All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: "Feifei Wang" <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
	"Константин Ананьев" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	"Yuying Zhang" <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Beilei Xing" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:27:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83b9487385e04212847f7deea32efd82@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR08MB7718A351559025BA7B9008A4C852A@AS8PR08MB7718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>



> > > Define specific function implementation for i40e driver.
> > > Currently, mbufs recycle mode can support 128bit vector path and avx2
> > > path. And can be enabled both in fast free and no fast free mode.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > <mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <mailto:feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <mailto:ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > <mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 1 +
> > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 2 +
> > >  .../net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c | 140
> > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 32 ++++  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h |
> > > 4 +  drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 2 +
> > >  6 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index f9d8f9791f..d4eecd16cf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops i40e_eth_dev_ops =
> > {
> > >          .flow_ops_get = i40e_dev_flow_ops_get,
> > >          .rxq_info_get = i40e_rxq_info_get,
> > >          .txq_info_get = i40e_txq_info_get,
> > > + .recycle_rxq_info_get = i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get,
> > >          .rx_burst_mode_get = i40e_rx_burst_mode_get,
> > >          .tx_burst_mode_get = i40e_tx_burst_mode_get,
> > >          .timesync_enable = i40e_timesync_enable, diff --git
> > > a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > index 9b806d130e..b5b2d6cf2b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > @@ -1355,6 +1355,8 @@ void i40e_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > uint16_t queue_id,
> > >          struct rte_eth_rxq_info *qinfo);  void
> > > i40e_txq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> > >          struct rte_eth_txq_info *qinfo);
> > > +void i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t
> > > +queue_id,  struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info *recycle_rxq_info);
> > >  int i40e_rx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> > >                             struct rte_eth_burst_mode *mode);  int
> > > i40e_tx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..08d708fd7d
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Arm Limited.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <stdint.h>
> > > +#include <ethdev_driver.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "base/i40e_prototype.h"
> > > +#include "base/i40e_type.h"
> > > +#include "i40e_ethdev.h"
> > > +#include "i40e_rxtx.h"
> > > +
> > > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wcast-qual"
> > > +
> > > +void
> > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec(void *rx_queue, uint16_t
> > > +nb_mbufs) {  struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;  struct
> > > +i40e_rx_entry *rxep;  volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;  uint16_t
> > > +rx_id;  uint64_t paddr;  uint64_t dma_addr;  uint16_t i;
> > > +
> > > + rxdp = rxq->rx_ring + rxq->rxrearm_start; rxep =
> > > + &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rxrearm_start];
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nb_mbufs; i++) {
> > > + /* Initialize rxdp descs. */
> > > + paddr = (rxep[i].mbuf)->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> > dma_addr =
> > > + rte_cpu_to_le_64(paddr);
> > > + /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
> > > + rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = 0;
> > > + rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = dma_addr;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Update the descriptor initializer index */
> > > + rxq->rxrearm_start += nb_mbufs;
> > > + rx_id = rxq->rxrearm_start - 1;
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(rxq->rxrearm_start >= rxq->nb_rx_desc)) {
> > > + rxq->rxrearm_start = 0;
> > > + rx_id = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + rxq->rxrearm_nb -= nb_mbufs;
> > > +
> > > + rte_io_wmb();
> > > + /* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
> > > +I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id); }
> > > +
> > > +uint16_t
> > > +i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec(void *tx_queue,  struct
> > > +rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info *recycle_rxq_info) {  struct i40e_tx_queue
> > > +*txq = tx_queue;  struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;  struct rte_mbuf
> > > +**rxep;  struct rte_mbuf *m[RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ];  int i, j,
> > > +n;  uint16_t avail = 0;  uint16_t mbuf_ring_size =
> > > +recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size;
> > > + uint16_t mask = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size - 1;  uint16_t
> > > +refill_requirement = recycle_rxq_info->refill_requirement;
> > > + uint16_t refill_head = *recycle_rxq_info->refill_head;  uint16_t
> > > +receive_tail = *recycle_rxq_info->receive_tail;
> > > +
> > > + /* Get available recycling Rx buffers. */ avail = (mbuf_ring_size -
> > > + (refill_head - receive_tail)) & mask;
> > > +
> > > + /* Check Tx free thresh and Rx available space. */ if
> > > + (txq->nb_tx_free > txq->tx_free_thresh || avail <=
> > > + txq->tx_rs_thresh) return 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* check DD bits on threshold descriptor */ if
> > > + ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> > > + rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> > > + rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + n = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> > > +
> > > + /* Mbufs recycle mode can only support no ring buffer wrapping around.
> > > + * Two case for this:
> > > + *
> > > + * case 1: The refill head of Rx buffer ring needs to be aligned with
> > > + * mbuf ring size. In this case, the number of Tx freeing buffers
> > > + * should be equal to refill_requirement.
> > > + *
> > > + * case 2: The refill head of Rx ring buffer does not need to be
> > > + aligned
> > > + * with mbuf ring size. In this case, the update of refill head can
> > > + not
> > > + * exceed the Rx mbuf ring size.
> > > + */
> > > + if (refill_requirement != n ||
> > > + (!refill_requirement && (refill_head + n > mbuf_ring_size))) return
> > > + 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* First buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
> > > + * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1).
> > > + */
> > > + txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n - 1)]; rxep =
> > > + recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring; rxep += refill_head;
> > > +
> > > + if (txq->offloads & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
> > > + /* Directly put mbufs from Tx to Rx. */ for (i = 0; i < n; i++,
> > > + rxep++, txep++) *rxep = txep[0].mbuf; } else { for (i = 0, j = 0; i
> > > + < n; i++) {
> > > + /* Avoid txq contains buffers from expected mempool. */ if
> > > + (unlikely(recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool)) return 0;
> > > I don't think that it is possible to simply return 0 here:
> > > we might already have some mbufs inside rxep[], so we probably need to
> > > return that number (j).
> > >
> > > No, here is just pre-free, not actually put mbufs into rxeq.
> >
> > I understand that.
> > What I am saying: after you call pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf), you can’t keep it
> > in the txq anymore.
> > You have either to put it into rxep[], or back into mempool.
> > Also txq state (nb_tx_free, etc.) need to be updated.
> >
> > > After run out of the loop, we call rte_memcpy to actually copy mbufs
> > > into rxep.
> > > +
> > > + m[j] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > +
> > > + /* In case 1, each of Tx buffers should be the
> > > + * last reference.
> > > + */
> > > + if (unlikely(m[j] == NULL && refill_requirement)) return 0;
> > >
> > > same here, we can't simply return 0, it will introduce mbuf leakage.
> > > + /* In case 2, the number of valid Tx free
> > > + * buffers should be recorded.
> > > + */
> > > + j++;
> > > + }
> > > + rte_memcpy(rxep, m, sizeof(void *) * j);
> > > Wonder why do you need intermediate buffer for released mbufs?
> > > Why can't just:
> > > ...
> > > m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > ...
> > > rxep[j++] = m;
> > > ?
> > > Might save you few extra cycles.
> > > Sometimes ‘rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg’ can return NULL due to
> > > mbuf->refcnt > 1. So we should firstly ensure all ‘m’ are valid and
> > > then copy them into rxep.
> >
> > I understand that, but you can check is it NULL or not.
> For i40e rxq, it must rearm ' RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH ' pkts once a time
> based on its ring wrapping mechanism.
> 
> For i40e txq, it must free ' txq->tx_rs_thresh' pkts once a time.
> 
> So we need firstly ensure all tx free mbufs are valid, and then copy these into rxq.
> If not enough valid mbufs, it will break rxq's ring wrapping mechanism.
 
