All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] arm64: kvm: Fix symbol dependency in __hyp_call_panic_nvhe
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 14:22:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blmzj2w5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430144831.59194-4-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:48:19 +0100,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
> 
> __hyp_call_panic_nvhe contains inline assembly which did not declare
> its dependency on the __hyp_panic_string symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 8a1e81a400e0..7a7c08029d81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_nvhe(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
>  	 * making sure it is a kernel address and not a PC-relative
>  	 * reference.
>  	 */
> -	asm volatile("ldr %0, =__hyp_panic_string" : "=r" (str_va));
> +	asm volatile("ldr %0, =%1" : "=r" (str_va) : "S" (__hyp_panic_string));
>  
>  	__hyp_do_panic(str_va,
>  		       spsr, elr,
> -- 
> 2.26.1
> 
> 

What breaks without this constraint? Is it a fix that should go in
early? Otherwise looks good.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] arm64: kvm: Fix symbol dependency in __hyp_call_panic_nvhe
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 14:22:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blmzj2w5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430144831.59194-4-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:48:19 +0100,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
> 
> __hyp_call_panic_nvhe contains inline assembly which did not declare
> its dependency on the __hyp_panic_string symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 8a1e81a400e0..7a7c08029d81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_nvhe(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
>  	 * making sure it is a kernel address and not a PC-relative
>  	 * reference.
>  	 */
> -	asm volatile("ldr %0, =__hyp_panic_string" : "=r" (str_va));
> +	asm volatile("ldr %0, =%1" : "=r" (str_va) : "S" (__hyp_panic_string));
>  
>  	__hyp_do_panic(str_va,
>  		       spsr, elr,
> -- 
> 2.26.1
> 
> 

What breaks without this constraint? Is it a fix that should go in
early? Otherwise looks good.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] arm64: kvm: Fix symbol dependency in __hyp_call_panic_nvhe
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 14:22:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blmzj2w5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430144831.59194-4-dbrazdil@google.com>

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:48:19 +0100,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com> wrote:
> 
> __hyp_call_panic_nvhe contains inline assembly which did not declare
> its dependency on the __hyp_panic_string symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 8a1e81a400e0..7a7c08029d81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_nvhe(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
>  	 * making sure it is a kernel address and not a PC-relative
>  	 * reference.
>  	 */
> -	asm volatile("ldr %0, =__hyp_panic_string" : "=r" (str_va));
> +	asm volatile("ldr %0, =%1" : "=r" (str_va) : "S" (__hyp_panic_string));
>  
>  	__hyp_do_panic(str_va,
>  		       spsr, elr,
> -- 
> 2.26.1
> 
> 

What breaks without this constraint? Is it a fix that should go in
early? Otherwise looks good.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-30 14:48 [PATCH 00/15] Split off nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 01/15] arm64: kvm: Unify users of HVC instruction David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 14:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 14:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 14:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 14:36     ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-07 14:36       ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-07 14:36       ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-13 10:30       ` David Brazdil
2020-05-13 10:30         ` David Brazdil
2020-05-13 10:30         ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] arm64: kvm: Formalize host-hyp hypcall ABI David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 13:10   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 13:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 13:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 13:33     ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-07 13:33       ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-07 13:33       ` Quentin Perret
2020-05-10 10:16       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-10 10:16         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-10 10:16         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-13 10:48         ` David Brazdil
2020-05-13 10:48           ` David Brazdil
2020-05-13 10:48           ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm64: kvm: Fix symbol dependency in __hyp_call_panic_nvhe David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 13:22   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-05-07 13:22     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 13:22     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 14:36     ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 14:36       ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 14:36       ` David Brazdil
2020-05-10 11:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-10 11:14         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-10 11:14         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 04/15] arm64: kvm: Add build rules for separate nVHE object files David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 13:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 13:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 13:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 05/15] arm64: kvm: Build hyp-entry.S separately for VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-05-07 15:07   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 15:07     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 15:07     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 15:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 15:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-07 15:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 06/15] arm64: kvm: Move __smccc_workaround_1_smc to .rodata David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-05-11 10:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-11 10:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-11 10:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-11 10:29     ` Will Deacon
2020-05-11 10:29       ` Will Deacon
2020-05-11 10:29       ` Will Deacon
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 07/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/tlb.c to VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 08/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/switch.c " David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 09/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/debug-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 10/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/sysreg-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 11/15] arm64: kvm: Split hyp/timer-sr.c " David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 12/15] arm64: kvm: Compile remaining hyp/ files for both VHE/nVHE David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 13/15] arm64: kvm: Add comments around __hyp_text_ symbol aliases David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 14/15] arm64: kvm: Remove __hyp_text macro, use build rules instead David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48 ` [PATCH 15/15] arm64: kvm: Lift instrumentation restrictions on VHE David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 14:48   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 17:53 ` [PATCH 00/15] Split off nVHE hyp code Marc Zyngier
2020-04-30 17:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-30 17:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-30 18:57   ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 18:57     ` David Brazdil
2020-04-30 18:57     ` David Brazdil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87blmzj2w5.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.