All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ath10k: add refcount for ath10k_core_restart
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:19:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imdlkuw8.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200108031957.22308-2-wgong@codeaurora.org> (Wen Gong's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:19:56 +0800")

Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:

> When it has more than one restart_work queued meanwhile, the 2nd
> restart_work is very esay to break the 1st restart work and lead
> recovery fail.
>
> Add a ref count to allow only one restart work running untill
> device successfully recovered.
>
> Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00029.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c  |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
> index 91f131b87efc..0e31846e6c89 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
> @@ -2199,6 +2199,14 @@ static void ath10k_core_restart(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct ath10k *ar = container_of(work, struct ath10k, restart_work);
>  	int ret;
> +	int restart_count;
> +
> +	restart_count = atomic_add_return(1, &ar->restart_count);
> +	if (restart_count > 1) {
> +		ath10k_warn(ar, "can not restart, count: %d\n", restart_count);
> +		atomic_dec(&ar->restart_count);
> +		return;
> +	}

I have been thinking a different approach for this. I think another
option is to have a function like this:

ath10k_core_firmware_crashed()
{
        queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
}

In patch 1 we would convert all existing callers to call that
function instead of queue_work() directly.

In patch 2 we would add a new flag to enum ath10k_dev_flags, or maybe
should actually use existing ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH? Don't know yet
which one is better. Now the function would do:

ath10k_core_firmware_crashed()
{
        if (test_bit(flag))
                return

        set_bit(flag)                                
	queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
}

That way restart_work queue would be called only one time.

Though I'm not sure how ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED would behave after this
change, it might get broken. Ah, actually I think even this patch breaks
the WEDGED state. This firmware restart is tricky, difficult to say what
is the best approach. Michal, are you reading? :) Any ideas?

And after looking more about this patch I don't see the need for the new
ar->restart_count atomic variable. Checking for ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH
would do the same thing AFAICS.

And related to this, (in a separate patch) I think we should utilise
ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH more. For example in ath10k_wmi_cmd_send() to
not even try to send a WMI command if the flag is set. Basically all
hardware access should be disabled except what is needed to restart the
firmware.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ath10k: add refcount for ath10k_core_restart
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:19:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imdlkuw8.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200108031957.22308-2-wgong@codeaurora.org> (Wen Gong's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:19:56 +0800")

Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:

> When it has more than one restart_work queued meanwhile, the 2nd
> restart_work is very esay to break the 1st restart work and lead
> recovery fail.
>
> Add a ref count to allow only one restart work running untill
> device successfully recovered.
>
> Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00029.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c  |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
> index 91f131b87efc..0e31846e6c89 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
> @@ -2199,6 +2199,14 @@ static void ath10k_core_restart(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct ath10k *ar = container_of(work, struct ath10k, restart_work);
>  	int ret;
> +	int restart_count;
> +
> +	restart_count = atomic_add_return(1, &ar->restart_count);
> +	if (restart_count > 1) {
> +		ath10k_warn(ar, "can not restart, count: %d\n", restart_count);
> +		atomic_dec(&ar->restart_count);
> +		return;
> +	}

I have been thinking a different approach for this. I think another
option is to have a function like this:

ath10k_core_firmware_crashed()
{
        queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
}

In patch 1 we would convert all existing callers to call that
function instead of queue_work() directly.

In patch 2 we would add a new flag to enum ath10k_dev_flags, or maybe
should actually use existing ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH? Don't know yet
which one is better. Now the function would do:

ath10k_core_firmware_crashed()
{
        if (test_bit(flag))
                return

        set_bit(flag)                                
	queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
}

That way restart_work queue would be called only one time.

Though I'm not sure how ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED would behave after this
change, it might get broken. Ah, actually I think even this patch breaks
the WEDGED state. This firmware restart is tricky, difficult to say what
is the best approach. Michal, are you reading? :) Any ideas?

And after looking more about this patch I don't see the need for the new
ar->restart_count atomic variable. Checking for ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH
would do the same thing AFAICS.

And related to this, (in a separate patch) I think we should utilise
ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH more. For example in ath10k_wmi_cmd_send() to
not even try to send a WMI command if the flag is set. Basically all
hardware access should be disabled except what is needed to restart the
firmware.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-14 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-08  3:19 [PATCH v4 0/2] start recovery process when payload length overflow for sdio Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19 ` Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ath10k: add refcount for ath10k_core_restart Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19   ` Wen Gong
2020-01-08 12:02   ` Justin Capella
2020-01-08 12:02     ` Justin Capella
2020-01-10 10:29     ` Wen Gong
2020-01-10 10:29       ` Wen Gong
2020-01-17  7:19       ` Wen Gong
2020-01-17  7:19         ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20  9:38         ` Justin Capella
2020-01-20  9:38           ` Justin Capella
2020-01-20 13:34           ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20 13:34             ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20 15:37             ` Justin Capella
2020-01-20 15:37               ` Justin Capella
2020-08-14 17:19   ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-08-14 17:19     ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-18  8:39     ` Wen Gong
2020-08-18  8:39       ` Wen Gong
2020-09-07 15:52       ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-07 15:52       ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-19 12:01     ` Wen Gong
2020-08-19 12:01       ` Wen Gong
2020-08-20  9:18     ` Wen Gong
2020-08-20  9:18       ` Wen Gong
2020-08-24  4:36       ` Wen Gong
2020-08-24  4:36         ` Wen Gong
2020-09-07 15:55       ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-07 15:55       ` Kalle Valo
     [not found]       ` <871rjd37kz.fsf@codeaurora.org>
2020-09-08  3:47         ` Wen Gong
2020-09-08  3:47         ` Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ath10k: start recovery process when payload length exceeds max htc length for sdio Wen Gong
2020-01-08  3:19   ` Wen Gong
2020-08-14 15:37   ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-14 15:37   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87imdlkuw8.fsf@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wgong@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.