[PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[Marc Zyngier]

It recently became apparent that we are mapping each vcpu thread's
thread_info structure at EL2 for the sole purpose of checking on the
TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.

Given that this looks like a slightly over-engineered way of sharing a
single bit of information, let's move to a slightly more obvious
implementation by maintaining a vcpu-private shadow flag that
represents the same state.

I also take this opportunity to add what looks like a missing, and
nonetheless crucial piece of information to the FPSIMD code regarding
the way KVM (ab)uses the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE.

Lightly tested on an A53 box with a bunch of paranoia instances
running in both host and guests.

Marc Zyngier (4):
  KVM: arm64: Reorder vcpu flag definitions
  KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
  KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2
  arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 28 ++++++++++++-------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c              |  5 ++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 20 ++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  3 +--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c         |  1 -
 7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[Marc Zyngier]

It recently became apparent that we are mapping each vcpu thread's
thread_info structure at EL2 for the sole purpose of checking on the
TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.

Given that this looks like a slightly over-engineered way of sharing a
single bit of information, let's move to a slightly more obvious
implementation by maintaining a vcpu-private shadow flag that
represents the same state.

I also take this opportunity to add what looks like a missing, and
nonetheless crucial piece of information to the FPSIMD code regarding
the way KVM (ab)uses the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE.

Lightly tested on an A53 box with a bunch of paranoia instances
running in both host and guests.

Marc Zyngier (4):
  KVM: arm64: Reorder vcpu flag definitions
  KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
  KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2
  arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 28 ++++++++++++-------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c              |  5 ++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 20 ++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  3 +--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c         |  1 -
 7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[Marc Zyngier]

It recently became apparent that we are mapping each vcpu thread's
thread_info structure at EL2 for the sole purpose of checking on the
TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.

Given that this looks like a slightly over-engineered way of sharing a
single bit of information, let's move to a slightly more obvious
implementation by maintaining a vcpu-private shadow flag that
represents the same state.

I also take this opportunity to add what looks like a missing, and
nonetheless crucial piece of information to the FPSIMD code regarding
the way KVM (ab)uses the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE.

Lightly tested on an A53 box with a bunch of paranoia instances
running in both host and guests.

Marc Zyngier (4):
  KVM: arm64: Reorder vcpu flag definitions
  KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
  KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2
  arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 28 ++++++++++++-------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c              |  5 ++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 20 ++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  3 +--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c         |  1 -
 7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

[PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Reorder vcpu flag definitions

[Marc Zyngier]

The vcpu arch flags are in an interesting, semi random order.
As I have made the mistake of reusing a flag once, let's rework
this in an order that I find a bit less confusing.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d0221fb69a60..f856ab63f092 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -417,14 +417,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
 #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
 #define KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION	(1 << 8) /* Exception pending */
+/*
+ * Overlaps with KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK on purpose so that it can't be
+ * set together with an exception...
+ */
+#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 9) /* Increment PC */
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK		(7 << 9) /* Target EL/MODE */
-#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
-#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
-
-#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
 /*
  * When KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION is set, KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK can
  * take the following values:
@@ -442,11 +440,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1	(0 << 11)
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL2	(1 << 11)
 
-/*
- * Overlaps with KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK on purpose so that it can't be
- * set together with an exception...
- */
-#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 9) /* Increment PC */
+#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
+#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
+
+#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
 
 #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() &&			\
 			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Reorder vcpu flag definitions

[Marc Zyngier]

The vcpu arch flags are in an interesting, semi random order.
As I have made the mistake of reusing a flag once, let's rework
this in an order that I find a bit less confusing.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d0221fb69a60..f856ab63f092 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -417,14 +417,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
 #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
 #define KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION	(1 << 8) /* Exception pending */
+/*
+ * Overlaps with KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK on purpose so that it can't be
+ * set together with an exception...
+ */
+#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 9) /* Increment PC */
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK		(7 << 9) /* Target EL/MODE */
-#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
-#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
-
-#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
 /*
  * When KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION is set, KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK can
  * take the following values:
@@ -442,11 +440,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1	(0 << 11)
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL2	(1 << 11)
 
-/*
- * Overlaps with KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK on purpose so that it can't be
- * set together with an exception...
- */
-#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 9) /* Increment PC */
+#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
+#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
+
+#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
 
