All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:32:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftexsngy.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225171125.28885-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Make life a bit simpler by sticking a sentinel at the end of
> the dbuf slice arrays. This way we don't need to pass in the
> size. Also unify the types (u8 vs. u32) for active_pipes.
>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 34 +++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index abeb4b19071f..a2e78969c0df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3843,7 +3843,7 @@ static u16 intel_get_ddb_size(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  }
>  
>  static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -				  u32 active_pipes);
> +				  u8 active_pipes);
>  
>  static void
>  skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -4228,6 +4228,7 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry icl_allowed_dbufs[] =
>  			[PIPE_C] = BIT(DBUF_S2),
>  		},
>  	},
> +	{}
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -4350,16 +4351,15 @@ static const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry tgl_allowed_dbufs[] =
>  			[PIPE_D] = BIT(DBUF_S2),
>  		},
>  	},
> +	{}
>  };
>  
> -static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> -			      u32 active_pipes,
> -			      const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices,
> -			      int size)
> +static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes,
> +			      const struct dbuf_slice_conf_entry *dbuf_slices)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes; i++) {
>  		if (dbuf_slices[i].active_pipes == active_pipes)
>  			return dbuf_slices[i].dbuf_mask[pipe];
>  	}
> @@ -4371,8 +4371,7 @@ static u8 compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
>   * returns correspondent DBuf slice mask as stated in BSpec for particular
>   * platform.
>   */
> -static u32 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> -				   u32 active_pipes)
> +static u8 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * FIXME: For ICL this is still a bit unclear as prev BSpec revision
> @@ -4386,32 +4385,25 @@ static u32 icl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
>  	 * still here - we will need it once those additional constraints
>  	 * pop up.
>  	 */
> -	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes,
> -				   icl_allowed_dbufs,
> -				   ARRAY_SIZE(icl_allowed_dbufs));
> +	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, icl_allowed_dbufs);
>  }
>  
> -static u32 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe,
> -				   u32 active_pipes)
> +static u8 tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(enum pipe pipe, u8 active_pipes)
>  {
> -	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes,
> -				   tgl_allowed_dbufs,
> -				   ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_allowed_dbufs));
> +	return compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes, tgl_allowed_dbufs);
>  }
>  
>  static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -				  u32 active_pipes)
> +				  u8 active_pipes)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  
>  	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 12))
> -		return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe,
> -					       active_pipes);
> +		return tgl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
>  	else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11))
> -		return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe,
> -					       active_pipes);
> +		return icl_compute_dbuf_slices(pipe, active_pipes);
>  	/*
>  	 * For anything else just return one slice yet.
>  	 * Should be extended for other platforms.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-26  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-25 17:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/20] drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/i915: Handle some leftover s/intel_crtc/crtc/ Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:29   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm/i915: Remove garbage WARNs Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/20] drm/i915: Add missing commas to dbuf tables Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/20] drm/i915: Use a sentinel to terminate the dbuf slice arrays Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  9:32   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/20] drm/i915: Make skl_compute_dbuf_slices() behave consistently for all platforms Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:30   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-02 14:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 15:50       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01  7:52       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/20] drm/i915: Polish some dbuf debugs Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 16:29   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:26     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05  9:53       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:46         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:56           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/20] drm/i915: Unify the low level dbuf code Ville Syrjala
2020-03-04 17:14   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 17:23   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-04 18:30     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05  8:28       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05 13:37         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-05 14:01           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-03-05  8:46   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/20] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:43   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-01  8:13   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/20] drm/i915: Nuke skl_ddb_get_hw_state() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:40   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/20] drm/i915: Move the dbuf pre/post plane update Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:38   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/20] drm/i915: Clean up dbuf debugs during .atomic_check() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26 11:32   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/20] drm/i915: Pass the crtc to skl_compute_dbuf_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-26  8:41   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/20] drm/i915: Introduce intel_dbuf_slice_size() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/i915: Introduce skl_ddb_entry_for_slices() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/20] drm/i915: Move pipe ddb entries into the dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2020-02-27 16:50   ` Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/20] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_dbuf_weights() Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/20] drm/i915: Encapsulate dbuf state handling harder Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:55   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/20] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf Ville Syrjala
2021-01-21 12:57   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-25 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/20] drm/i915: Check slice mask for holes Ville Syrjala
2020-02-25 17:47   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-26 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Proper dbuf global state (rev3) Patchwork
2020-02-27 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-29  2:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ftexsngy.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.