From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> To: "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@ti.com> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup iclk usage Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:34:30 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <878vhmezmx.fsf@ti.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAC83ZvKrV6yjwj9BoU662p8MRbB-h2JGE6AS3eGgaPy8+z=J7w@mail.gmail.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:06:59 +0530") "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote: >> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes: >> >>> We do not use iclk anywhere in the dmtimer driver and so removing it. >>> Hence removing the timer iclk entries from OMAP4 clkdev table as well. >> >> What about the OMAP2/3 clkdev tables? Can't those be removed as well? > No, they are being used. In fact I removed them in the beginning only > to discover they are needed. Maybe PATCH 0/x could summarize why they're still needed for OMAP2/3. >> >> Comment applies to PATCH 4/4 also. > You mean removing iclk from clkdev table? That is already done in this patch!! I meant why can't OMAP2/3 data be removed in PATCH 4/4 also, which only touches OMAP4. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup iclk usage Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:34:30 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <878vhmezmx.fsf@ti.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAC83ZvKrV6yjwj9BoU662p8MRbB-h2JGE6AS3eGgaPy8+z=J7w@mail.gmail.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:06:59 +0530") "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote: >> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes: >> >>> We do not use iclk anywhere in the dmtimer driver and so removing it. >>> Hence removing the timer iclk entries from OMAP4 clkdev table as well. >> >> What about the OMAP2/3 clkdev tables? ?Can't those be removed as well? > No, they are being used. In fact I removed them in the beginning only > to discover they are needed. Maybe PATCH 0/x could summarize why they're still needed for OMAP2/3. >> >> Comment applies to PATCH 4/4 also. > You mean removing iclk from clkdev table? That is already done in this patch!! I meant why can't OMAP2/3 data be removed in PATCH 4/4 also, which only touches OMAP4. Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 0:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-04-20 12:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup related to devm API and clk usage Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: use devm_ API and do some cleanup in probe() Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: add omap_hwmod_get_main_clk() API Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 15:10 ` Cousson, Benoit 2012-04-20 15:10 ` Cousson, Benoit 2012-06-18 16:23 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-06-18 16:23 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-04 15:39 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-07-04 15:39 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-04-20 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup iclk usage Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-23 17:48 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-04-23 17:48 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-04-23 19:36 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-04-23 19:36 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-04-24 0:34 ` Kevin Hilman [this message] 2012-04-24 0:34 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-04-20 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup fclk usage Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-04-20 12:39 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma 2012-06-14 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP2+: dmtimer: cleanup related to devm API and clk usage DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-06-14 10:54 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-06-14 10:58 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-06-14 10:58 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-05 4:02 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-07-05 4:02 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-07-05 9:28 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-07-05 9:28 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-07-05 11:41 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-07-05 11:41 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti 2012-07-06 7:09 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-07-06 7:09 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=878vhmezmx.fsf@ti.com \ --to=khilman@ti.com \ --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=paul@pwsan.com \ --cc=rnayak@ti.com \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ --cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.