Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/9] clk: renesas: add R906G032 driver

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>]

On 2/23/23 08:17, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello Marek & Ralph,
> 
> marek.vasut@mailbox.org wrote on Thu, 23 Feb 2023 01:12:49 +0100:
> 
>> On 2/22/23 20:32, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 07:45:45PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 2/22/23 19:32, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> Are those fixes in mainline Linux ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, they are in mainline:
>>>>> 2dee50ab9e72 clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Fix UART clkgrp bitsel
>>>>>    merged into 6.0, and also backported to earlier LTS branches
>>>>> 2a6da4a11f47 clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Fix the RTC hclock description
>>>>>     merged into 5.19, seems to be missing from LTS branches
>>>>
>>>> Use Linux 6.2.y as a base then.
>>>
>>> Okay, done.
>>>    
>>>> And please submit the missing patches for LTS branch inclusion too if >> possible, I guess they were missing Fixes: tag ?
>>>
>>> Seems it was part of a series which added support for the RTC device:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220421090016.79517-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com/
>>> Since it is new feature, I guess one could argue that the clock table > fix is not needed in older LTS kernels, since no driver uses that clock.
>>> But most likely it was just overlooked. I'll check with Miquel.
>>
>> Much appreciated, thanks !
>>
>> +CC Miquel
> 
> As Ralph rightly pointed out, even though the clock description was
> wrong there was no user at that time so I did not bother with a Fixes
> tag. Anyhow, as the change does only impact the RTC clock, it should be
> harmless to backport if you want.

Either way is fine by me, I just want to be sure the u-boot clock tables 
are in sync with Linux as much as possible, and can be easily resynced 
in the future, that's all.