 #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() &&			\
 			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Reorder vcpu flag definitions

[Marc Zyngier]

The vcpu arch flags are in an interesting, semi random order.
As I have made the mistake of reusing a flag once, let's rework
this in an order that I find a bit less confusing.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d0221fb69a60..f856ab63f092 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -417,14 +417,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
 #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
 #define KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION	(1 << 8) /* Exception pending */
+/*
+ * Overlaps with KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK on purpose so that it can't be
+ * set together with an exception...
+ */
+#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 9) /* Increment PC */
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK		(7 << 9) /* Target EL/MODE */
-#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
-#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
-
-#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
-				 KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
 /*
  * When KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION is set, KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK can
  * take the following values:
@@ -442,11 +440,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1	(0 << 11)
 #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL2	(1 << 11)
 
-/*
- * Overlaps with KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK on purpose so that it can't be
- * set together with an exception...
- */
-#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 9) /* Increment PC */
+#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
+#define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
+
+#define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW | \
+				 KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
 
 #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() &&			\
 			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

[PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE

[Marc Zyngier]

We currently have to maintain a mapping the thread_info structure
at EL2 in order to be able to check the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.

In order to eventually get rid of this, start with a vcpu flag that
shadows the thread flag on each entry into the hypervisor.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                    | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f856ab63f092..5a05ff062458 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
 #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
+#define KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE	(1 << 14)
 
 #define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
 				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
@@ -737,6 +738,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
 /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxsync_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 24a1e86d7128..c610971c7e72 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -850,6 +850,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 
 		kvm_arm_setup_debug(vcpu);
+		kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(vcpu);
 
 		/**************************************************************
 		 * Enter the guest
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 5621020b28de..12186c7d8cd8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -86,6 +86,14 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED;
 }
 
+void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE))
+		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE;
+	else
+		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE;
+}
+
 /*
  * If the guest FPSIMD state was loaded, update the host's context
  * tracking data mark the CPU FPSIMD regs as dirty and belonging to vcpu
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index c6e98c7e918b..dbd721a450d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline bool update_fp_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * trap the accesses.
 	 */
 	if (!system_supports_fpsimd() ||
-	    vcpu->arch.host_thread_info->flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
+	    vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
 		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED |
 				      KVM_ARM64_FP_HOST);
 
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE

[Marc Zyngier]

We currently have to maintain a mapping the thread_info structure
at EL2 in order to be able to check the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.

In order to eventually get rid of this, start with a vcpu flag that
shadows the thread flag on each entry into the hypervisor.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                    | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f856ab63f092..5a05ff062458 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
 #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
+#define KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE	(1 << 14)
 
 #define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
 				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
@@ -737,6 +738,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
 /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxsync_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 24a1e86d7128..c610971c7e72 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -850,6 +850,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 
 		kvm_arm_setup_debug(vcpu);
+		kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(vcpu);
 
 		/**************************************************************
 		 * Enter the guest
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 5621020b28de..12186c7d8cd8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -86,6 +86,14 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED;
 }
 
+void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE))
+		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE;
+	else
+		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE;
+}
+
 /*
  * If the guest FPSIMD state was loaded, update the host's context
  * tracking data mark the CPU FPSIMD regs as dirty and belonging to vcpu
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index c6e98c7e918b..dbd721a450d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline bool update_fp_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * trap the accesses.
 	 */
 	if (!system_supports_fpsimd() ||
-	    vcpu->arch.host_thread_info->flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
+	    vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
 		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED |
 				      KVM_ARM64_FP_HOST);
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE

[Marc Zyngier]

We currently have to maintain a mapping the thread_info structure
at EL2 in order to be able to check the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.

In order to eventually get rid of this, start with a vcpu flag that
shadows the thread flag on each entry into the hypervisor.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                    | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f856ab63f092..5a05ff062458 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE	(1 << 12) /* Save SPE context if active  */
 #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE	(1 << 13) /* Save TRBE context if active  */
+#define KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE	(1 << 14)
 
 #define KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK (KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | \
 				 KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP | \
@@ -737,6 +738,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
 /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxsync_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 24a1e86d7128..c610971c7e72 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -850,6 +850,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 
 		kvm_arm_setup_debug(vcpu);
+		kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(vcpu);
 
 		/**************************************************************
 		 * Enter the guest
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 5621020b28de..12186c7d8cd8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -86,6 +86,14 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED;
 }
 
