All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: marcandre.lureau@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:28:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgd15z5w.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200804160604.GB4860@linux.fritz.box> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Tue, 4 Aug 2020 18:06:04 +0200")

Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:

> Am 04.08.2020 um 15:50 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > This way, a monitor command handler will still be able to access the
>> > current monitor, but when it yields, all other code code will correctly
>> > get NULL from monitor_cur().
>> >
>> > Outside of coroutine context, qemu_coroutine_self() returns the leader
>> > coroutine of the current thread.
>> 
>> Unsaid: you use it as a hash table key to map from coroutine to monitor,
>> and for that you need it to return a value unique to the coroutine in
>> coroutine context, and a value unique to the thread outside coroutine
>> context.  Which qemu_coroutine_self() does.  Correct?
>
> Correct.
>
>> The hash table works, but I hate it just as much as I hate
>> pthread_getspecific() / pthread_setspecific().
>> 
>> What we have here is a need for coroutine-local data.  Feels like a
>> perfectly natural concept to me.
>
> If you have a good concept how to implement this in a generic way that
> doesn't impact the I/O fast path, feel free to implement it and I'll
> happily use it.

Fair enough; I'll give it a shot.

> But the hash table is simple and works for this use case, so I see
> little reason to invest a lot of time in something that we haven't ever
> had another user for.
>
>> Are we going to create another hash table whenever we need another piece
>> of coroutine-local data?  Or shall we reuse the hash table, suitably
>> renamed and moved to another file?
>
> I think I would vote for separate hash tables rather than having a hash
> table containing a struct that mixes values from all subsystems, but
> this can be discussed when (if) the need arises.
>
>> Why not simply associate an opaque pointer with each coroutine?  All it
>> takes is one more member of struct Coroutine.  Whatever creates the
>> coroutine decides what to use it for.  The monitor coroutine would use
>> it to point to the monitor.
>
> This doesn't work. error_report() is called from all kinds of
> coroutines, not just from coroutines created from the monitor, and it
> wants to know the current monitor.

Yup, monitor_cur() and monitor_set_cur() need to work both in coroutine
context and outside coroutine context.

>> At least, discuss the design alternatives in the commit message.
>
> *sigh* Fine. Tell me which set of alternatives to discuss.

Let me first play with the alternative I suggested.

>> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  include/monitor/monitor.h |  2 +-
>> >  monitor/hmp.c             |  4 ++--
>> >  monitor/monitor.c         | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >  qapi/qmp-dispatch.c       |  4 ++--
>> >  stubs/monitor-core.c      |  2 +-
>> >  5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/monitor/monitor.h b/include/monitor/monitor.h
>> > index 43cc746078..16072e325c 100644
>> > --- a/include/monitor/monitor.h
>> > +++ b/include/monitor/monitor.h
>> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ typedef struct MonitorOptions MonitorOptions;
>> >  extern QemuOptsList qemu_mon_opts;
>> >  
>> >  Monitor *monitor_cur(void);
>> > -void monitor_set_cur(Monitor *mon);
>> > +void monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon);
>> >  bool monitor_cur_is_qmp(void);
>> >  
>> >  void monitor_init_globals(void);
>> > diff --git a/monitor/hmp.c b/monitor/hmp.c
>> > index 79be6f26de..3e73a4c3ce 100644
>> > --- a/monitor/hmp.c
>> > +++ b/monitor/hmp.c
>> > @@ -1082,9 +1082,9 @@ void handle_hmp_command(MonitorHMP *mon, const char *cmdline)
>> >  
>> >      /* old_mon is non-NULL when called from qmp_human_monitor_command() */
>> >      old_mon = monitor_cur();
>> > -    monitor_set_cur(&mon->common);
>> > +    monitor_set_cur(qemu_coroutine_self(), &mon->common);
>> >      cmd->cmd(&mon->common, qdict);
>> > -    monitor_set_cur(old_mon);
>> > +    monitor_set_cur(qemu_coroutine_self(), old_mon);
>> >  
>> >      qobject_unref(qdict);
>> >  }
>> > diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
>> > index 182ba136b4..35003bb486 100644
>> > --- a/monitor/monitor.c
>> > +++ b/monitor/monitor.c
>> > @@ -58,24 +58,38 @@ IOThread *mon_iothread;
>> >  /* Bottom half to dispatch the requests received from I/O thread */
>> >  QEMUBH *qmp_dispatcher_bh;
>> >  
>> > -/* Protects mon_list, monitor_qapi_event_state, monitor_destroyed.  */
>> > +/*
>> > + * Protects mon_list, monitor_qapi_event_state, coroutine_mon,
>> > + * monitor_destroyed.
>> > + */
>> >  QemuMutex monitor_lock;
>> >  static GHashTable *monitor_qapi_event_state;
>> > +static GHashTable *coroutine_mon; /* Maps Coroutine* to Monitor* */
>> >  
>> >  MonitorList mon_list;
>> >  int mon_refcount;
>> >  static bool monitor_destroyed;
>> >  
>> > -static __thread Monitor *cur_monitor;
>> > -
>> >  Monitor *monitor_cur(void)
>> >  {
>> > -    return cur_monitor;
>> > +    Monitor *mon;
>> > +
>> > +    qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
>> > +    mon = g_hash_table_lookup(coroutine_mon, qemu_coroutine_self());
>> > +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
>> > +
>> > +    return mon;
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > -void monitor_set_cur(Monitor *mon)
>> > +void monitor_set_cur(Coroutine *co, Monitor *mon)
>> >  {
>> > -    cur_monitor = mon;
>> > +    qemu_mutex_lock(&monitor_lock);
>> > +    if (mon) {
>> > +        g_hash_table_replace(coroutine_mon, co, mon);
>> > +    } else {
>> > +        g_hash_table_remove(coroutine_mon, co);
>> > +    }
>> > +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&monitor_lock);
>> >  }
>> 
>> You really need a contract now: any call to monitor_set_cur() with a
>> non-null @mon must be followed by a call with a null @mon.
>
> Why? g_hash_table_replace() removes the old value and replaces it with
> the new one.

