All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:11:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735sabj0l.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2-v1-eaf3ccbba33c+1add0-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>
> This pairs with vfio_init_group_dev() and allows undoing any state that is
> stored in the vfio_device unrelated to registration. Add appropriately
> placed calls to all the drivers.
>
> The following patch will use this to add pre-registration state for the
> device set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst            |  4 ++-
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c            |  6 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                | 13 +++++++---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                  |  6 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c |  7 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                          |  5 ++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h                         |  1 +
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                   |  2 ++
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                     | 25 ++++++++++--------
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                     | 27 ++++++++++++--------
>  10 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

(...)

> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> index e81b875b4d87b4..cf264d0bf11053 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> @@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_mem:
> +	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -571,6 +572,7 @@ static void mbochs_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  	vfio_unregister_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
> +	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);

Does the location of the uninit vs the kfree matter? Even if not, it
might be good to keep it consistent.

>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  }
>  


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:11:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735sabj0l.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2-v1-eaf3ccbba33c+1add0-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>
> This pairs with vfio_init_group_dev() and allows undoing any state that is
> stored in the vfio_device unrelated to registration. Add appropriately
> placed calls to all the drivers.
>
> The following patch will use this to add pre-registration state for the
> device set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst            |  4 ++-
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c            |  6 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                | 13 +++++++---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                  |  6 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c |  7 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                          |  5 ++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h                         |  1 +
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                   |  2 ++
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                     | 25 ++++++++++--------
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                     | 27 ++++++++++++--------
>  10 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

(...)

> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> index e81b875b4d87b4..cf264d0bf11053 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> @@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_mem:
> +	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -571,6 +572,7 @@ static void mbochs_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  	vfio_unregister_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
> +	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);

Does the location of the uninit vs the kfree matter? Even if not, it
might be good to keep it consistent.

>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  }
>  


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:11:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735sabj0l.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2-v1-eaf3ccbba33c+1add0-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
>
> This pairs with vfio_init_group_dev() and allows undoing any state that is
> stored in the vfio_device unrelated to registration. Add appropriately
> placed calls to all the drivers.
>
> The following patch will use this to add pre-registration state for the
> device set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst            |  4 ++-
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c            |  6 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                | 13 +++++++---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                  |  6 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c |  7 +++--
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                          |  5 ++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h                         |  1 +
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                   |  2 ++
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                     | 25 ++++++++++--------
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                     | 27 ++++++++++++--------
>  10 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

(...)

> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> index e81b875b4d87b4..cf264d0bf11053 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
> @@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_mem:
> +	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -571,6 +572,7 @@ static void mbochs_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>  	vfio_unregister_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->pages);
>  	kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
> +	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);

Does the location of the uninit vs the kfree matter? Even if not, it
might be good to keep it consistent.

>  	kfree(mdev_state);
>  }
>  

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-15  0:20 [PATCH 00/13] Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] vfio/samples: Remove module get/put Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 11:42   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 11:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 11:42     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 02/13] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  3:49   ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-15  3:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-15  3:49     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-15 12:45     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 12:45       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 12:45       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 12:11   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-07-19 12:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 12:11     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 12:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 12:17       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 12:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 12:43       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 12:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 12:43         ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 12:58   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 12:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 12:58     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 13:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 13:01       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 13:01       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 13:03       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 13:03         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 13:03         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 04/13] vfio/samples: Delete useless open/close Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 13:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 13:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 13:01     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 05/13] vfio/fsl: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 16:12   ` Diana Craciun OSS
2021-07-20 16:12     ` [Intel-gfx] " Diana Craciun OSS
2021-07-20 16:12     ` Diana Craciun OSS
2021-07-20 16:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 16:17       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 16:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 16:23       ` Diana Craciun OSS
2021-07-20 16:23         ` [Intel-gfx] " Diana Craciun OSS
2021-07-20 16:23         ` Diana Craciun OSS
2021-07-20 16:25         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 16:25           ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 16:25           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 06/13] vfio/platform: Use open_device() instead of open coding a refcnt scheme Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 07/13] vfio/pci: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] vfio/pci: Change vfio_pci_try_bus_reset() to use the dev_set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 09/13] vfio/pci: Reorganize VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET to use the device set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 21:00   ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-15 21:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-07-15 21:00     ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-15 22:11     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 22:11       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 22:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 22:27       ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-15 22:27         ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-07-15 22:27         ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 10/13] vfio/mbochs: Fix close when multiple device FDs are open Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 14:45   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 14:45     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 14:45     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 11/13] vfio/ap,ccw: Fix open/close " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] vfio/ap, ccw: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-19 14:40   ` [PATCH 11/13] vfio/ap,ccw: " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 14:40     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] vfio/ap, ccw: " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 14:40     ` [PATCH 11/13] vfio/ap,ccw: " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 12/13] vfio/gvt: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-16  6:50   ` Zhenyu Wang
2021-07-16  6:50     ` [Intel-gfx] " Zhenyu Wang
2021-07-16  6:50     ` Zhenyu Wang
2021-07-19 14:47   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 14:47     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-19 14:47     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-15  0:20 ` [PATCH 13/13] vfio: Remove struct vfio_device_ops open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15  0:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 13:28 ` [PATCH 00/13] Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release Kirti Wankhede
2021-07-15 13:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirti Wankhede
2021-07-15 13:28   ` Kirti Wankhede
2021-07-15 14:55   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 14:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-15 14:55     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-16 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-16 17:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-16 22:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-20 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8735sabj0l.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.