+void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxflush_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE))
+		vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE;
+	else
+		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE;
+}
+
 /*
  * If the guest FPSIMD state was loaded, update the host's context
  * tracking data mark the CPU FPSIMD regs as dirty and belonging to vcpu
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index c6e98c7e918b..dbd721a450d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline bool update_fp_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 * trap the accesses.
 	 */
 	if (!system_supports_fpsimd() ||
-	    vcpu->arch.host_thread_info->flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
+	    vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_FP_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
 		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED |
 				      KVM_ARM64_FP_HOST);
 
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:22PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We currently have to maintain a mapping the thread_info structure
> at EL2 in order to be able to check the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.
> 
> In order to eventually get rid of this, start with a vcpu flag that
> shadows the thread flag on each entry into the hypervisor.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:22PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We currently have to maintain a mapping the thread_info structure
> at EL2 in order to be able to check the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.
> 
> In order to eventually get rid of this, start with a vcpu flag that
> shadows the thread flag on each entry into the hypervisor.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce flag shadowing TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:22PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> We currently have to maintain a mapping the thread_info structure
> at EL2 in order to be able to check the TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE flag.
> 
> In order to eventually get rid of this, start with a vcpu flag that
> shadows the thread flag on each entry into the hypervisor.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

[PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[Marc Zyngier]

Now that we can track an equivalent of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE, drop
the mapping of current's thread_info at EL2.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  2 --
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 12 +-----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c         |  1 -
 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5a05ff062458..354b3f1b4100 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/kvm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
 
@@ -321,7 +320,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch vcpu_debug_state;
 	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
 
-	struct thread_info *host_thread_info;	/* hyp VA */
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state;	/* hyp VA */
 
 	struct {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 12186c7d8cd8..c948e5f53133 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
  */
 #include <linux/irqflags.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/thread_info.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
@@ -28,17 +27,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	struct thread_info *ti = &current->thread_info;
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd = &current->thread.uw.fpsimd_state;
 
-	/*
-	 * Make sure the host task thread flags and fpsimd state are
-	 * visible to hyp:
-	 */
-	ret = create_hyp_mappings(ti, ti + 1, PAGE_HYP);
-	if (ret)
-		goto error;
-
+	/* Make sure the host task fpsimd state is visible to hyp: */
 	ret = create_hyp_mappings(fpsimd, fpsimd + 1, PAGE_HYP);
 	if (ret)
 		goto error;
@@ -54,7 +45,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			goto error;
 	}
 
-	vcpu->arch.host_thread_info = kern_hyp_va(ti);
 	vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state = kern_hyp_va(fpsimd);
 error:
 	return ret;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index dbd721a450d3..e04561684d18 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 extern struct exception_table_entry __start___kvm_ex_table;
 extern struct exception_table_entry __stop___kvm_ex_table;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
index c0e3fed26d93..329c706af39f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 #include <nvhe/fixed_config.h>
 #include <nvhe/mem_protect.h>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 5a2cb5d9bc4b..1d162b9c78bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 /* VHE specific context */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_host_data, kvm_host_data);
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[Marc Zyngier]

Now that we can track an equivalent of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE, drop
the mapping of current's thread_info at EL2.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  2 --
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 12 +-----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c         |  1 -
 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5a05ff062458..354b3f1b4100 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/kvm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
 
@@ -321,7 +320,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch vcpu_debug_state;
 	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
 
-	struct thread_info *host_thread_info;	/* hyp VA */
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state;	/* hyp VA */
 
 	struct {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 12186c7d8cd8..c948e5f53133 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
  */
 #include <linux/irqflags.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/thread_info.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
@@ -28,17 +27,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	struct thread_info *ti = &current->thread_info;
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd = &current->thread.uw.fpsimd_state;
 
-	/*
-	 * Make sure the host task thread flags and fpsimd state are
-	 * visible to hyp:
-	 */
-	ret = create_hyp_mappings(ti, ti + 1, PAGE_HYP);
-	if (ret)
-		goto error;
-
+	/* Make sure the host task fpsimd state is visible to hyp: */
 	ret = create_hyp_mappings(fpsimd, fpsimd + 1, PAGE_HYP);
 	if (ret)
 		goto error;
@@ -54,7 +45,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			goto error;
 	}
 
