All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
	Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] aarch64: avoid mprotect(PROT_BTI|PROT_EXEC) [BZ #26831]
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:45:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ft5p2naf.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104144120.GD28902@gaia> (Catalin Marinas's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:41:21 +0000")

* Catalin Marinas:

> Can the dynamic loader mmap() the main exe again while munmap'ing the
> original one? (sorry if it was already discussed)

No, we don't have a descriptor for that.  /proc may not be mounted, and
using the path stored there has a race condition anyway.

Thanks,
Florian
-- 
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] aarch64: avoid mprotect(PROT_BTI|PROT_EXEC) [BZ #26831]
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:45:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ft5p2naf.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104144120.GD28902@gaia> (Catalin Marinas's message of "Wed,  4 Nov 2020 14:41:21 +0000")

* Catalin Marinas:

> Can the dynamic loader mmap() the main exe again while munmap'ing the
> original one? (sorry if it was already discussed)

No, we don't have a descriptor for that.  /proc may not be mounted, and
using the path stored there has a race condition anyway.

Thanks,
Florian
-- 
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-04 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 10:25 [PATCH 0/4] aarch64: avoid mprotect(PROT_BTI|PROT_EXEC) [BZ #26831] Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] elf: Pass the fd to note processing " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:25   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] elf: Move note processing after l_phdr is updated " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:38   ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:38     ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:38     ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 12:36     ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 12:36       ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 12:36       ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 15:04       ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 15:04         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 15:27         ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 15:27           ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 15:27           ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Use mmap to add PROT_BTI instead of mprotect " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:34   ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:34     ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:34     ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Remove the bti link_map field " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 17:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] aarch64: avoid mprotect(PROT_BTI|PROT_EXEC) " Mark Brown
2020-11-03 17:34   ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04  5:41   ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04  5:41     ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04  8:57     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04  8:57       ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 14:41       ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 14:41         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 14:45         ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-11-04 14:45           ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 14:45           ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 10:50     ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 10:50       ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 18:47       ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 18:47         ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 18:53         ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 18:53           ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04  9:02   ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04  9:02     ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04  9:20   ` Will Deacon
2020-11-04  9:20     ` Will Deacon
2020-11-04  9:29     ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04  9:29       ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04  9:29       ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04  9:55       ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04  9:55         ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 14:35         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 14:35           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 15:19           ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 15:19             ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 16:08             ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 16:08               ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 15:20         ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-04 15:20           ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-04 18:59           ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 18:59             ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-05 11:31     ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-05 11:31       ` Szabolcs Nagy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ft5p2naf.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=s.mesoraca16@gmail.com \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=toiwoton@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.