All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	mika.penttila@nextfour.com, bhsharma@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into boot mem areas
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:15:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r348r0k9.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112094214.860924858@redhat.com> (Dave Young's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:41:19 +0800")

Hi Dave,

On Thu, Jan 12 2017, Dave Young wrote:

> efi_mem_reserve cares only about boot services regions and maybe loader areas.
> So add a new argument to efi_memmap_insert for this purpose.

Please see below.


> --- linux-x86.orig/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> +++ linux-x86/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_split_count(efi_me
>   * to see how large @buf needs to be.
>   */
>  void __init efi_memmap_insert(struct efi_memory_map *old_memmap, void *buf,
> -			      struct efi_mem_range *mem)
> +			      struct efi_mem_range *mem, bool boot_only)
>  {
>  	u64 m_start, m_end, m_attr;
>  	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> @@ -246,6 +246,12 @@ void __init efi_memmap_insert(struct efi
>  		start = md->phys_addr;
>  		end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
>  
> +		if (boot_only && !(md->type == EFI_LOADER_DATA ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_LOADER_CODE ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA))
> +			continue;
> +


Actually, the efi_mem_desc_lookup() called from
efi_arch_memmap_reserve() will only return mds not satisfying the
following condition:

  if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
      md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
      md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
  	continue;
  }

Furthermore, efi_arch_mem_reserve() will only accept ranges fully
contained within such a region.

I think we can make efi_arch_mem_reserve() return early if
EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME has been set already and thus, neglect this case in
efi_memmap_insert().

I suppose that we don't want to reserve within EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
regions in efi_mem_reserve() either -- these won't ever get made
available as general memory anyway [1]. So efi_arch_mem_reserve() should
return early here as well imo.

So, what would remain to be handled from efi_memmap_insert() in case of
boot_only would be EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA only?

(As a sidenote, Matt pointed out at [1] that the EFI_LOADER_* regions
 should be reserved early through memblock_reserve() and not through
 efi_mem_reserve()).

Thanks,

Nicolai


[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170109130702.GI16838@codeblueprint.co.uk

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel
	<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Nicolai Stange
	<nicstange-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	Dan Williams
	<dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	mika.penttila-MRsr7dthA9VWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	bhsharma-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into boot mem areas
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:15:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r348r0k9.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112094214.860924858-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Dave Young's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:41:19 +0800")

Hi Dave,

On Thu, Jan 12 2017, Dave Young wrote:

> efi_mem_reserve cares only about boot services regions and maybe loader areas.
> So add a new argument to efi_memmap_insert for this purpose.

Please see below.


> --- linux-x86.orig/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> +++ linux-x86/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_split_count(efi_me
>   * to see how large @buf needs to be.
>   */
>  void __init efi_memmap_insert(struct efi_memory_map *old_memmap, void *buf,
> -			      struct efi_mem_range *mem)
> +			      struct efi_mem_range *mem, bool boot_only)
>  {
>  	u64 m_start, m_end, m_attr;
>  	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> @@ -246,6 +246,12 @@ void __init efi_memmap_insert(struct efi
>  		start = md->phys_addr;
>  		end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
>  
> +		if (boot_only && !(md->type == EFI_LOADER_DATA ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_LOADER_CODE ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA))
> +			continue;
> +


Actually, the efi_mem_desc_lookup() called from
efi_arch_memmap_reserve() will only return mds not satisfying the
following condition:

  if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
      md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
      md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
  	continue;
  }

Furthermore, efi_arch_mem_reserve() will only accept ranges fully
contained within such a region.

I think we can make efi_arch_mem_reserve() return early if
EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME has been set already and thus, neglect this case in
efi_memmap_insert().

I suppose that we don't want to reserve within EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
regions in efi_mem_reserve() either -- these won't ever get made
available as general memory anyway [1]. So efi_arch_mem_reserve() should
return early here as well imo.

So, what would remain to be handled from efi_memmap_insert() in case of
boot_only would be EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA only?

(As a sidenote, Matt pointed out at [1] that the EFI_LOADER_* regions
 should be reserved early through memblock_reserve() and not through
 efi_mem_reserve()).

Thanks,

Nicolai


[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170109130702.GI16838-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-12 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-12  9:41 [PATCH 0/4] efi/x86: move efi bgrt init code to early init Dave Young
2017-01-12  9:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into boot mem areas Dave Young
2017-01-12  9:41   ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 11:15   ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2017-01-12 11:15     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-12 21:29     ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 21:29       ` Dave Young
2017-01-27 14:48       ` Matt Fleming
2017-01-27 17:04         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-27 17:04           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-27 22:13           ` Matt Fleming
2017-01-27 22:13             ` Matt Fleming
2017-01-27 22:15             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-27 22:15               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12 16:15   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12 16:15     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12 21:20     ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 21:20       ` Dave Young
2017-01-13  8:10       ` Dave Young
2017-01-12  9:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] efi/x86: move efi bgrt init code to early init code Dave Young
2017-01-12  9:56   ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 11:54   ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-12 11:54     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-12 21:39     ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 23:11       ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-12 23:11         ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-13  2:21         ` Dave Young
2017-01-13  3:04           ` Dave Young
2017-01-13  3:04             ` Dave Young
2017-01-13 12:21             ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-13 12:21               ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-16  2:55               ` Dave Young
2017-01-16  2:55                 ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 16:20   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12 16:20     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12 21:33     ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 21:33       ` Dave Young
2017-01-16 15:15       ` Bhupesh Sharma
2017-01-17 17:00         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12  9:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] efi/x86: move efi_print_memmap to drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c Dave Young
2017-01-12  9:41   ` Dave Young
2017-01-12 12:08   ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-12 21:40     ` Dave Young
2017-01-12  9:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] efi/x86: add debug code to print cooked memmap Dave Young
2017-01-12 16:18   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r348r0k9.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mika.penttila@nextfour.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.