-	vcpu->arch.host_thread_info = kern_hyp_va(ti);
 	vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state = kern_hyp_va(fpsimd);
 error:
 	return ret;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index dbd721a450d3..e04561684d18 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 extern struct exception_table_entry __start___kvm_ex_table;
 extern struct exception_table_entry __stop___kvm_ex_table;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
index c0e3fed26d93..329c706af39f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 #include <nvhe/fixed_config.h>
 #include <nvhe/mem_protect.h>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 5a2cb5d9bc4b..1d162b9c78bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 /* VHE specific context */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_host_data, kvm_host_data);
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm64: Stop mapping current thread_info at EL2

[Marc Zyngier]

Now that we can track an equivalent of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE, drop
the mapping of current's thread_info at EL2.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  2 --
 arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c                 | 12 +-----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c         |  1 -
 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5a05ff062458..354b3f1b4100 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/kvm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_INTC_INITIALIZED
 
@@ -321,7 +320,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch vcpu_debug_state;
 	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
 
-	struct thread_info *host_thread_info;	/* hyp VA */
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state;	/* hyp VA */
 
 	struct {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 12186c7d8cd8..c948e5f53133 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
  */
 #include <linux/irqflags.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/thread_info.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
@@ -28,17 +27,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	struct thread_info *ti = &current->thread_info;
 	struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd = &current->thread.uw.fpsimd_state;
 
-	/*
-	 * Make sure the host task thread flags and fpsimd state are
-	 * visible to hyp:
-	 */
-	ret = create_hyp_mappings(ti, ti + 1, PAGE_HYP);
-	if (ret)
-		goto error;
-
+	/* Make sure the host task fpsimd state is visible to hyp: */
 	ret = create_hyp_mappings(fpsimd, fpsimd + 1, PAGE_HYP);
 	if (ret)
 		goto error;
@@ -54,7 +45,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			goto error;
 	}
 
-	vcpu->arch.host_thread_info = kern_hyp_va(ti);
 	vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state = kern_hyp_va(fpsimd);
 error:
 	return ret;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index dbd721a450d3..e04561684d18 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 extern struct exception_table_entry __start___kvm_ex_table;
 extern struct exception_table_entry __stop___kvm_ex_table;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
index c0e3fed26d93..329c706af39f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 #include <nvhe/fixed_config.h>
 #include <nvhe/mem_protect.h>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 5a2cb5d9bc4b..1d162b9c78bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
 #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 /* VHE specific context */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_host_data, kvm_host_data);
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

[PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Marc Zyngier]

The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.

Try and document this for the posterity.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index ff4962750b3d..65af2ed64c6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -78,7 +78,10 @@
  * indicate whether or not the userland FPSIMD state of the current task is
  * present in the registers. The flag is set unless the FPSIMD registers of this
  * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
- * task.
+ * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
+ * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
+ * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
+ * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.
  *
  * In order to allow softirq handlers to use FPSIMD, kernel_neon_begin() may
  * save the task's FPSIMD context back to task_struct from softirq context.
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Marc Zyngier]

The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.

Try and document this for the posterity.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index ff4962750b3d..65af2ed64c6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -78,7 +78,10 @@
  * indicate whether or not the userland FPSIMD state of the current task is
  * present in the registers. The flag is set unless the FPSIMD registers of this
  * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
- * task.
+ * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
+ * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
+ * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
+ * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.
  *
  * In order to allow softirq handlers to use FPSIMD, kernel_neon_begin() may
  * save the task's FPSIMD context back to task_struct from softirq context.
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Marc Zyngier]

The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.

Try and document this for the posterity.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index ff4962750b3d..65af2ed64c6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -78,7 +78,10 @@
  * indicate whether or not the userland FPSIMD state of the current task is
  * present in the registers. The flag is set unless the FPSIMD registers of this
  * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
- * task.
+ * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
+ * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
+ * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
+ * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.
  *
  * In order to allow softirq handlers to use FPSIMD, kernel_neon_begin() may
  * save the task's FPSIMD context back to task_struct from softirq context.
-- 
2.30.2

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1924 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
> does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.
> 
> Try and document this for the posterity.

Yes, more documentation here would definitely be helpful - it's pretty
hard to follow what KVM is doing here.

>   * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
> - * task.
> + * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
> + * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
> + * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
> + * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.

