
> + * which kind of record it is logging to. It also avoids adding
> + * special data for aux records.
> + *
> + * On success ab->skb will point to the new aux record.
> + * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM should allocation fail.
> + */
> +static int audit_buffer_aux_new(struct audit_buffer *ab, int type)
> +{
> +	WARN_ON(ab->skb != skb_peek(&ab->skb_list));
> +
> +	ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, ab->gfp_mask);
> +	if (!ab->skb)
> +		goto err;
> +	if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> +		goto err;
> +	skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
> +
> +	audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
> +			 (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
> +			 ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
> +			 ab->stamp.serial);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	kfree_skb(ab->skb);
> +	ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
> +	return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * audit_buffer_aux_end - Switch back to the "main" record from an aux record
> + * @ab: audit_buffer
> + *
> + * Restores the "main" audit record to ab->skb.
> + */
> +static void audit_buffer_aux_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> +{
> +	ab->skb = skb_peek(&ab->skb_list);
> +}
> +
> +
>  int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	int error;
>  	struct lsmblob blob;
>  	struct lsmcontext context;
> @@ -2185,16 +2238,44 @@ int audit_log_task_context(struct audit_buffer *ab)
>  	if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, LSMBLOB_FIRST);
> +	if (!lsm_multiple_contexts()) {
> +		error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context,
> +						 LSMBLOB_FIRST);
> +		if (error) {
> +			if (error != -EINVAL)
> +				goto error_path;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
>  
> -	if (error) {
> -		if (error != -EINVAL)
> +		audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
> +		security_release_secctx(&context);
> +	} else {
> +		/* Multiple LSMs provide contexts. Include an aux record. */
> +		audit_log_format(ab, " subj=?");

just me whining, you sure we can't just drop subj= here

> +		error = audit_buffer_aux_new(ab, AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS);
> +		if (error)
>  			goto error_path;
> -		return 0;
> +		for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++) {
> +			if (blob.secid[i] == 0)
> +				continue;
> +			error = security_secid_to_secctx(&blob, &context, i);
> +			if (error) {
> +				audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=?",
> +						 i ? " " : "",
> +						 lsm_slot_to_name(i));
> +				if (error != -EINVAL)
> +					audit_panic("error in audit_log_task_context");
> +			} else {
> +				audit_log_format(ab, "%ssubj_%s=%s",
> +						 i ? " " : "",
> +						 lsm_slot_to_name(i),
> +						 context.context);
> +				security_release_secctx(&context);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		audit_buffer_aux_end(ab);
>  	}
>  
> -	audit_log_format(ab, " subj=%s", context.context);
> -	security_release_secctx(&context);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  error_path:

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220418145945.38797-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:51     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:51       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-26 23:15     ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 23:15       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:50     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-19 16:50     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-20 19:23       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-20 21:15         ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21  3:22       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-21 16:50     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:49     ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:49       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27  0:38     ` John Johansen
2022-04-27  0:38       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 18:02     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 18:02       ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:41     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:41       ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:51     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19  0:51       ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 17:57       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 17:57         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:31     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:31       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:03       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:03         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:58         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:58           ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:18           ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:18             ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 15:49             ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 15:49               ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 16:02               ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 16:02                 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 20:55                 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 20:55                   ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:26     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:26       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-25 23:33     ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:33       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:27     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:27       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26  1:06     ` John Johansen
2022-04-26  1:06       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:12       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:12         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:01         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:01           ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:28     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:28       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26  1:08     ` John Johansen [this message]
2022-04-26  1:08       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:15       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:15         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:07         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:07           ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:29     ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:29       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26  3:37     ` John Johansen
2022-04-26  3:37       ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:57       ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:57         ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:24         ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:24           ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22  8:37     ` John Johansen
2022-04-22  8:37       ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59   ` [PATCH v35 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59     ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad1e85e1-8706-7b93-59cd-99ccef273be4@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.