If you monitor_set_cur(NULL) is forgotten or bypassed somehow, the hash
table entry stays even when the coroutine dies.  Minor memory leak.  If
another coroutine gets created at the same address, it "inherits" the
current monitor.  Not good.  If the monitor has died meanwhile, dangling
pointer.  Fortunately, monitors die only during shutdown, except for the
dummy in qmp_human_monitor_command().



  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 15:37 [PATCH v6 00/12] monitor: Optionally run handlers in coroutines Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] monitor: Add Monitor parameter to monitor_set_cpu() Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:24   ` Eric Blake
2020-08-04 11:19   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] monitor: Use getter/setter functions for cur_mon Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:31   ` Eric Blake
2020-06-02 13:36     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:36   ` Eric Blake
2020-08-04 12:46   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-08-04 16:16     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-05  7:19       ` Markus Armbruster
2020-08-05  8:25         ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-05  4:45     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] hmp: Set cur_mon only in handle_hmp_command() Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:37   ` Eric Blake
2020-08-04 12:54   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] qmp: Assert that no other monitor is active Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:38   ` Eric Blake
2020-08-04 12:57   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] qmp: Call monitor_set_cur() only in qmp_dispatch() Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:42   ` Eric Blake
2020-08-04 13:17   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 18:44   ` Eric Blake
2020-08-04 13:50   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-08-04 16:06     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-05  7:28       ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2020-08-05  8:32         ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-07 13:09         ` Ways to do per-coroutine properties (was: [PATCH v6 06/12] monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property) Markus Armbruster
2020-08-07 13:27           ` [PATCH] Simple & stupid coroutine-aware monitor_cur() Markus Armbruster
2020-08-10 12:19             ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-26 12:37               ` Markus Armbruster
2020-08-07 13:29           ` [PATCH] Coroutine-aware monitor_cur() with coroutine-specific data Markus Armbruster
2020-08-10 12:58             ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-26 12:40               ` Markus Armbruster
2020-08-26 13:49                 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-08-04 16:14     ` [PATCH v6 06/12] monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] qapi: Add a 'coroutine' flag for commands Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] qmp: Move dispatcher to a coroutine Kevin Wolf
2020-08-05 10:03   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] hmp: Add support for coroutine command handlers Kevin Wolf
2020-08-05 10:33   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] util/async: Add aio_co_reschedule_self() Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] block: Add bdrv_co_move_to_aio_context() Kevin Wolf
2020-05-28 15:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] block: Convert 'block_resize' to coroutine Kevin Wolf
2020-08-04 11:16 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] monitor: Optionally run handlers in coroutines Markus Armbruster
2020-08-05 11:34   ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-03 10:49     ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-03 12:45       ` Kevin Wolf
2020-09-03 14:17         ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sgd15z5w.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.