I think you can still copy mbufs into rxep[], if there are not enough mbufs,
you can still return 0 (or whatever is a proper value here), and that would mean
all these new rxep[] entries will be considered as invalid.
Anyway that's just a suggestion to avoid extra copy.

> 
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Update counters for Tx. */
> > > + txq->nb_tx_free = (uint16_t)(txq->nb_tx_free + txq->tx_rs_thresh);
> > > + txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_dd + txq->tx_rs_thresh);
> > > + if (txq->tx_next_dd >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
> > > + txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1);
> > > +
> > > + return n;
> > > +}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-24 16:46 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] net/i40e: enable direct re-arm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] ethdev: add API for " Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 19:38   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-12-26  9:49     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:31       ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] net/i40e: add direct re-arm mode internal API Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] examples/l3fwd: give an example for direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Morten Brørup
2021-12-28  6:55   ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-01-18 15:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 16:53       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-18 17:27         ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-27  5:24           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 16:45             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-02 19:46               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27  5:16         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-28  6:43       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-28  6:52         ` Feifei Wang
2022-01-27  4:06   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 17:13     ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-28 11:29     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 11:41     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-29  2:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  7:19     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30  9:31       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:15         ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30 15:58         ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-26  6:59           ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26  7:29       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26  7:36       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:04   ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-03  2:48     ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:56   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-25  7:57     ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue to Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 15:08     ` Morten Brørup
2023-05-31  6:10       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 12:53     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  2:55       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  7:10         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06  7:31           ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  8:34             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-07  0:00               ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-12  3:25                 ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:02     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  3:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  7:18         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06  7:58           ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  8:27             ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2023-06-12  3:05               ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:08     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  6:32       ` Feifei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83b9487385e04212847f7deea32efd82@huawei.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.