From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Avoid expensive cpu_suspend() path for all CPU power states except off Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:19:17 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87d2wazep6.fsf@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1360336306-18277-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:41:46 +0530") Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes: > Current CPU PM code code make use of common cpu_suspend() path for all the > CPU power states which is not optimal. In fact cpu_suspend() path is needed > only when we put CPU power domain to off state where the CPU context is lost. > > Update the code accordingly so that the expensive cpu_suspend() path > can be avoided for the shallow CPU power states like CPU PD INA/CSWR. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> > > Reported-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Looks OK at first glance, but are you sure this is right for the various ways both clusters might idle using coupled CPUidle? Some description of the testing would be helpful here. Thanks, Kevin > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c > index aac46bf..abdd0f6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c > @@ -276,7 +276,10 @@ int omap4_enter_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) > /* > * Call low level function with targeted low power state. > */ > - cpu_suspend(save_state, omap4_finish_suspend); > + if (save_state) > + cpu_suspend(save_state, omap4_finish_suspend); > + else > + omap4_finish_suspend(save_state); > > /* > * Restore the CPUx power state to ON otherwise CPUx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Avoid expensive cpu_suspend() path for all CPU power states except off Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:19:17 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87d2wazep6.fsf@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1360336306-18277-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:41:46 +0530") Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes: > Current CPU PM code code make use of common cpu_suspend() path for all the > CPU power states which is not optimal. In fact cpu_suspend() path is needed > only when we put CPU power domain to off state where the CPU context is lost. > > Update the code accordingly so that the expensive cpu_suspend() path > can be avoided for the shallow CPU power states like CPU PD INA/CSWR. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> > > Reported-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Looks OK at first glance, but are you sure this is right for the various ways both clusters might idle using coupled CPUidle? Some description of the testing would be helpful here. Thanks, Kevin > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c > index aac46bf..abdd0f6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c > @@ -276,7 +276,10 @@ int omap4_enter_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state) > /* > * Call low level function with targeted low power state. > */ > - cpu_suspend(save_state, omap4_finish_suspend); > + if (save_state) > + cpu_suspend(save_state, omap4_finish_suspend); > + else > + omap4_finish_suspend(save_state); > > /* > * Restore the CPUx power state to ON otherwise CPUx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-08 21:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-02-08 15:11 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Fix the dt return condition in pm_late_init() Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:11 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove duplicate omap4430_init_late() declaration Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:21 ` Felipe Balbi 2013-02-08 15:21 ` Felipe Balbi 2013-02-15 9:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-15 9:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-03-04 18:19 ` Tony Lindgren 2013-03-04 18:19 ` Tony Lindgren 2013-02-08 15:11 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Avoid expensive cpu_suspend() path for all CPU power states except off Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:26 ` Felipe Balbi 2013-02-08 15:26 ` Felipe Balbi 2013-02-08 15:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 21:19 ` Kevin Hilman [this message] 2013-02-08 21:19 ` Kevin Hilman 2013-02-12 4:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-12 4:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-12 15:18 ` Kevin Hilman 2013-02-12 15:18 ` Kevin Hilman 2013-02-13 5:05 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-13 5:05 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:20 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Fix the dt return condition in pm_late_init() Felipe Balbi 2013-02-08 15:20 ` Felipe Balbi 2013-02-08 15:34 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-02-08 15:34 ` Paul Walmsley 2013-02-08 15:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2013-02-08 15:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87d2wazep6.fsf@linaro.org \ --to=khilman@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.