All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luse, Paul E <paul.e.luse at intel.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SPDK] NBD with SPDK
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:41:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82C9F782B054C94B9FC04A331649C77AB8EBA3B0@FMSMSX126.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37036ADC-0776-4F70-B604-385FAB9A5F21@ebay.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4931 bytes --]

That's great.  Keep any eye out for the items Ben mentions below - at least the first one should be quick to implement and compare both profile data and measured performance.

Don’t' forget about the community meetings either, great place to chat about these kinds of things.  https://spdk.io/community/  Next one is tomorrow morn US time.

Thx
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: SPDK [mailto:spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Mittal, Rishabh via SPDK
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 6:50 PM
To: Harris, James R <james.r.harris(a)intel.com>; Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker(a)intel.com>; spdk(a)lists.01.org
Cc: Mittal, Rishabh <rimittal(a)ebay.com>; Chen, Xiaoxi <xiaoxchen(a)ebay.com>; Szmyd, Brian <bszmyd(a)ebay.com>; Kadayam, Hari <hkadayam(a)ebay.com>
Subject: Re: [SPDK] NBD with SPDK

Thanks. I will get the profiling by next week. 

On 8/15/19, 6:26 PM, "Harris, James R" <james.r.harris(a)intel.com> wrote:

    
    
    On 8/15/19, 4:34 PM, "Mittal, Rishabh" <rimittal(a)ebay.com> wrote:
    
        Hi Jim
        
        What tool you use to take profiling. 
    
    Hi Rishabh,
    
    Mostly I just use "perf top".
    
    -Jim
    
        
        Thanks
        Rishabh Mittal
        
        On 8/14/19, 9:54 AM, "Harris, James R" <james.r.harris(a)intel.com> wrote:
        
            
            
            On 8/14/19, 9:18 AM, "Walker, Benjamin" <benjamin.walker(a)intel.com> wrote:
            
            <trim>
                
                When an I/O is performed in the process initiating the I/O to a file, the data
                goes into the OS page cache buffers at a layer far above the bio stack
                (somewhere up in VFS). If SPDK were to reserve some memory and hand it off to
                your kernel driver, your kernel driver would still need to copy it to that
                location out of the page cache buffers. We can't safely share the page cache
                buffers with a user space process.
               
            I think Rishabh was suggesting the SPDK reserve the virtual address space only.
            Then the kernel could map the page cache buffers into that virtual address space.
            That would not require a data copy, but would require the mapping operations.
            
            I think the profiling data would be really helpful - to quantify how much of the 50us
            Is due to copying the 4KB of data.  That can help drive next steps on how to optimize
            the SPDK NBD module.
            
            Thanks,
            
            -Jim
            
            
                As Paul said, I'm skeptical that the memcpy is significant in the overall
                performance you're measuring. I encourage you to go look at some profiling data
                and confirm that the memcpy is really showing up. I suspect the overhead is
                instead primarily in these spots:
                
                1) Dynamic buffer allocation in the SPDK NBD backend.
                
                As Paul indicated, the NBD target is dynamically allocating memory for each I/O.
                The NBD backend wasn't designed to be fast - it was designed to be simple.
                Pooling would be a lot faster and is something fairly easy to implement.
                
                2) The way SPDK does the syscalls when it implements the NBD backend.
                
                Again, the code was designed to be simple, not high performance. It simply calls
                read() and write() on the socket for each command. There are much higher
                performance ways of doing this, they're just more complex to implement.
                
                3) The lack of multi-queue support in NBD
                
                Every I/O is funneled through a single sockpair up to user space. That means
                there is locking going on. I believe this is just a limitation of NBD today - it
                doesn't plug into the block-mq stuff in the kernel and expose multiple
                sockpairs. But someone more knowledgeable on the kernel stack would need to take
                a look.
                
                Thanks,
                Ben
                
                > 
                > Couple of things that I am not really sure in this flow is :- 1. How memory
                > registration is going to work with RDMA driver.
                > 2. What changes are required in spdk memory management
                > 
                > Thanks
                > Rishabh Mittal
                
            
            
        
        
    
    

_______________________________________________
SPDK mailing list
SPDK(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/spdk

             reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19 14:41 Luse, Paul E [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-23  1:03 [SPDK] NBD with SPDK Huang Zhiteng
2019-09-06 20:31 Kadayam, Hari
2019-09-06 17:13 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-09-06  2:14 Szmyd, Brian
2019-09-06  2:08 Huang Zhiteng
2019-09-05 22:00 Szmyd, Brian
2019-09-05 21:22 Walker, Benjamin
2019-09-05 20:11 Luse, Paul E
2019-09-04 23:27 Luse, Paul E
2019-09-04 23:03 Luse, Paul E
2019-09-04 18:08 Walker, Benjamin
2019-08-30 22:28 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-30 17:06 Walker, Benjamin
2019-08-30  1:05 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-16  1:50 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-16  1:26 Harris, James R
2019-08-15 23:34 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-14 17:55 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-14 17:05 Kadayam, Hari
2019-08-14 16:54 Harris, James R
2019-08-14 16:18 Walker, Benjamin
2019-08-14 14:28 Luse, Paul E
2019-08-13 22:08 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-13 21:45 Harris, James R
2019-08-13 19:55 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-12 18:41 Harris, James R
2019-08-12 18:11 Harris, James R
2019-08-11 23:33 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-11 22:51 Mittal, Rishabh
2019-08-11 19:53 Luse, Paul E
2019-08-11  1:08 Mittal, Rishabh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82C9F782B054C94B9FC04A331649C77AB8EBA3B0@FMSMSX126.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=spdk@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.