From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>,
kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 11:45:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875ypxgqu3.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAASaF6xQG691q9JxiEF5HgqCNfGd1FHhwEX5TG_WpW3rHpBFKQ@mail.gmail.com> (Jan Stancek's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:26 +0100")
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:49 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Looks like we have a regression.
>
> agreed, "abort" option stopped working:
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/issues/945
>
> Lukas pointed out this patch that didn't make it in yet:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/21/384
> This should be new version:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YcSYvk5DdGjjB9q%2F@mit.edu/T/#t
I gave this patch a try and verified it fixes the test case regression.
Let me ask Ted to make sure it is merged for the 5.17 release.
Thanks,
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 11:45:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875ypxgqu3.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAASaF6xQG691q9JxiEF5HgqCNfGd1FHhwEX5TG_WpW3rHpBFKQ@mail.gmail.com> (Jan Stancek's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:26 +0100")
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:49 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Looks like we have a regression.
>
> agreed, "abort" option stopped working:
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/issues/945
>
> Lukas pointed out this patch that didn't make it in yet:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/21/384
> This should be new version:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YcSYvk5DdGjjB9q%2F@mit.edu/T/#t
I gave this patch a try and verified it fixes the test case regression.
Let me ask Ted to make sure it is merged for the 5.17 release.
Thanks,
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 23:57 [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific mark types Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific events Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Introduce FAN_FS_ERROR test Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Validate the generic error info Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-19 5:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-19 5:38 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-11-19 19:29 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-19 19:29 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-11-19 22:39 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-19 22:39 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Support submission of debugfs commands Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Create a corrupted file Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Test file event with broken inode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Test capture of multiple errors Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-19 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Amir Goldstein
2021-11-19 5:48 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-11-19 19:29 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-19 19:29 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-20 10:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-11-20 10:43 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-11-22 7:47 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-22 7:47 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-11-22 17:35 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-22 17:35 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-22 21:09 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-22 21:09 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2021-11-24 10:39 ` Petr Vorel
2021-11-24 10:39 ` Petr Vorel
2021-12-20 11:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-12-20 11:48 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-12-20 18:07 ` Petr Vorel
2021-12-20 18:07 ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-10 15:16 ` Petr Vorel
2022-01-10 15:16 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2022-02-02 13:49 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-02-02 13:49 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2022-02-02 14:10 ` Jan Stancek
2022-02-02 14:10 ` Jan Stancek
2022-02-02 16:45 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2022-02-02 16:45 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2022-02-02 14:22 ` Petr Vorel
2022-02-02 14:22 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2022-02-02 16:13 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-02-02 16:13 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-02-02 16:57 ` Petr Vorel
2022-02-02 16:57 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875ypxgqu3.fsf@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=repnop@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.