From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Justin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: Add platform device id for bcm63xx-wdt
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:34:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bee996-d9ea-ba85-d89f-64faf9a4a44a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02cb3c1a160854c92895d024e59a831b@milecki.pl>
On 10/29/21 5:37 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 2021-10-28 19:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In order to phase out bcm63xx_wdt and use bcm7038_wdt instead, introduce
>> a platform_device_id table that allows both names to be matched.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> index 506cd7ef9c77..2535f450e8a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> bcm7038_wdt_match[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm7038_wdt_match);
>>
>> +static const struct platform_device_id bcm7038_wdt_devtype[] = {
>> + { .name = "bcm7038-wdt" },
>> + { .name = "bcm63xx-wdt" },
>> + { /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bcm7038_wdt_devtype);
>
> Do we really want "bcm7038-wdt" here? I don't think it will ever be used
> as apparently BCM7038 uses DT.
Let me dig through the platform_device_id code, but I believe we somehow do.
--
Florian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Justin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: Add platform device id for bcm63xx-wdt
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:34:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bee996-d9ea-ba85-d89f-64faf9a4a44a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02cb3c1a160854c92895d024e59a831b@milecki.pl>
On 10/29/21 5:37 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 2021-10-28 19:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In order to phase out bcm63xx_wdt and use bcm7038_wdt instead, introduce
>> a platform_device_id table that allows both names to be matched.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> index 506cd7ef9c77..2535f450e8a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> bcm7038_wdt_match[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm7038_wdt_match);
>>
>> +static const struct platform_device_id bcm7038_wdt_devtype[] = {
>> + { .name = "bcm7038-wdt" },
>> + { .name = "bcm63xx-wdt" },
>> + { /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bcm7038_wdt_devtype);
>
> Do we really want "bcm7038-wdt" here? I don't think it will ever be used
> as apparently BCM7038 uses DT.
Let me dig through the platform_device_id code, but I believe we somehow do.
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 17:23 [PATCH 0/7] Removal of bcm63xx-wdt Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add BCM6345 compatible to BCM7038 binding Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-29 2:15 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-29 2:15 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: Support platform data configuration Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] watchdog: Allow building BCM7038_WDT for BCM63XX Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: Add platform device id for bcm63xx-wdt Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 18:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 18:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-29 12:37 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-10-29 12:37 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-10-29 18:34 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-10-29 18:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] MIPS: BCM63XX: Provide platform data to watchdog device Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 18:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 18:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-02 10:19 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-11-02 10:19 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-10-28 17:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] watchdog: Remove BCM63XX_WDT Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-10-28 18:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-28 18:20 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86bee996-d9ea-ba85-d89f-64faf9a4a44a@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=justinpopo6@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.