All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: pwm: reject legacy pwm request for device defined in dt
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:21:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878u775dkv.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561BD282.70305@mentor.com> (Vladimir Zapolskiy's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:32:18 +0300")

Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> writes:

> Robert,
>
> because you found a regression in the related area of code on a
> platform, which uses legacy PWM API, could you please confirm that three
> patches applied in a row don't break anything for you, the changes are:
>
> * Nicolas' 68feaca0b1 ("backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while
> requesting the PWM")
> * Thierry' https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/5/319
> * and this one is the last in the series:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2813
I confirm, my backlight works again with it :
Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] backlight: pwm: reject legacy pwm request for device defined in dt
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:21:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878u775dkv.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561BD282.70305@mentor.com> (Vladimir Zapolskiy's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:32:18 +0300")

Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> writes:

> Robert,
>
> because you found a regression in the related area of code on a
> platform, which uses legacy PWM API, could you please confirm that three
> patches applied in a row don't break anything for you, the changes are:
>
> * Nicolas' 68feaca0b1 ("backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while
> requesting the PWM")
> * Thierry' https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/5/319
> * and this one is the last in the series:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2813
I confirm, my backlight works again with it :
Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-13  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12 12:29 [PATCH v2] backlight: pwm: reject legacy pwm request for device defined in dt Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 12:29 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 13:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-12 13:16   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-12 13:30   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 13:30     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 13:54     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 13:54       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 14:06       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 14:06         ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 14:19         ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 14:19           ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 15:19           ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 15:19             ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 15:32             ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 15:32               ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 17:11               ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-12 17:11                 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-13  7:29               ` Lee Jones
2015-10-13  7:29                 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-15 10:45                 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-15 10:45                   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-13  9:21               ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2015-10-13  9:21                 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-15 11:03 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-15 11:03   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878u775dkv.fsf@belgarion.home \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.