I'm not able to find a kvm_vcpu_put() function in upstream, just
kvm_cpu_put_sysregs_vhe().  There's kvm_arch_vcpu_put() which is called
from the vcpu_put() function in generic KVM code but they don't show up
until you start mangling the name in that comment.  It'd be good to
mention what vcpu_put() is actually doing and a bit more about the
general model, KVM is behaving differently here AFAICT in that it flags
the current state as invalid when it saves the context to memory rather
than when an event happens that requires that the context be reloaded.
There's no problem there but it's a bit surprising due the difference
and worth highlighting.

I think I'd also be inclined to restructure this to foreground the fact
that it's the state of the current task but that task may be a VMM.  So
something more like

	...contain the most recent FPSIMD state of the current userspace
	task.  If the task is behaving as a VMM then this will be
	managed by KVM which will...

making it a bit easier to follow (assuming my understanding of what's
going on is correct, if not then I guess something else needs
clarifying!).

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1924 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
> does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.
> 
> Try and document this for the posterity.

Yes, more documentation here would definitely be helpful - it's pretty
hard to follow what KVM is doing here.

>   * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
> - * task.
> + * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
> + * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
> + * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
> + * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.

I'm not able to find a kvm_vcpu_put() function in upstream, just
kvm_cpu_put_sysregs_vhe().  There's kvm_arch_vcpu_put() which is called
from the vcpu_put() function in generic KVM code but they don't show up
until you start mangling the name in that comment.  It'd be good to
mention what vcpu_put() is actually doing and a bit more about the
general model, KVM is behaving differently here AFAICT in that it flags
the current state as invalid when it saves the context to memory rather
than when an event happens that requires that the context be reloaded.
There's no problem there but it's a bit surprising due the difference
and worth highlighting.

I think I'd also be inclined to restructure this to foreground the fact
that it's the state of the current task but that task may be a VMM.  So
something more like

	...contain the most recent FPSIMD state of the current userspace
	task.  If the task is behaving as a VMM then this will be
	managed by KVM which will...

making it a bit easier to follow (assuming my understanding of what's
going on is correct, if not then I guess something else needs
clarifying!).

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1924 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
> does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.
> 
> Try and document this for the posterity.

Yes, more documentation here would definitely be helpful - it's pretty
hard to follow what KVM is doing here.

>   * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
> - * task.
> + * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
> + * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
> + * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
> + * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.

I'm not able to find a kvm_vcpu_put() function in upstream, just
kvm_cpu_put_sysregs_vhe().  There's kvm_arch_vcpu_put() which is called
from the vcpu_put() function in generic KVM code but they don't show up
until you start mangling the name in that comment.  It'd be good to
mention what vcpu_put() is actually doing and a bit more about the
general model, KVM is behaving differently here AFAICT in that it flags
the current state as invalid when it saves the context to memory rather
than when an event happens that requires that the context be reloaded.
There's no problem there but it's a bit surprising due the difference
and worth highlighting.

I think I'd also be inclined to restructure this to foreground the fact
that it's the state of the current task but that task may be a VMM.  So
something more like

	...contain the most recent FPSIMD state of the current userspace
	task.  If the task is behaving as a VMM then this will be
	managed by KVM which will...

making it a bit easier to follow (assuming my understanding of what's
going on is correct, if not then I guess something else needs
clarifying!).

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:57:15 +0100,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
> > does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.
> > 
> > Try and document this for the posterity.
> 
> Yes, more documentation here would definitely be helpful - it's pretty
> hard to follow what KVM is doing here.
> 
> >   * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
> > - * task.
> > + * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
> > + * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
> > + * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
> > + * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.
> 
> I'm not able to find a kvm_vcpu_put() function in upstream, just
> kvm_cpu_put_sysregs_vhe().  There's kvm_arch_vcpu_put() which is called
> from the vcpu_put() function in generic KVM code but they don't show up
> until you start mangling the name in that comment.

You, vcpu_put() is the one I had in mind.

> It'd be good to
> mention what vcpu_put() is actually doing and a bit more about the
> general model, KVM is behaving differently here AFAICT in that it flags
> the current state as invalid when it saves the context to memory rather
> than when an event happens that requires that the context be reloaded.
> There's no problem there but it's a bit surprising due the difference
> and worth highlighting.

