From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> To: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Cc: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix htt t2h message conflicts among firmware revisions Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:27:52 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <878uetl7cn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1426066382-481-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> (Rajkumar Manoharan's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:03:02 +0530") Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> writes: > Target to host HTT messages are conflicting between 10.x and other > firmware revisions. By maintaining separate HTT T2H tables for each > firmware revisions (main, 10x and tlv) similar to WMI abstraction, > solves the conflicts. > > Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> So this is needed to get managements frames over HTT working, right? It's good to mention that in the commit log, does this look ok: Author: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed Mar 11 15:03:02 2015 +0530 ath10k: fix htt t2h message conflicts among firmware revisions Target to host HTT messages are conflicting between 10.x and other firmware revisions. By maintaining separate HTT T2H tables for each firmware revisions (main, 10x and tlv) similar to WMI abstraction, solves the conflicts. This fix is needed to get management frames over HTT (ie. ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX disabled) working with 10.2.4.48-2 firmware. Otherwise there will be unknown htt events and nothing works: [30087.438343] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: htt event (19) not handled [30087.448691] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: htt event (19) not handled [30149.032974] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: htt event (19) not handled Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> > @@ -66,6 +146,26 @@ int ath10k_htt_init(struct ath10k *ar) > 8 + /* llc snap */ > 2; /* ip4 dscp or ip6 priority */ > > + switch (ar->wmi.op_version) { > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_MAIN: > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types = htt_main_t2h_msg_types; > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types_max = HTT_MAIN_T2H_NUM_MSGS; > + break; > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_1: > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_2: > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_2_4: > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types = htt_10x_t2h_msg_types; > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types_max = HTT_10X_T2H_NUM_MSGS; > + break; > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_TLV: > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types = htt_tlv_t2h_msg_types; > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types_max = HTT_TLV_T2H_NUM_MSGS; > + break; > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_UNSET: > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_MAX: > + WARN_ON(1); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > return 0; When I was adding WMI_OP_VERSION, my idea was that we will add similar version for HTT as well once we need it. But I guess this is good enough for now, we can add HTT_OP_VERSION later if more changes are needed. -- Kalle Valo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> To: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix htt t2h message conflicts among firmware revisions Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:27:52 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <878uetl7cn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1426066382-481-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> (Rajkumar Manoharan's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:03:02 +0530") Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> writes: > Target to host HTT messages are conflicting between 10.x and other > firmware revisions. By maintaining separate HTT T2H tables for each > firmware revisions (main, 10x and tlv) similar to WMI abstraction, > solves the conflicts. > > Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> So this is needed to get managements frames over HTT working, right? It's good to mention that in the commit log, does this look ok: Author: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed Mar 11 15:03:02 2015 +0530 ath10k: fix htt t2h message conflicts among firmware revisions Target to host HTT messages are conflicting between 10.x and other firmware revisions. By maintaining separate HTT T2H tables for each firmware revisions (main, 10x and tlv) similar to WMI abstraction, solves the conflicts. This fix is needed to get management frames over HTT (ie. ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX disabled) working with 10.2.4.48-2 firmware. Otherwise there will be unknown htt events and nothing works: [30087.438343] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: htt event (19) not handled [30087.448691] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: htt event (19) not handled [30149.032974] ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: htt event (19) not handled Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> > @@ -66,6 +146,26 @@ int ath10k_htt_init(struct ath10k *ar) > 8 + /* llc snap */ > 2; /* ip4 dscp or ip6 priority */ > > + switch (ar->wmi.op_version) { > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_MAIN: > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types = htt_main_t2h_msg_types; > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types_max = HTT_MAIN_T2H_NUM_MSGS; > + break; > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_1: > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_2: > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_10_2_4: > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types = htt_10x_t2h_msg_types; > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types_max = HTT_10X_T2H_NUM_MSGS; > + break; > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_TLV: > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types = htt_tlv_t2h_msg_types; > + ar->htt.t2h_msg_types_max = HTT_TLV_T2H_NUM_MSGS; > + break; > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_UNSET: > + case ATH10K_FW_WMI_OP_VERSION_MAX: > + WARN_ON(1); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > return 0; When I was adding WMI_OP_VERSION, my idea was that we will add similar version for HTT as well once we need it. But I guess this is good enough for now, we can add HTT_OP_VERSION later if more changes are needed. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 8:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-03-11 9:33 [PATCH] ath10k: fix htt t2h message conflicts among firmware revisions Rajkumar Manoharan 2015-03-11 9:33 ` Rajkumar Manoharan 2015-03-19 8:27 ` Kalle Valo [this message] 2015-03-19 8:27 ` Kalle Valo 2015-03-19 8:40 ` Michal Kazior 2015-03-19 8:40 ` Michal Kazior 2015-03-19 9:32 ` Kalle Valo 2015-03-19 9:32 ` Kalle Valo 2015-03-19 10:14 ` Michal Kazior 2015-03-19 10:14 ` Michal Kazior
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=878uetl7cn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \ --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \ --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \ --cc=rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.