There is a bit more to it: KVM flags the userspace state as invalid,
but also ties the guest state to the current task via
fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu() so that the state can be saved on
vcpu_put() via fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state(), or if we end-up
running kernel_neon_begin() because of some softirq handling.

> I think I'd also be inclined to restructure this to foreground the fact
> that it's the state of the current task but that task may be a VMM.  So
> something more like
> 
> 	...contain the most recent FPSIMD state of the current userspace
> 	task.  If the task is behaving as a VMM then this will be
> 	managed by KVM which will...
> 
> making it a bit easier to follow (assuming my understanding of what's
> going on is correct, if not then I guess something else needs
> clarifying!).

I'll have a go at rewriting this.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:57:15 +0100,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
> > does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.
> > 
> > Try and document this for the posterity.
> 
> Yes, more documentation here would definitely be helpful - it's pretty
> hard to follow what KVM is doing here.
> 
> >   * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
> > - * task.
> > + * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
> > + * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
> > + * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
> > + * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.
> 
> I'm not able to find a kvm_vcpu_put() function in upstream, just
> kvm_cpu_put_sysregs_vhe().  There's kvm_arch_vcpu_put() which is called
> from the vcpu_put() function in generic KVM code but they don't show up
> until you start mangling the name in that comment.

You, vcpu_put() is the one I had in mind.

> It'd be good to
> mention what vcpu_put() is actually doing and a bit more about the
> general model, KVM is behaving differently here AFAICT in that it flags
> the current state as invalid when it saves the context to memory rather
> than when an event happens that requires that the context be reloaded.
> There's no problem there but it's a bit surprising due the difference
> and worth highlighting.

There is a bit more to it: KVM flags the userspace state as invalid,
but also ties the guest state to the current task via
fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu() so that the state can be saved on
vcpu_put() via fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state(), or if we end-up
running kernel_neon_begin() because of some softirq handling.

> I think I'd also be inclined to restructure this to foreground the fact
> that it's the state of the current task but that task may be a VMM.  So
> something more like
> 
> 	...contain the most recent FPSIMD state of the current userspace
> 	task.  If the task is behaving as a VMM then this will be
> 	managed by KVM which will...
> 
> making it a bit easier to follow (assuming my understanding of what's
> going on is correct, if not then I guess something else needs
> clarifying!).

I'll have a go at rewriting this.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64/fpsimd: Document the use of TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE by KVM

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:57:15 +0100,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:11:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The bit of documentation that talks about TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE
> > does not mention the ungodly tricks that KVM plays with this flag.
> > 
> > Try and document this for the posterity.
> 
> Yes, more documentation here would definitely be helpful - it's pretty
> hard to follow what KVM is doing here.
> 
> >   * CPU currently contain the most recent userland FPSIMD state of the current
> > - * task.
> > + * task *or* the state of the corresponding KVM vcpu if userspace is behaving
> > + * as a VMM and that the vcpu has used FP during its last run. In the latter
> > + * case, KVM will set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on kvm_vcpu_put(). For all intents
> > + * and purposes, the vcpu FP state is treated identically to userspace's.
> 
> I'm not able to find a kvm_vcpu_put() function in upstream, just
> kvm_cpu_put_sysregs_vhe().  There's kvm_arch_vcpu_put() which is called
> from the vcpu_put() function in generic KVM code but they don't show up
> until you start mangling the name in that comment.

You, vcpu_put() is the one I had in mind.

> It'd be good to
> mention what vcpu_put() is actually doing and a bit more about the
> general model, KVM is behaving differently here AFAICT in that it flags
> the current state as invalid when it saves the context to memory rather
> than when an event happens that requires that the context be reloaded.
> There's no problem there but it's a bit surprising due the difference
> and worth highlighting.

There is a bit more to it: KVM flags the userspace state as invalid,
but also ties the guest state to the current task via
fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu() so that the state can be saved on
vcpu_put() via fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state(), or if we end-up
running kernel_neon_begin() because of some softirq handling.

> I think I'd also be inclined to restructure this to foreground the fact
> that it's the state of the current task but that task may be a VMM.  So
> something more like
> 
> 	...contain the most recent FPSIMD state of the current userspace
> 	task.  If the task is behaving as a VMM then this will be
> 	managed by KVM which will...
> 
> making it a bit easier to follow (assuming my understanding of what's
> going on is correct, if not then I guess something else needs
> clarifying!).

I'll have a go at rewriting this.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm